Founded in 1992, Team EIFFEL is the largest interim, consultancy and project management organisation in the Netherlands. On 19 December 2023 Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. acquired Team EIFFEL B.V. and its subsidiaries. The consolidated annual report of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. includes the Company and its subsidiaries (together "Team EIFFEL" or "the Group").
Team EIFFEL is a leading service provider in both the public and private domain. Team EIFFEL’s service offering is structured along 4 business lines: (I) Engineering & Project management, (II) Legal advisory, (III) Finance advisory, and (IV) Financial services. In the public domain, Team EIFFEL is the largest legal services provider in the Netherlands. Within the private domain, Team EIFFEL is dominant in finance & control, project management, supply chain, banking & insurance, IT and data. By cleverly combining these knowledge domains, we create innovation and customised service.
On 24 April 2025 the Group acquired Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries. The proforma figures reflect the financial results as if they have been consolidated as per 1 January 2025.
In millions of €, unless stated otherwise | Proforma (unaudited)1 | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
Result | |||
Revenue | 330.4 | 323.2 | 320.3 |
Gross margin2 | 102.5 | 98.8 | 104.6 |
EBITDA3 | 39.8 | 25.7 | 37.4 |
EBIT (operating profit) | (13.3) | (15.3) | (12.9) |
Result before taxes | (40.4) | (42.2) | (49.1) |
Net result | (37.0) | (38.4) | (41.6) |
Balance | |||
Total assets | 586.3 | 586.3 | 602.2 |
Equity | 161.0 | 161.0 | 199.4 |
Solvability (in % of total assets)4 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 33.1 |
Liquidity (in % current assets compared to current liablities)5 | 79.4 | 79.4 | 121.1 |
Net debt6 | 290.9 | 290.9 | 267.5 |
The year 2025 was characterised by increasingly challenging market conditions. Ongoing political and economic uncertainty in the Netherlands led to postponed projects, reduced external hiring and increased caution among clients. At the same time, regulatory developments affected the use of flexible workforce models, further impacting demand.
In this environment, Team EIFFEL demonstrated resilience and adaptability. Rather than slowing down, the organisation took decisive steps to strengthen its foundations and improve operational performance.
A key priority in 2025 was the continued integration of the organisation following the investment by TowerBrook Capital Partners at the end of 2023. Significant progress was made in bringing together the various brands and labels into a more unified structure. This included:
the further integration of labels into one organisation structured around four Business Lines (followed by a more streamlined structure with three Business Lines introduced in 2026)
the realisation of cost synergies and optimisation of business and staff teams
the introduction of a strong commercial excellence programme, improving sales conversion and utilisation of framework contracts
At the same time, the management team of the operating company was strengthened to support the next phase of development. In 2025, several key appointments were made, including a new CHRO, Managing Directors for core Business Lines and additional senior leadership roles to enhance strategic execution and organisational alignment.
Despite challenging market conditions, Team EIFFEL achieved tangible operational improvements during the year. In the second quarter of 2025, billability performance improved, supported by sharper commercial execution and better alignment between demand and available capacity.
In parallel, the organisation invested in strengthening its capabilities for the future. This included the appointment of a new IT Director, a Head of AI and the development of initial technology-enabled solutions, with the first applications launched in the second half of the year.
These steps mark the beginning of a broader transition: from a model focused primarily on capacity towards a model that combines expertise, execution and technology to deliver more consistent and scalable outcomes.
2025 served as a year of preparation. The steps taken throughout the year (strengthening the organisation, improving commercial performance, integrating capabilities and investing in technology) have created a stronger and more scalable foundation.
At the same time, structural changes in the market are becoming increasingly visible. Organisations are facing growing complexity, scarcity of talent and rising regulatory pressure. As a result, demand is shifting from individual capacity towards integrated solutions that deliver measurable outcomes.
Team EIFFEL is well positioned to respond to this shift. Building on the progress made in 2025, the organisation is moving towards a model in which multidisciplinary expertise, execution capability and technology are more closely integrated.
From 2026 onwards, Team EIFFEL will continue to pursue its disciplined growth strategy by taking further steps in strengthening the operating model, enhancing technology-enabled delivery and deepening long-term client partnerships. Building on the foundations laid in 2025, Team EIFFEL is well positioned to further develop its model and create sustainable value for clients, professionals and shareholders.
We call it staying ahead. Not just keeping up.
- Jo Maes, CEO Team EIFFEL
In 2025, Team EIFFEL continued to operate as a leading Dutch consultancy, project management and interim organisation, focused on delivering integrated solutions across domains where complexity, regulation and execution converge.
As at 31 December 2025, Team EIFFEL employs approximately 2,936 professionals (in FTE), operating across the Netherlands. Our community consists of multidisciplinary experts in legal, finance, engineering, data & analytics, project management and supply chain.
We operate at the intersection of expertise and execution. By combining domain knowledge with implementation power, we support organisations in both the public and private sectors to deliver on complex, high-impact challenges.
Our services are centred around four core capabilities:
Advisory, Process & Project Management, delivering and managing complex, multidisciplinary programmes in areas such as infrastructure, energy transition and public domain transformation.
Engineering, providing technical design, consultancy and project execution across industries, translating complexity into practical and scalable solutions.
Solutions & Consultancy, supporting organisations in improving performance and compliance through a combination of advisory and implementation, including managed services and outcome-based delivery models.
Interim & Operations, deploying specialised professionals and teams to address capacity challenges and execute large-scale operational programmes, particularly in regulated environments.
Across these activities, we increasingly integrate technology, data and standardised ways of working to enhance productivity, quality and predictability of delivery.
In 2025, Team EIFFEL was organised into four Business Lines:
Engineering & Projectmanagement
Legal Advisory
Finance Advisory
Financial Services
Each Business Line consists of multiple Business Units, organised around specific markets or solutions. These units operate with a high degree of autonomy, close to clients and markets, enabling speed, ownership and entrepreneurship. At the same time, central platform capabilities such as talent development, AI & technology and commercial support enable scale, consistency and continuous improvement across the organisation.
This model combines decentralised execution with centralised enablement, allowing Team EIFFEL to remain agile while building a scalable and increasingly integrated organisation. As a next step, in 2026 the organisation is streamlined from four to three Business Lines by integrating Financial Services into Legal Advisory and Finance Advisory.
The day‑to‑day management of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. is performed by its Management Board, which is responsible for the operational management of the Company and for executing the Group’s strategy as determined at Group level.
Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. does not have a separate Supervisory Board. Oversight and supervision are exercised at the level of the ultimate parent company, Equipe Holdings 1 B.V., which applies a two‑tier board structure consisting of a Management Board and a Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board of Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. oversees the policy of the Management Board.
During the 2025 financial year, the Management Board of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. consisted of Mr. H. Arts, Mr. K. Walker and Mr. Y. Bonenberg, together with Mr. M. Warmerdam until 31 December 2025, Mr. G.J. Meppelink until 9 February 2026, and Ms. M. Janssen, who was appointed as of 31 December 2025, while Mr. J. Maes was appointed as a member of the Management Board subsequent to the reporting period on 9 February 2026.
In 2025, the operating company, Team EIFFEL B.V., was led by Gert-Jan Meppelink as CEO and Yke Bonenberg as CFO. As of 9 February 2026, Jo Maes succeeded Gert-Jan Meppelink as CEO and now forms the Management Board together with Yke Bonenberg as CFO. Together, they hold the operational leadership and are responsible for the daily management of the company as well as the development and execution of the medium- and long-term strategy.

Jo Maes was appointed CEO of Team EIFFEL in February 2026, following the transition prepared during 2025. He brings extensive experience in technology-driven transformation and international consultancy environments. Prior to joining Team EIFFEL, he held senior leadership positions in the technology and consulting sector, including CEO roles at Ordina and Sopra Steria.
At Team EIFFEL, Jo Maes is responsible for leading the organisation into its next phase of growth, with a focus on technology-enabled, multidisciplinary solutions and the development of a scalable platform that delivers structural customer value.
Yke Bonenberg serves as Chief Financial Officer of Team EIFFEL and is responsible for the company’s financial strategy, performance management and governance. He oversees financial planning, reporting, risk management and supports the execution of the company’s growth strategy, including acquisitions and integration.
Gert-Jan Meppelink served as Chief Executive Officer of Team EIFFEL from 2020 until February 2026. With extensive experience in board-level roles in the corporate sector, he led the company through a period of significant growth, successfully executing a buy-and-build strategy that established Team EIFFEL as a leading provider of project management, interim and consultancy services.
Team EIFFEL operates with the strategic support of its shareholders TowerBrook Capital Partners and Gilde Equity Management. Together, they provide a strong foundation for the continued development and disciplined growth of the organisation.
Both shareholders bring extensive experience in building and scaling professional services organisations. Their involvement goes beyond capital and is centred around long-term value creation. This includes not only financial performance, but also the ability to build a resilient organisation, attract and develop talent, and deliver meaningful impact on the societal challenges in which Team EIFFEL operates. They actively support Team EIFFEL in refining its strategic direction, strengthening governance and enabling the execution of its long-term growth ambitions.
This partnership proved particularly relevant in 2025 and will remain relevant in the nearby future. As Team EIFFEL evolves towards a more integrated, technology-enabled and platform-driven model, the focus is on creating a scalable organisation with predictable performance and controlled risk. The shareholders play an important role in supporting this transition, ensuring that growth is balanced with operational discipline and long-term value creation.
Organisations are facing a structural shift in how complex challenges must be addressed. Increasing regulatory pressure, scarcity of talent, technological acceleration and growing societal expectations are reshaping the way governments and businesses operate.
These developments require more than isolated expertise. They demand integrated solutions that combine domain knowledge, execution capability and technology to deliver predictable outcomes. Team EIFFEL operates at the centre of these developments. We support organisations in translating complexity into execution, across a number of structural themes where demand is both significant and long-term.

The Netherlands faces a substantial and ongoing investment challenge in infrastructure, mobility and spatial development. From maintaining ageing assets such as bridges, quay walls and water defences, to delivering large-scale programmes in housing and urban development, execution capacity and coordination are critical.
Team EIFFEL plays a key role in enabling these programmes. By combining project and process management, engineering expertise and regulatory knowledge, we ensure that complex infrastructure projects remain controllable, predictable and deliverable.
Our multidisciplinary approach allows us to connect technical design, stakeholder management, contract management and project control into one integrated delivery model, reducing risk and increasing execution certainty.
The energy transition is one of the most complex societal transformations of our time. It requires large-scale investments, long-term planning and coordination across public and private stakeholders, while operating under increasing regulatory and financial constraints.
Team EIFFEL supports organisations in both shaping and executing this transition. We combine expertise in engineering, project management, legal frameworks and financial structuring to accelerate the development and delivery of energy infrastructure and sustainable solutions.
By integrating these disciplines, we help clients move from ambition to execution, ensuring that projects are not only designed, but also realised.
Governments and regulated industries are operating in an environment of increasing legal complexity and public scrutiny. New legislation, transparency requirements and societal pressure require organisations to act with precision, speed and accountability.
Team EIFFEL supports clients in managing this complexity. Our legal professionals combine deep domain expertise with a pragmatic, execution-oriented approach and technology as a smart assistant. We assist in handling complex case portfolios, improving legal processes and ensuring compliance with evolving regulations.
In addition, we increasingly support organisations in structuring and standardising legal work, enabling greater efficiency and consistency in high-volume environments.
The financial sector and other regulated industries are facing growing pressure to detect, prevent and manage financial crime. Regulatory requirements continue to increase, while the nature of risks becomes more complex and data-driven.
Team EIFFEL supports financial institutions and large organisations in strengthening their compliance and risk management capabilities. We deploy specialised teams to execute large-scale programmes in areas such as Know Your Customer (KYC), transaction monitoring and remediation.
By combining domain expertise, operational capacity and data-driven approaches, we help organisations improve both effectiveness and efficiency in managing financial risks.
Organisations across sectors are under pressure to improve performance, increase efficiency and remain compliant, while continuing to deliver day-to-day operations.
Team EIFFEL supports these organisations at the intersection of advisory and execution. We design and implement improvements in areas such as finance, risk, governance, supply chain and data-driven decision-making.
Increasingly, we deliver these services through integrated solutions and managed services models, taking responsibility not only for advice, but also for implementation and results.
Across all our services, technology is becoming an integral part of how value is delivered. Data, analytics and artificial intelligence are embedded into our ways of working to enhance productivity, standardise processes and improve decision-making.
Rather than offering standalone technology solutions, Team EIFFEL focuses on embedding technology within its domain expertise. This enables the development of repeatable approaches, improved quality and more predictable outcomes for clients.
Team EIFFEL operates in a market that is undergoing structural change. Increasing complexity, scarcity of talent and intensifying regulatory pressure are reshaping how organisations deliver results.
In 2025, these developments became more pronounced. Political and economic uncertainty led to postponed projects and reduced external hiring, while regulatory changes increased client caution, particularly in the use of flexible workforce models. This created a more challenging commercial environment across multiple sectors.
Against this backdrop, Team EIFFEL focused on strengthening its operational performance and preparing the organisation for the next phase of growth.
In 2025 we added one company to the Team EIFFEL portfolio: Wepro.
With the addition of Wepro, Team EIFFEL strengthened its position in the Dutch engineering consultancy market and took an important next step in expanding its Engineering & Projectmanagement capabilities. Founded in 1998 and headquartered in Wageningen, Wepro has built a strong reputation as a specialised consulting and engineering firm with deep expertise in mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, installation engineering, energy, infrastructure and civil engineering.
Wepro brings a solid and well‑established network of highly qualified consultants who operate at the heart of complex technical and societal challenges. Their experience and domain knowledge further enhance Team EIFFEL’s ability to support clients in the fields of infrastructure development, energy transition and the physical living environment. By combining Wepro’s technical engineering expertise with Team EIFFEL’s multidisciplinary consulting and project management capabilities, the Group is able to deliver more integrated and scalable solutions to clients.
A key priority in 2025 was the improvement of commercial effectiveness. A dedicated sales excellence programme was implemented, leading to:
increased number of client interactions
improved billability through stronger commercial execution
better utilisation of large framework contracts, particularly within the public sector
optimisation of business and staff teams through cost efficiency measures
better alignment between demand and available capacity
These improvements contributed to a more efficient and resilient organisation and improved performance during the year, despite continued pressure on market demand and less dependent on volume growth alone.
Further progress was made in aligning the organisation to support a more integrated way of working. The continued integration of labels into four Business Lines (Engineering & Projectmanagement, Legal Advisory, Finance Advisory, Financial Services) has improved focus, accountability and collaboration. It formed the basis for a further streamlined structure with three Business Lines introduced in 2026.
Team EIFFEL continues to operate through a combination of decentralised execution and centralised enablement. Business Units remain close to clients and markets, ensuring flexibility and ownership. At the same time, central capabilities, such as IT & Technology, HR and commercial support, are further developed to increase consistency and productivity across the organisation.
In 2025, steps were taken to strengthen governance, improve alignment and introduce more standardised ways of working, supporting the organisation’s ability to scale. This included:
further integration of acquired companies into a unified organisational structure
investments in technology and data capabilities, including the appointment of a Head of AI and the development of AI-enabled applications within service delivery
strengthening central functions to support scalability and consistency
The actions taken in 2025 have strengthened Team EIFFEL’s position in a challenging market. By improving commercial performance, enhancing organisational alignment and investing in future capabilities, the organisation has laid the groundwork for further development with a renewed strategy from 2026 onwards: evolving our model towards integrated, technology-enabled solutions that deliver measurable outcomes for clients.
At Team EIFFEL, people are the foundation of our ability to deliver impact. In a market defined by increasing complexity and technological change, the value of human expertise is not diminishing, it is becoming more critical. Technology enhances productivity, but it is our people who apply judgement, connect disciplines and ensure successful execution.
Our People Strategy is therefore closely aligned with our platform ambition: enabling every professional to deliver more impact, with greater consistency and less friction. By combining strong talent attraction, continuous development and a performance-driven culture, we build a workforce that is capable of supporting both current operations and future growth.
The scarcity of qualified professionals and the increasing demand for multidisciplinary capabilities require a more deliberate approach to talent.
At Team EIFFEL, we focus on identifying and developing professionals not only based on experience, but on their ability to learn, adapt and perform in complex environments. This includes the capability to work across domains, apply technology effectively and take ownership of outcomes.
By organising talent around skills, potential and development rather than fixed roles alone, we create a more flexible and future-proof workforce.
Attracting the right talent is essential to sustaining growth and maintaining quality. Through our Talent Hub, we position Team EIFFEL as a single entry point for talent, providing visibility across domains, brands and career paths. This supports both efficiency in recruitment and a consistent employer proposition.
In a competitive labour market, our focus is on attracting individuals who combine domain expertise with a strong learning mindset and the ambition to contribute to multidisciplinary teams.
Continuous development is a core element of our People Strategy. The Team EIFFEL Academy provides a structured and scalable platform for professional growth. The Academy integrates:
domain-specific expertise
soft skills and leadership development
coaching and performance support
tech & AI development
This enables professionals to continuously develop their capabilities in line with both client demand and strategic priorities. Our “Team of Teams” model supports collaboration, knowledge sharing and ownership at team level, while the broader organisation provides access to expertise, opportunities and development.
We aim to offer an environment in which professionals can build long-term careers without the need to leave the organisation, by continuously providing new challenges, domains and growth opportunities.
Our culture is guided by four core values:
Together – We believe that collective strength drives individual growth
Impact – We focus on contributing to meaningful societal challenges
Fun – We foster an environment that combines performance with energy and engagement
Winning – We strive for excellence and continuous improvement, the mentality of ‘playing to win’
These values define how we work together, how we engage with clients and how we develop our people.
Team EIFFEL regards diversity and inclusion as an essential driver for sustainable long‑term value creation, effective leadership and sound decision‑making. A diverse and inclusive leadership composition contributes to a broader range of perspectives, strengthens collaboration across teams and supports innovation within the Group. Team EIFFEL believes that diversity and inclusion are important conditions for the proper and balanced fulfilment of tasks by senior management, directors and the Management Board, and have a positive effect on professionals, organisational culture and long‑term performance.
With respect to the composition of the Management Board and senior management, Team EIFFEL applies a diversity policy that focuses on achieving and maintaining a balanced mix of gender, background, experience and perspective. Particular emphasis is placed on gender diversity in leadership positions. The objective of this policy is to foster an inclusive culture and to ensure that leadership bodies reflect both the workforce and the society in which Team EIFFEL operates.
The diversity policy is implemented through recruitment, selection and succession planning processes for management and senior leadership positions. When filling leadership roles, candidates are assessed primarily on their skills, experience and leadership qualities, while diversity considerations, including gender balance, are explicitly taken into account.
At the end of the reporting year, the male‑female ratio within senior management and director roles across the business lines was approximately 60/40. This level of gender balance is considered appropriate and representative of the current leadership population within Team EIFFEL and reflects the outcomes of the diversity policy applied during the year. As at 31 December 2025, the Management Board consisted of five members, of whom one was female. Given the limited size of the Management Board, gender diversity is mainly taken into consideration in succession planning and future appointments.
In accordance with Article 3d of the Decree on the Contents of the Management Board Report (Besluit inhoud bestuursverslag) and Articles 2:166 and 2:276 of the Dutch Civil Code, Team EIFFEL applies a gender balance target for leadership positions. The target is to maintain at least the current male‑female ratio of approximately 60/40 within senior management and director roles.
The plan to achieve and maintain this target consists of continued attention to diversity considerations in recruitment, promotion and succession planning for leadership positions, combined with targeted development and retention initiatives. Progress in relation to gender balance is monitored periodically and discussed at management level.
As the stated gender balance target was achieved during the reporting year, no additional corrective measures were required. Team EIFFEL remains committed to maintaining a balanced and diverse composition of its leadership going forward and will continue to monitor developments in this area.
A strong brand is a critical enabler of sustainable growth. For Team EIFFEL, our brand represents more than visual identity. It reflects how we deliver value, how we attract and develop talent, and how we position ourselves in the market.
Historically, Team EIFFEL has developed as a collective of specialised organisations, each with its own identity, market focus and expertise. This multi-brand structure has enabled strong positioning within specific domains and sectors, supporting both growth and entrepreneurial strength.
At the same time, the market in which we operate is evolving. Clients increasingly seek integrated solutions, delivered by a single, accountable partner. They value clarity, consistency and the ability to work with one organisation that can combine expertise across domains. This shift is reflected in the development of our brand philosophy: In 2025, Team EIFFEL prepared the future steps towards a more unified brand and identity.
A strong and consistent brand supports multiple strategic objectives. For clients, it provides clarity and trust, enabling Team EIFFEL to position itself as a single partner for complex, multidisciplinary challenges. For professionals, it creates a clear and attractive identity, supporting recruitment, engagement and long-term development within one organisation. And for the organisation as a whole, it enables more effective cross-selling, accelerates the integration of acquisitions and contributes to a more scalable operating model.
The strength of the Team EIFFEL brand is rooted in its people and culture. Our brand is not only communicated externally, but experienced internally through the way we collaborate, perform and engage. This includes a strong focus on community, performance and shared values, supported by initiatives such as events, partnerships and the integration of top sports as a source of inspiration.
By aligning brand, culture and strategy, Team EIFFEL ensures that its positioning is not only visible, but also tangible in daily practice.
In 2025, the EBITDA was 25.7 million euros (2024: 37.4 million) and gross profit was 98.8 million euros (2024: 104.6 million). The gross margin was 30.6% (2024: 32.7%) and the EBITDA margin 8.0% (2024: 11.7%). Revenue increased by 2.9 million euros, gross profit decreased by 5.8 million and EBITDA decreased by 11.7 million. Selling and general administrative expenses, excluding depreciation and amortisation, amounted to 73.1 million euros; 22.6% of revenue (2024: 67.2 million; 21.0% of revenue).
The net result for the year of (38.4) million euros (2024: (41.6) million) is in 2025 negatively impacted by depreciation and amortisation of (41.0) million euros (2024: (50.3) million), an impairment of goodwill of 5.1 million euros (2024: 0.0 million) and finance costs of 26.9 million euros (2024: 36.2 million). The depreciation and amortisation is mainly related to the amortisation of customer relations, brand & trade names and the order backlogs that are acquired in acquisitions in total 19.0 million euros (2024: 35.2 million) and the IFRS-16 related depreciation in total 16.8 million euros (2024: 14.1 million). In 2025, the Group recognised an impairment loss on goodwill of 5.1 million euros (2024: 0.0 million) related to the Financial Services cash‑generating unit. The finance costs include interest on bank overdrafts and loans of 21.5 million euros (2024: 22.0 million), interest on IFRS-16 lease liabilities of 3.4 million euros (2024: 2.9 million), capitalised financing expenses of 1.8 million euros (2024: 8.9 million) and other finance costs of 0.2 million euros (2024: 2.5 million).
On 31 December 2025 the Group employed 2,518 direct professionals (31 December 2024: 2,548) and 417 indirect professionals on FTE basis (31 December 2024: 431). Furthermore, the Group had 84 freelancers under contract on a full-time basis as per 31 December 2025 (31 December 2024: 171). An important ratio is the direct-to-indirect ratio (salaried professionals/internal staff) that is 6.0 as per 31 December 2025 (31 December 2024: 5.9).
in million € or percentage | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Revenue | 323.2 | 320.3 |
Cost of sales | 224.4 | 215.7 |
Gross profit | 98.8 | 104.6 |
Gross margin1 | 30.6% | 32.7% |
Selling and general administrative expenses excluding depreciation and amortisation | 73.1 | 67.2 |
EBITDA1 | 25.7 | 37.4 |
EBITDA margin1 | 8.0% | 11.7% |
Depreciation, amortisation and impairments | (41.0) | (50.3) |
Operating profit (EBIT)1 | (15.3) | (12.9) |
EBIT margin1 | -4.7% | -4.0% |
Finance costs | 27 | 36 |
Result before taxes | (42.2) | (49.1) |
Income tax expense | (3.8) | (7.5) |
Net result for the year | (38.4) | (41.6) |
The cash generated from operations amounted to 35.9 million euros (2024: 35.7 million) and after deducting the interest and income tax paid the net cash inflow from operations activities amounted to 13.0 million euros (2024: 12.5 million).
On 25 April 2025 the Group acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Wepro Group B.V. and and its subsidiaries resulting in a cash outflow from investing activities of 17.2 million euros (2024: 32.8 million). The purchase price has been financed through the the acquisition and capex facility totalling 15.0 million euros and cash of 3.0 million euros.
Net cash outflow from financing activities amounted to 3.8 million euros (2024: net cash inflow of 26.5 million). In addition to the bond, the Group has a revolving credit facility with Rabobank for working capital purposes, consisting of a bank overdraft facility of up to 20.0 million euros and an acquisition and capex facility of up to 20.0 million euros. As at 31 December 2025, only the acquisition and capex facility was used for an amount of 15.0 million euros to finance the acquisition of Wepro. The available bank overdraft facility remained unused as at 31 December 2025. Lease repayments under IFRS 16 amounting to 18.3 million euros (2024: 16.6 million) were presented as part of financing activities.
The net debt position concerns interest-bearing debts minus cash and cash equivalents and amounted to 290.9 million euros at 31 December 2025 (31 December 2024: 267.5). Solvency at 31 December 2025 was 27.5% (31 December 2024: 33.1%). Liquidity was 79.4% at 31 December 2025 (31 December 2024: 121.1%).
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Net debt1 | 290,869 | 267,484 |
being: | ||
Borrowings | 259,016 | 242,410 |
Lease liabilities | 45,300 | 46,463 |
Cash and cash equivalents | -13,447 | -21,389 |
290,869 | 267,484 | |
Solvency1 | 27.5% | 33.1% |
Liquidity1 | 79.4% | 121.1% |
We will continue our growth strategy, meaning that we will focus on organic growth by mainly increasing our share of wallet on the existing top 50 customers. We will also continue to grow through mergers and acquisitions. We will continue with our Talent Acquisition strategy and welcome new hires in 2026. We will further strengthen the HR foundation with data & analytics to better understand and reduce our churn (mainly 1st year churn). Projects in that area are to obtain assignments that better suit the development of the consultants, more development opportunities in general and more flexible employment conditions.
Further strengthening our brand identity and recognition in the market. We will support the business units in their ambition by enhancing the customer experience through targeted campaigns and personalized interactions.
At Team EIFFEL, we will be heading for growth. Rate increases are important alongside smarter use of available resources. Investments within Team EIFFEL will be mainly in L&D, Recruitment and Marketing. We will work more efficiently within the Business Units, further improving the direct/ indirect ratio's. CAPEX investments mainly relate to IT and housing. Whereby for IT, the integration of the various IT-systems is the key element, so that further harmonisation can take place. To determine cash flow requirements, Team EIFFEL uses liquidity forecasts. On a daily basis, we ensure that sufficient liquidity is available from the currently known operating cash flows and available credit facility to cover expected operating costs and meet financial obligations on a going-concern basis.
Top sports has long been an integral part of Team EIFFEL’s identity. It reflects a mindset that goes beyond performance alone: a focus on discipline, continuous improvement and the ambition to win.
This mindset aligns closely with the way we operate as an organisation. In a market where complexity is increasing and expectations are rising, the ability to perform under pressure, adapt quickly and continuously improve is essential.
Team EIFFEL collaborates with a group of (former) elite athletes and coaches who contribute to the development of our professionals. These talent coaches bring experience from the highest level of international sports and translate this into insights on performance, resilience, teamwork and leadership.
Among them are (former) athletes such as Pieter van den Hoogenband, Jens van ‘t Wout and Harrie Lavreysen, as well as a broader group of athletes and coaches across a variety of disciplines.
Through inspiration sessions, coaching and events, they contribute to strengthening the performance culture within Team EIFFEL. The focus is not on sport itself, but on the underlying principles: setting clear goals, dealing with feedback, maintaining discipline and striving for continuous improvement.
Team EIFFEL also supports athletes in their transition to a professional career outside of sports. Through tailored programmes, athletes are introduced to the business environment, develop new skills and gain access to a professional network.
This initiative reflects our broader expertise in talent development: recognising potential, supporting growth and enabling individuals to perform in new environments.
The integration of top sports contributes to a culture in which performance, teamwork and enjoyment are closely connected. It reinforces the mindset of continuous development and supports the ambition to deliver high-quality results in a demanding environment.
By embedding the principles of top sports within our organisation, Team EIFFEL strengthens its ability to perform consistently and to develop talent in line with its strategic ambitions.
Risk management is an important pillar of Team EIFFEL’s corporate governance and contributes to the responsible achievement of our strategic objectives. It is a continuous process carried out at strategic, tactical and operational levels, providing both steering information and accountability in decision-making. Team EIFFEL aims to manage identified and prioritised risks in the best possible way.
Key principles
Risk management is an integral part of operations and is increasingly embedded in the governance structure. The aim is to identify significant risks, monitor the achievement of objectives and ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
The risk management system aims to mitigate the adverse effects of individual risks at an early stage.
The Management Board is responsible for establishing, maintaining and periodically assessing the effectiveness of systems for risk management and internal control.
Team EIFFEL’s willingness to take risks is limited to responsible business risks: the probability of their occurrence and their possible consequences must not jeopardise the continuity of the business.
The internal control framework is based on the widely applied COSO Integrated Internal Control Framework (IICF). Team EIFFEL deploys guidelines and consultation structures, management reporting and internal control measures to manage and monitor risks. These instruments support the achievement of strategic, operational and financial objectives and enable timely adjustments where necessary. As with any system of internal control, these measures provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance.
Team EIFFEL distinguishes strategic, operational, financial and compliance risks. In our risk assessment, we consider the likelihood of occurrence and potential impact, and weigh these against the costs and effectiveness of mitigating measures. The extent to which risks are accepted differs per risk category. The risk matrix shows the key risks that Team EIFFEL faces. It shows which risks (may) have the greatest impact on operations and the probability of their occurrence.
Risk category | Risk acceptance | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
Strategic | Moderate | We are willing to take moderate risks in pursuing our ambitions, balancing commercial objectives with our societal role. |
Operational | Low | We seek to minimise risks that could jeopardise business continuity. Information security and privacy risks are managed with a low tolerance. |
Financial | Low | We maintain a solid financial position to support continuity and access to funding. |
Compliance | Nil | We apply a zero‑tolerance policy to compliance and integrity risks. |

The key strategic risks stem from economic, technological and societal changes. Being able to respond quickly to developments and client knowledge demands is increasingly important for our operations.
Our business is affected by macro-economic factors beyond our control, including economic growth, employment trends, inflation and interest rates, and geopolitical developments. As the majority of revenue is generated in the Netherlands, our operations are particularly exposed to Dutch market conditions. We monitor macro-economic developments, political decision-making processes and legislative developments, and maintain an ongoing dialogue with stakeholders to support timely prioritisation and decision-making.
Focus on a balanced portfolio across public and private markets and on long-term contracts and framework agreements to support revenue visibility.
Monitor the spread of revenue across activities and segments and manage productivity and costs to preserve flexibility.
Maintain strong cash management to support resilience in challenging market conditions.
Competitive dynamics may change due to consolidation, new entrants, changing customer needs and technology-enabled service models. Our competitiveness depends on our ability to anticipate client needs, deliver services in line with agreements, and meet contractual deadlines.
Maintain a clearly defined strategy with a strong client focus and proactive recruitment of highly skilled professionals.
Sharpen market positioning and closely monitor external developments to maintain or strengthen our strategic position.
Pursue organic growth and, where appropriate, acquisitions that strengthen selected market positions.
Technological developments, including data analytics and artificial intelligence, affect the labour market, internal processes and client expectations. Team EIFFEL aims to leverage innovation responsibly, both to improve internal efficiency (e.g., recruitment and matching) and to enhance solutions delivered to clients. This includes maintaining appropriate governance over the use of technology, data and AI in light of evolving regulation and stakeholder expectations.
Further strengthen information systems and a digital first culture, with the right balance between digitalisation and personal attention.
Increase the use of data analytics and automation in relevant business processes, supported by appropriate governance and controls.
Where relevant, cooperate with specialist software providers to deliver technology enabled solutions at clients.
Operational risks involve developments that could negatively impact internal processes, employees, clients and systems.
We are dependent on IT to manage critical business processes, including administrative and financial functions. Downtime, cyberattacks, data loss or unauthorised access could adversely affect operations and reputation. We implement measures aimed at ensuring data availability, integrity and confidentiality, monitor effectiveness and apply improvements when necessary. In this context, we monitor relevant external requirements and expectations around cybersecurity risk management and incident reporting.
Operate internal software in a cloud-driven environment supported by backup and recovery procedures.
Further professionalise the information security policy, security organisation, authorisation management and security awareness.
Cooperate with ISAE 3402-certified IT suppliers who are demonstrably “in control” and monitor key suppliers via assurance reports.
As a project, consultancy and interim organisation, we depend on the knowledge, experience and commitment of our people. Tight labour market conditions and wage and cost inflation can increase the cost of attracting and retaining talent and may affect delivery capacity. We therefore invest in employer branding, recruitment, on-boarding, training and development and active career management to support retention and the availability of required capabilities.
Further strengthen market positioning and employer branding.
Continue to expand and develop the employee journey, including on-boarding, development and career guidance.
Invest in training and capability development and further professionalise the Team EIFFEL Academy.
Measure employee satisfaction and learn from exit interviews to improve retention drivers.
Use referral campaigns and targeted recruitment programmes (including trainee programmes) to attract new talent.
Revenue concentration may expose the Group to client-specific demand changes. The Group’s largest customer represents less than 10% of total revenue and revenue is spread across a broad client base. We aim to deepen relationships with core clients through cross-selling, while also growing revenue across a large number of smaller clients.
Increase revenue share with core customers by offering a broader range of services and strengthening long-term relationships.
Continue to broaden and diversify revenue sources across a large number of clients.
In addition to organic growth, we pursue growth through acquisitions. There is a risk that acquired companies may not meet expectations due to integration challenges or incorrect estimates and assumptions made during the acquisition process.
Prepare a clear business plan prior to acquisitions and involve the Board in key decision-making.
Use internal and external experts to assess financial, legal, operational and cultural fit.
Execute structured integration planning and evaluate acquisition and integration processes to identify improvements.
Providing complete, accurate and timely financial and non-financial information is a prerequisite for adequate corporate governance. Reliability of reporting is a prerequisite for effective governance of the organisation and true accountability to stakeholders.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group cannot meet its current and future financial obligations. The Group aims to maintain sufficient liquidity through operating cash flows and access to committed facilities. To determine cash flow requirements, management uses forecasting to track expected inflows, outflows and the development of credit facilities and to support going-concern assessment.
The Group has issued bonds which have been listed on the Open Market of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since the issue date and, as from 15 December 2025, have also been admitted to trading on Nasdaq STO Corporate Bonds of Nasdaq Stockholm AB. The Group has agreed a revolving credit facility with Rabobank for general working capital purposes. The facility consists of a bank overdraft facility of up to 20 million euros and an acquisition and capex facility of up to 20 million euros. As at 31 December 2025, the acquisition and capex facility was drawn for 15.0 million euros in connection with the acquisition of Wepro, while the bank overdraft facility remained undrawn.
Maintain a rolling cash flow forecast and monitor facility headroom to support timely decision-making.
Maintain prudent funding and preserve access to committed credit facilities.
Negative publicity or announcements relating to the Group may, regardless of whether justified or not, adversely affect brand value and the ability to attract new customers or extend contracts. Providing complete, accurate and timely financial and non‑financial information helps maintain stakeholder confidence. Over recent years, Team EIFFEL continued to digitise business processes and further tightened and defined control measures. As a result of the bond listing and associated reporting obligations, the importance of timely and accurate reporting has increased.
Continuously improve documentation and operation of key controls and strengthen the control environment.
Apply segregation of duties and the four-eyes principle in relevant processes.
Subject key processes to periodic internal and external reviews where applicable (e.g., quality and certification-related audits).
Acquisitions may result in the recognition of customer relationships, brands and goodwill. Changes in economic and market conditions and sector developments may trigger impairment. We perform an annual impairment test and monitor performance versus budget during the year to identify adverse developments in a timely manner.
Annually, Team EIFFEL tests the amount of goodwill for impairment. Monthly, realised results are discussed in conjunction with budgets in order to manage unexpected developments in a timely manner.
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a customer or counterparty fails to meet contractual obligations. Credit risk arises mainly from trade receivables and cash held with banks.
Provide services to customers with adequate credit standing and monitor receivables proactively.
Use independent, professional and highly qualified credit institutions for banking.
Non‑compliance with laws and regulations and integrity violations can result in high fines and significant reputation damage. Team EIFFEL strives for an open and transparent culture in which new and amended laws and regulations are translated into policies, processes and systems in a timely manner. Where relevant, specialist advice is obtained from competent experts (e.g., lawyers, tax specialists and auditors that are not responsible for the statutory audit).
The Group operates across multiple segments and is subject to a broad and evolving set of regulatory requirements, including labour and employment law, health and safety, data protection, corporate and competition law and taxation. Ongoing developments in the Netherlands relating to the qualification of employment relationships, the use of freelancers and equal pay requirements may affect contracting models, cost structures and client behaviour.
The Group monitors regulatory developments on an ongoing basis and translates relevant changes into policies, processes and controls
Key processes and supporting IT systems are periodically reviewed to ensure demonstrable compliance.
Awareness and onboarding initiatives are in place to promote integrity, compliance awareness and consistent application across the organisation.
Fraud can take place in many forms, ranging from small-scale incidents to events that could materially impact operations. Team EIFFEL is committed to conducting business in a transparent, fair and ethical manner. Employees are expected to adhere to the Code of Conduct and core values. Team EIFFEL has a zero‑tolerance policy on corruption, bribery and other unethical behaviour.
Maintain processes aimed at fraud prevention and detection.
Reinforce the “tone at the top” and accountability for ethical behaviour.
Apply segregation of duties and the four‑eyes principle in relevant processes.
As a professional services provider, Team EIFFEL is exposed to the risk of mistakes being made during assignments, which may result in liability claims. In addition, Team EIFFEL runs a risk of broader corporate liability.
Deploy highly qualified professionals and apply quality assurance practices where relevant.
Maintain professional and directors’ liability insurance.
This statement is included pursuant to Article 2a(1) of the Decree on the Contents of the Management Board Report (Besluit inhoud bestuursverslag – the “Bib”). Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. is an issuing entity whose securities, other than shares, are admitted to trading on a regulated market as referred to in Section 1:1 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wet op het financieel toezicht).
The Bib therefore applies to the Company, with the exception of Article 2a(2), Article 3 and Article 3a(b) and (c). As no shares are admitted to trading and the Company does not make use of a multilateral trading facility for shares, the Dutch Corporate Governance Code does not apply to the Company. As a result, the corporate governance statement is limited in scope.
The information required to be included in this statement pursuant to Article 3a of the Bib, insofar as applicable to the Company, can be found in the sections of the 2025 Management Board Report referred to below and is included and repeated in this statement:
Main features of the internal risk management and control systems relating to the financial reporting process (Article 3a(a) Bib)
Information concerning the main features of the internal risk management and control systems in connection with the financial reporting process of the Company and the Group is disclosed in the section Risk management of the Management Board Report.
Diversity policy relating to the composition of the Management Board and senior leadership (Article 3a(d) Bib)
Information regarding the diversity and inclusion policy, including objectives, implementation and results during the reporting year, as well as the gender balance within senior management and the Management Board, is disclosed in the section Diversity and Inclusion of the Management Board Report.
Gender balance, targets and progress (Article 3d Bib in conjunction with Articles 2:166 and 2:276 Dutch Civil Code)
Information concerning the male‑female ratio, applicable gender balance targets, the plan to achieve or maintain such targets and, where applicable, reasons for not attaining targets is included in the section Diversity and Inclusion of the Management Board Report.
The Decree implementing Article 10 of the Dutch Takeover Directive (Besluit artikel 10 Overnamerichtlijn) does not apply to the Company. Consequently, the disclosure requirements of Article 3b of the Bib are not applicable.
Our aim is to reduce the likelihood of errors, wrong decisions and surprises due to unforeseen circumstances as much as possible. However, we cannot provide absolute certainty regarding the achievement of objectives and the impact of risks. It cannot be ruled out that we may be exposed to risks that are currently considered subordinate or are not recognised or insufficiently recognised. Moreover, no system of risk management and internal control can provide absolute assurance against failure to achieve business objectives, or for the complete prevention of loss, fraud and violations of laws and regulations.
Our professionals and internal staff worked diligently in 2025, once again delivering great results. We greatly admire their efforts and the development and growth they are experiencing. We would also like to thank the Works Council for their input and expert contribution. Furthermore, we thank our clients, shareholders and other stakeholders for the trust they have shown in us.
Amsterdam, 29 April 2026
Management Board of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V.
Jo Maes, Director
Yke Bonenberg, Director
Harry Arts, Director
Mersiha Janssen-Pezerović, Director
Kingsley Walker, Director
Ahead of the formal adoption of the CSRD into national legislation, we have chosen to implement the directive voluntarily. In 2025, Team EIFFEL prepared its sustainability statement in alignment with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), as adopted by the European Commission on 31 July 2023. As our understanding of the ESRS continues to evolve, future reporting periods may include additional clarifications and refinements. Furthermore, alongside the statutory audit of our financial statements, we voluntarily engaged Deloitte as our auditor to provide limited assurance on our sustainability statement.
We report at the level of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. for the fiscal year that ended on 31 December 2025. The scope of this sustainability report does not differ from the scope of the financial report.
This CSRD report of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. includes the Company and its subsidiaries (together “Team EIFFEL” or “the Group”). When we say “we”, “our” or “us”, we are referring to Team EIFFEL. No subsidiary entities within Team EIFFEL are exempt from this report, and we have chosen not to use any exemptions provided under Article 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU in the preparation of these sustainability statements. No relevant pieces of information have been omitted for reasons related to classified or sensitive information or intellectual property.
Furthermore, all entities are covered in the scope of the policies mentioned in this report. Where this is not the case, any exceptions are explicitly noted.
This report builds on the substantive feedback received from our auditor on the 2024 statement and incorporates an updated Double Materiality Assessment (DMA), which is now fully conducted in accordance with ESRS requirements to ensure a robust and transparent approach to identifying material topics. The preparation of this sustainability statement was carried out by Team EIFFEL. No external consultants or third parties were engaged in drafting or developing the content or metrics of this report, unless explicitly mentioned in the text. External involvement was limited to the independent assurance activities described in the chapters. Achieving this milestone reflects our ongoing commitment to high-quality, transparent, and reliable sustainability reporting, and we will continue to strengthen our practices as standards and expectations evolve.
The scope of this year's DMA spans all business activities, including internal operations and tier one suppliers and customers in the value chain. We are currently surveying the company's contractual arrangements, the degree of control it exercises over operations outside the scope of consolidation and its buyer power to gather (more) information from actors in its value chain. Any new learnings will be considered in the next DMA.
Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances
We apply the scoping of time as defined by ESRS 1 section 6.4 definition of short-, medium- and long-term for reporting purposes, which is the following:
Short term – one year: 2026
Medium term – two to five years: 2027-2030
Long term: after 2030
These time horizons are also used for our strategic planning regarding material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities (IRO).
Most quantitative data is derived directly from our internal data systems. Where alternative methods are applied to estimate or extrapolate data, such as for GHG emissions, this may introduce a degree of uncertainty. In such cases, the basis of preparation, the level of accuracy, and planned actions to further improve data quality are clearly disclosed in the detailed explanation of the relevant metric.
As disclosed in the chapter ‘Environment’, Scope 3 upstream emissions are calculated using a spend-based approach (euros), and no Scope 3 downstream emissions are applicable for Team EIFFEL.
When applying reporting requirements, Team EIFFEL is required to make certain judgements and estimates that may affect the reported data. This includes forward-looking information such as ambitions, objectives, targets and expectations. Actual outcomes may differ from these forward-looking statements, which are therefore inherently subject to uncertainty.
Where relevant, quantitative data in this report are accompanied by comparative information from the previous reporting period to support consistency and transparency. If definitions, methodologies or metric scopes have changed, this is explained in the text or in footnotes. Some changes have been made to metrics to fully comply with the ESRS.
This year’s sustainability statement has been prepared with reference to Article 29a of EU Directive 2013/34/EU, including compliance with the requirements of the ESRS. The EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment assessments are based on the latest applicable EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts adopted by the European Commission and in force as of 8 January 2026, including the Climate, Environmental, and amending Delegated Acts.
In line with ESRS 1, section 9.1, certain sustainability information is provided by means of references to the consolidated financial statements. Where information is sourced from the consolidated financial statements, this is clearly indicated in the text, including a reference to the relevant section. However, if we incorporate information from other references, we copied them in this sustainability statement, including their original reference. This ensures transparency and accessibility of the relevant sustainability information. We have chosen to incorporate some of the strategy and corporate governance disclosures from the cross-cutting standard ESRS 2 in other sections of this report, as the information is best read in close conjunction with other information in these sections.
Team EIFFEL has the following relevant certifications and/or hallmarks for all or some entities: ISO 9001/14001/27001, CO2 Performance Ladder (level 5), Safety Culture Ladder (level 3), EcoVadis and FSQS-NL. In this sustainability statement, the ESRS serves as our primary guide.

Figure 1: Certifications and quality marks
Team EIFFEL is the largest interim, consultancy and project management organisation in the Netherlands. Our strategy is shaped by our long-term ambition to contribute to a future-proof society, while enabling clients to accelerate performance and impact.
Team EIFFEL’s strategic objectives are influenced by a combination of internal ambitions and external expectations, including those of clients, employees, regulators and broader society. Public-sector clients increasingly expect progress, governance and transparency on ESG-related topics. Clients and contractors request stronger support in reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and improving environmental performance. Employees look to us to create both professional and societal impact.
Our ESG policy is based on three sustainability pillars: Environment, Social and Governance, aligned to selected UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These SDGs help structure our sustainability focus areas and guide our long-term ambitions.
Team EIFFEL’s business model integrates project-based delivery, consultancy and interim services across four operating segments, in line with IFRS 8 Operating Segments:
Finance Advisory
Engineering & Projectmanagement
Legal Advisory
Financial Services
Each segment represents distinct product and service groups, supported by specialised expertise and industry-specific know-how. A detailed cost structure and revenue overview per business line is included in our financial statements (in accordance with IFRS 8 and 15) and summarised in Table 1 below. As the indicative ESRS sector classifications have not yet been adopted, the phase‑in option is applied.
Business lines | Expertises | Markets | Annual revenue1 (in € thousands ) |
|---|---|---|---|
Finance Advisory | Financial control, business control, process optimisation, CSRD, dashboarding & analytics, reporting, compliance, governance, risk. | Municipalities, water authorities, ministries, independent administrative bodies, the private market, and education | 71,741 |
Engineering & Projects | Integrated project control, area development, environmental management, contract management, project management, technical management, subsidies, policy advisory, energy transition, mechanical engineering, electrical & instrumentation, construction management, draftsmen, work preparers, process engineering. | Infrastructure, mobility, water management, pharmaceuticals, industry, public space | 118,330 |
Legal Advisory | Objections & appeals, improper land use, recovery projects, municipal taxes, social domain, legal councils, privacy, Environment and Planning Act, permits, supervision & enforcement, legal process outsourcing, healthcare registration & accountability, policy advisory in healthcare. | Municipalities, water authorities, ministries, independent administrative bodies, the private market, hospitals, and healthcare institutions | 97,898 |
Financial Services & Compliance | Compliance, financing, mortgages, project management, KYC (Know Your Customer), pension transition, and recovery projects. | Banks, insurers, pension funds, administrators, accountancy, and law firms | 35,174 |
Total | 323,143 |
Table 1: Annual revenue per business line
In 2025, no significant change occurred in Team EIFFEL’s product and service groups. The integration of the newly acquired company Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries expanded our service capabilities in Engineering, but did not fundamentally alter the structure of our main product and service groups. Changes in significant customer groups or markets during the reporting period were minimal.
Team EIFFEL does not have any sustainability-related goals for, and did not conduct an assessment related to its current significant groups of products and services, customer categories and geographical areas.
Team EIFFEL determines whether a product or service group, customer segment or ESRS sector is significant based on the ESRS criteria of:
Contributing more than 10% of annual revenue, and/or
Being associated with material actual or potential negative impacts, as identified through our DMA
Because the ESRS sector is the same for all Team EIFFEL’s business lines, it means that this ESRS sector covers more than 10% of the annual revenue and all the material IROs
Team EIFFEL’s workforce composition is provided in the Social chapter. In accordance with ESRS 2, the company discloses the geographical distribution of employees as follows: all employees of Team EIFFEL are located in the Netherlands; the company does not operate in other jurisdictions.
Our value creation model, developed using the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) framework, illustrates how Team EIFFEL transforms key resources — financial, human, intellectual, and relationship capital — into high-quality services for clients, stakeholders and society. It shows how our inputs (capital resources) are converted through our key activities (throughput) into outputs (services) and long-term outcomes (stakeholder and societal impact). Our responsibility within the value chain ceases once a professional has provided their advice to the client. How the client subsequently acts upon that advice is beyond our influence.

Figure 2: Value creation model
In delivering our services, Team EIFFEL relies on core inputs such as talent, expertise, partner networks, data and financial capital. Team EIFFEL gathered quantitative information on key resources (input) through consulting various internal departments (Financial, Facility, Mobility, HR and Learning and Development). Team EIFFEL secures qualitative inputs through:
Human capital:
Structured and data-driven recruitment process, continuous learning & development in the Team EIFFEL Academy, employer branding programs, and long-term retention practices.
Intellectual capital:
Knowledge-sharing communities, internal expert groups within the business lines, and digital (AI-based) tooling.
Financial capital:
Disciplined financial planning, strategic investment processes and alignment with IFRS 8 cost and revenue structures.
Relationship capital:
Long-term collaborations with clients, suppliers, universities and oversight institutions.
Our value creation model is checked and updated every year. Therefore, potential (other) future GHG-emission drivers are identified in the early stages. From 2026 onwards, we will incorporate a check to see if there are specific assets or business activities that would be incompatible with a transition to a climate-neutral economy.
We interact with our stakeholders to seek their opinions and their expectations. This process allows us to define a timely and adequate response to the issues they deem important for our business and for our ability to make an impact that matters. As we believe that challenges are best solved together, we work with other parties in our value chain, such as our suppliers, clients, collaboration partners and oversight bodies. We leverage strategic partnerships, colleagues across the network, digitalisation and a quality mindset as inputs for providing our services. A quality mindset involves considering the context in which we operate, as well as the applicable laws and regulations for every client engagement.

Figure 3: Value chain
In accordance with ESRS, Team EIFFEL identifies the following key relationships:
Upstream: Mobility, Facility partners, Digital providers, Training institutes
Core: Employees, Central Works Council (CWC), Supervisory board/ Shareholders
Downstream: Public sector, Financial institutions, Utilities
The defining characteristics of these relationships relate to reliability, continuity, compliance requirements and access to specialised expertise.
At Team EIFFEL, we believe in open, constructive and continuous dialogue with the stakeholders who are most affected by, or who can significantly influence, our sustainability performance. Stakeholder engagement is an integral part of our due diligence process, materiality assessment and strategy formation.
As part of our ISO 9001:2015 certification, Team EIFFEL conducted a systematic context and stakeholder analysis. This served as the foundation for the stakeholder assessment used in this sustainability statement. We identify the following stakeholder groups as the most significant based on their level of influence, their exposure to potential impacts and their relevance to sustainability-related risks and opportunities:

Figure 4: Key stakeholders, relevance and key topics
Understanding the interests and perspectives of our stakeholders is essential for us to fulfil our purpose. Engaging in dialogue to comprehend the effects of our actions and business relationships on stakeholders throughout the value chain is a key component of this process. Relevant stakeholder categories include ‘key figures’ (employees, shareholders/ management board, CWC, etc.), ‘influencers’ (collaboration partners, former employees, etc.), ‘interested parties’ (insurers, pension funds, banks, bond holders, mobility partners, etc.) and ‘spectators’ (press, industry organisations, etc.).
Through structured dialogues, interviews, surveys, consultations and ongoing interactions, Team EIFFEL collects stakeholder views on sustainability matters. We strive to ensure all stakeholder voices are heard, and we are actively working to address this challenge through specific engagement methods together with our Marketing and Communication departments. We are committed to ongoing improvement in stakeholder engagement and believe transparency is key. Currently, no targets are in place. In 2026, new targets will be set, and stakeholder input will be reconsidered.
In 2025, Team EIFFEL engaged with the following stakeholders:
TowerBrook (shareholder): Team EIFFEL informed TowerBrook about our voluntary CSRD report 2024. Team EIFFEL also consulted with TowerBrook about our new material IROs for the CSRD report 2025.
Employees and CWC: Team EIFFEL conducted a survey among employees and the CWC about what they consider relevant topics. Those relevant topics were already filtered by the subject matter experts on Environment, Social and Governance.
Clients: Team EIFFEL conducted one interview with a client about our CSRD-report and our CO2-footprint, goals and measures. We streamlined this interview with the demands of the CO2-Performance Ladder.
While Team EIFFEL actively engages with multiple stakeholders, the information collected to date may not fully represent all relevant stakeholder perspectives. As stakeholder familiarity with the ESRS and/or ESG evolves, we expect the quality, depth and breadth of input to increase. Team EIFFEL is committed to ongoing improvement, strengthening transparency and enhancing the integration of stakeholder views into future reporting cycles.
Team EIFFEL makes selected sustainability-related information available to relevant external stakeholders. General sustainability-related information is shared with external stakeholders through our sustainability statement. Internal policies are communicated directly to relevant employees and business partners where necessary to ensure effective implementation and compliance.
Through the CWC and internal experts, employee insights directly informed the prioritisation of our most material sustainability topics, as disclosed in the DMA. While no structural changes were made to the business model in 2025 as a direct result of stakeholder views, these insights influenced:
The refinement of our sustainability pillars (Environment, Social and Governance)
Alignment of policy and due diligence activities on human rights and environmental matters
The design of our value-creation model and impact measurement approach
Team EIFFEL will continue to include stakeholder perspectives in the strategy cycle and expects stakeholder input to influence future developments in services, partnerships and governance processes. To strengthen our stakeholder engagement, some improvements are planned in 2026:
Structural satisfaction survey among internal employees
Developing an annual stakeholder survey focused on sustainability questions
Establishing a more formalised stakeholder panel or advisory group
Enhancing collaboration with clients and partners on shared sustainability themes
At this moment, Team EIFFEL does not intend to modify its relationship with or the views of its stakeholders on sustainability matters.
Stakeholder insights are communicated to Team EIFFEL’s governance bodies via:
Monthly or quarterly sustainability updates to the Management Board
Reports and formal consultations from the CWC
Input for the annual strategic planning cycle
Materiality updates provided by the CSRD Project Team
Risk and compliance reports highlighting stakeholder concerns
These mechanisms ensure that the administrative, management and supervisory bodies have visibility into stakeholder expectations and the potential impacts on strategy, risk management and long-term value creation.
In 2025, Team EIFFEL conducted a renewed DMA as the core of its sustainability strategy. This year, employees were actively involved in the DMA, giving them a direct voice in determining material topics.
Since we conducted the DMA this year in line with the ESRS, the material topics differ this year compared to last year. The DMA is reviewed annually, and if significant developments occur within the organisation, the assessment will be updated accordingly. This year's assessment provides a structured understanding of the topics most relevant to the governance of the organisation, its environment and the society. By being transparent regarding the IROs associated with these topics, the organisation ensures that efforts and resources are directed towards areas of significance. The scope of the DMA spans all business activities, including internal operations and tier one suppliers and customers in the value chain. This includes both supplier relationships in the upstream and customer engagements in the downstream. This comprehensive approach ensures maximum impact for our stakeholders and reinforces the organisation's contribution to a sustainable future.
The methodology applied for the DMA is fully aligned with the ESRS, ensuring consistency and completeness throughout the process. The initial phase involved mapping the organisation’s activities and identifying key stakeholders. The stakeholders’ influence and interests were analysed and visualised in a stakeholder matrix, which now serves as a strategic tool for engaging those most closely connected to the sustainability agenda. Throughout this process, consideration was also given to silent stakeholders, including nature.
Building on this foundation, a comprehensive longlist of sustainability topics was developed based on the ESRS framework as provided by ESRS 1 and supported by peer benchmarking to ensure full thematic coverage across the value chain. Subsequently, internal expert sessions were organised to review the ESRS-based longlist. During the initial expert sessions, the impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) associated with each topic on the longlist were identified. During the following sessions, the topics were further refined and prioritised, while the initially identified impacts, risks and opportunities (IROs) were validated. This process resulted in a consolidated shortlist of sustainability topics.
The shortlisted topics, together with their associated IROs, were then assessed by internal experts to determine their materiality. The evaluation of IROs was conducted jointly with internal experts and the CWC, supported by dedicated expert groups. Given the nature of Team EIFFEL’s activities, employees were identified as the primary stakeholder group in assessing potential adverse impacts. All topics were assessed using a five‑point Likert scale for both impact materiality and financial materiality. A threshold was applied to the resulting scores. Topics, including their associated IROs, that scored above this threshold are considered material and are therefore included in the sustainability statement.
This assessment resulted in the identification of the organisation’s material sustainability topics and their corresponding IROs. Next to the topics that we identified as material, we have determined that the following topics are not material to us and, consequently, the corresponding ESRS requirements are not included in our sustainability statement: Pollution (ESRS E2), Water and marine resources (ESRS E3), Biodiversity and ecosystems (ESRS E4), Resource use and circular economy (ESRS E5), Workers in the value chain (S2), Affected communities (ESRS S3) and Consumer and end-users (S4). No additional consultation sessions were held apart from the expert sessions during the DMA process . For these topics, no screening of our assets, on-site locations or business activities was conducted to identify associated impacts, risks or opportunities. Similarly, no dedicated research was undertaken into our dependencies, impacts or potential (systemic) risks and opportunities in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems specifically. Furthermore, we have not researched whether our sites are located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas. Nonetheless, we assume that due to the nature of our activities, Team EIFFEL does not negatively affect such areas. Due to no further research, we can not conclude whether it is necessary to implement biodiversity mitigation measures.
Impact materiality reflects the organisation’s influence on the external world. This impact materiality was evaluated using four criteria: scope, which refers to the breadth of the impact; scale, which indicates the magnitude; likelihood, which measures the probability of occurrence; and irremediability, which assesses the extent to which the impact is irreversible. The irremediability criteria were only scored when the impact was negative. Each criterion was scored using the Likert scale, enabling a structured and consistent analysis of both positive and negative effects.
Financial materiality considers how external developments may affect Team EIFFEL. These risks and opportunities were assessed based on magnitude and likelihood and evaluated using the five-point Likert scale. This dual-materiality approach ensures a balanced view of sustainability topics, integrating both societal relevance and financial significance.
To complement the expert analysis and strengthen internal engagement, a targeted survey was conducted among employees and the CWC to gather their views on the relevance of each topic. The results were incorporated into the final assessment to ensure that internal perspectives were reflected. All inputs from experts, employees, and the CWC were consolidated into a weighted composite score. Topics exceeding the determined threshold were classified as material and now form the core of Team EIFFEL’s sustainability strategy. The analysis and the outcome of the DMA were subsequently validated and approved by the relevant stakeholders.
The outcomes of the DMA are presented in Figure 5, providing an overview of the material topics and their corresponding ESRS requirements. These material topics form the basis of the Sustainability Statement 2025. Figure 6 further details the sub-topics covered within each material topic. For the metrics associated with the topics “Employment conditions: health and safety” and “Learning and development”, we make use of the phase-in possibility.

Figure 5: DMA Results

Figure 6: Material topics and belonging sub-topics
In the business line plans, risks, opportunities, and threats are identified, and these plans ultimately form the basis for the corporate plan at the Team EIFFEL level. Many of the risks and opportunities outlined in these plans correspond, in several areas, to the IRO included in the DMA, for example, those related to staff turnover, absenteeism, and employee retention. Although there is some overlap, the two processes are not integrated.
Figure 7 provides an overview of the IROs for each material topic. It also specifies the corresponding time horizons, which indicate the period in which the impact is expected to occur, whether the impact is positive or negative, and it identifies the areas within the organisation where these IROs take place. This contextualises how the identified risks and opportunities relate to the broader organisational landscape.

Figure 7: Material topics and IROs
Based on the information currently available, any financial effects recognised to date are deemed not material. In addition, for potential future financial effects, the phase-in possibility will be used, meaning Team EIFFEL will start reporting on this from next year on. In particular, Team EIFFEL does not yet have insight into whether, and to what extent, these IROs could lead to a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities within the next annual reporting periods.
Effective governance and decision-making in the field of sustainability requires a clear understanding of the composition, responsibilities and expertise of the company's administrative, management and supervisory bodies. The term refers to the key governing structures of Team EIFFEL, including those responsible for day-to-day operations (management), overall strategic direction and decision-making (administrative), and oversight and control functions (supervisory).
Team EIFFEL is governed by a Management Board consisting of five members (40% of our Management Board is independent) and a separate Supervisory Board also consisting of five members. These members bring a broad mix of national and international experience across financial services, the staffing and secondment industry, consultancy, private equity, mergers and acquisitions, legal domains, and organisational strategy and growth; areas in which Team EIFFEL operates.
As at 31 December 2025, the gender balance within the Management Board and the Supervisory Board is 1/9 (female/ male), compared to 0/10 (female/ male) as at 31 December 2024. The balance within the Executive Management Team (10 members) at 31 December 2025 is 2/8 (female/ male), compared to 2/8 (female/ male) as at 31 December 2024. Beyond gender, Team EIFFEL also considers age, educational background, international experience and professional expertise when composing its governing bodies, thereby striving to ensure that its administrative, management and supervisory bodies reflect a diverse and experienced leadership structure.
The CWC represents all the employees of Team EIFFEL and consists of employees from the various labels within Team EIFFEL. The CWC maintains regular dialogue with the Management Board, including on sustainability matters. The Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO) attends four meetings per year with the CWC. Two of them are also attended by the Supervisory Board. Apart from the CWC, employees are not directly represented within governing bodies.
The Management Board has ultimate responsibility for sustainability oversight, setting the strategic direction, approving related targets, and ensuring alignment with the overall business strategy. In 2025, a dedicated Sustainability Steering Committee was established, composed of members of the Management Board, the Quality Department and Reporting. The committee provides guidance, ensures alignment and integration, and reviews progress on material sustainability topics and IROs within the corporate strategy. The committee is informed monthly by the CSRD Project Team, which leads the implementation of ESRS requirements, including the stakeholder analysis, due diligence, and the development of insights into policies, actions, targets and metrics covered in this sustainability statement. The project team is supported by internal ESG subject-matter experts. The board uses the internal ESG subject matter experts for expertise on overall sustainability topics.
Sustainability performance updates and risk assessments are discussed directly within the Sustainability Steering Committee, in which one member of the Management Board participates, ensuring direct Board-level oversight on a monthly basis.
In 2025, Team EIFFEL created the internal department Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A). This department is responsible for the process of acquiring companies. Team EIFFEL considers acquisitions as major transactions. Part of the process is the due diligence (DD) phase. In this phase, review takes place on ‘hard’ subjects like finance, legal and corporate culture and IT, but also on ‘soft’ subjects like culture and employment conditions.
From 2026 onwards, Team EIFFEL will further formalise how its administrative, management and supervisory bodies monitor and review goals related to material IROs. This will include documentation of the oversight process within internal mandates and governance charters, as well as the introduction of specific management controls, procedures for monitoring ESG-related risks and data quality and individual responsibilities in formal terms of reference.
In addition to the material IROs identified in the DMA, our administrative, management and supervisory bodies also addressed other topics during 2025:
• Integration of new companies
• Employee turnover and absenteeism
• Fraud risk
• Sensitivity to economic cycles
• Increasing competition
• Customer dependency
• Liability for services not (or not properly) delivered
• Credit risk
• Non-compliance with financial reporting guidelines
• Technological developments
• Data leaks, data loss, security and continuity
Currently, we do not have compensation schemes directly linked to sustainability performance for the members of the governance, executive, and supervisory bodies. While sustainability is a core aspect of our business strategy, it is not formally integrated into our compensation structure. We recognise the growing importance of aligning remuneration with sustainability goals and are considering if and how to best incorporate sustainability performance into our future compensation policies.
To identify and address potential or actual negative impacts within our value chain, Team EIFFEL conducts due diligence on environmental and human-rights issues. This process involves continuous evaluation of both actual and potential impacts our business may have on people and the environment. It includes integrating and responding to findings, monitoring progress, and transparently communicating how these impacts are managed.
A Supplier Code of Conduct (CoC) is being established to define sustainability expectations toward suppliers, including social and environmental standards.
To enhance transparency, Team EIFFEL provides the following mapping of its due diligence process and where the relevant information can be found within this report:
Core elements of due diligence | Paragraphs in the sustainability statement |
|---|---|
Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model | Paragraphs “Statement on due diligence” & “Corporate culture & Code of Conduct” |
Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the due diligence | Paragraphs “Stakeholder interests and sustainability views” & “Influence of stakeholder views on strategy and planned improvements to engagement” |
Identifying and assessing adverse impacts | Paragraph “Double Materiality Assessment 2025” |
Taking actions to address those adverse impacts | Paragraph “Strategy” |
Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating | Paragraph “Risk management and internal controls” |
Table 2: Due diligence process
Due diligence remains a continuous process. Team EIFFEL will continue to refine its approach, engage stakeholders, and disclose progress in future sustainability reports.
Team EIFFEL recognises that environmental, social, and governance issues can present strategic and operational risks. We actively manage these risks to enhance long-term resilience and create value for our stakeholders. ESG risks are identified through risk assessments, monitoring of industry developments and stakeholder engagement. Each risk is evaluated based on its likelihood and potential impact on our business and stakeholders. Typical risks include those arising from shifting stakeholder expectations and evolving regulation.
The company maintains a structured risk-management and internal-control system related to sustainability reporting. Key features include:
Clearly defined responsibilities for ESG risk identification and monitoring within the Quality and Finance functions;
Integrated risk prioritisation methodology aligning with the enterprise risk-management (ERM) framework;
Documentation and mitigation of key ESG risks, including associated control measures; and
Periodic internal reporting of control findings to the Board and the Audit & Sustainability Committee
In addition to defining mitigation measures, Team EIFFEL applies specific control mechanisms to monitor the effectiveness of these measures. The progress and effectiveness of improvement actions are monitored on an ongoing basis within the operational line by the responsible managers. Employee-related mitigation measures are periodically evaluated through three-monthly pulse measurements using the employee Net Promoter Score (e-NPS) methodology. Customer-related improvement measures are assessed annually through Net Promoter Score (NPS) measurements to evaluate client satisfaction and the effectiveness of implemented actions. The outcomes of these monitoring activities are used to determine whether mitigation measures remain appropriate or require adjustment.
Findings arising from sustainability-related risk assessments and internal controls are systematically translated into actions and improvements within relevant internal functions and processes. These findings are reviewed through internal and external audit activities, including audits performed in the context of ISO 9001 certification. In addition, management reviews are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of processes, controls and improvement actions. Outcomes of audits and management reviews are documented and translated into follow-up actions, responsibilities and timelines. Policies, procedures and improvement actions resulting from risk assessments, audits and management reviews are recorded and maintained within the Team EIFFEL Management System. This management system provides a structured framework for documenting processes, monitoring implementation and ensuring consistent application across the organisation.
Robust internal controls are essential to ensure the accuracy, reliability and consistency of sustainability information. Team EIFFEL has implemented standardised procedures for the collection, validation and consolidation of sustainability data. These procedures are applied across our operating entities and business labels and are subject to periodic review through internal control activities and audit processes.
Key findings related to sustainability-related risks, internal controls and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies are periodically reported to the Management Board and the Audit & Sustainability Committee as part of regular governance, risk and performance reporting cycles.
Climate change is one of the defining challenges of our time, with rising global temperatures, extreme weather events, and regulatory requirements reshaping the business landscape. The ESRS emphasise the need for transparency in climate-related impacts, risks, and opportunities.
At Team EIFFEL, we are committed to ensuring future generations have the same opportunities to develop their talents fully, unhindered by the environmental burden of our current success. Our reduction activities focus on varying solutions, such as adjusting our vehicle fleet, buildings and behavioural changes. We also seek to involve our supply chain in these goals and raise awareness to amplify our impact.
At Team EIFFEL, we view the transition to a climate-neutral economy not only as a regulatory obligation but as a strategic opportunity to future-proof our operations, enhance our value to clients, and contribute meaningfully to a sustainable society. Our climate strategy is anchored in the principles of transparency, impact reduction, and continuous improvement.
We have embedded climate considerations into our operations by aligning our environmental management with ESRS. This includes assessing and reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), defining reduction targets, and integrating climate risks and opportunities into our decision-making. The main focus of our emission reduction strategy, with regard to our value chain, is our upstream partners (facility and mobility) and employees in the Netherlands. Our climate strategy does not address matters, nor do we set targets beyond climate change mitigation, energy efficiency and renewable energy deployment. In parallel, we support our clients with sustainability consulting services - enabling them to achieve similar objectives, from regulatory compliance to long-term decarbonisation. This chapter outlines our commitment to:
Climate Risk & Adaptation
Assessing transition risks to ensure business resilience and regulatory alignment.
GHG Emission Reduction
Through tracking and mitigating our Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
Decarbonisation Strategy
Reducing our carbon footprint through adjusting our vehicle fleet, buildings and behavioural changes.
Our Climate Services
Through data-driven insights, regulatory expertise, and strategic implementation, we aim to go beyond compliance, helping businesses integrate climate action into their core strategy while driving long-term value creation.
In the paragraph ‘Material topics and IROs’, we disclose which IROs are addressed with our overall climate change management policies.
In 2025, we updated our climate scenario analysis to better understand the potential impacts of climate change on our operations and the broader business environment.
The analysis is based on two distinct scenarios:
Net Zero 2050 (Orderly/Ambitious): This scenario envisions a proactive global effort to limit warming to 1.5°C by 2050. Governments collaborate to implement coordinated climate policies, while the transition to efficient technologies and renewable energy is achieved smoothly. Besides that, carbon dioxide removals are moderately used to balance emissions where reductions are more challenging.
Risks and disruptions remain low, making this scenario both economically manageable and environmentally sustainable.
Current policies (Pessimistic): This scenario assumes limited policy responses, with global temperatures rising by up to 3°C by the end of the century. Fossil fuels continue to dominate the energy sector, with minimal adjustments to low-carbon technologies. As a result, severe physical risks increase, including extreme weather events, sea-level rise and damage to existing ecosystems and infrastructure.
This scenario describes the costs of inaction, with significant risks to public health, biodiversity and economic stability.
The analysis method considered transition risks (e.g., policy, technology and consumer preference shifts) and physical risks (e.g., chronic changes like rising temperatures and acute events like heatwaves or floods). These were evaluated through macro- and microeconomic transmission channels to financial levels.
Table 3 below summarises the identified preliminary climate-related risks and opportunities. When identifying these climate-related risks and opportunities, we did not take into account the likelihood, magnitude and duration of the hazards on our assets and business activities. The risks and opportunities are categorised into short (<1 year), medium (2 – 5 years) and long-term (>5 years). The climate scenarios, risk assessment and time frame are in line with assumptions provided by the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) and ESRS. This comprehensive assessment enables us to explore mitigation strategies, thereby enhancing business resilience in the face of evolving climate-related risks.
Risk/Opportunity | Type (Transition/Physical) | Timeframe | Business impact definition | Value chain impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Opportunity: Talent Attraction and Retention Risk: Reduced potential to attract and retain talent because of an inadequate response to climate change. | Transition: Reputation | Short to medium term Net Zero 2050 (Orderly/Ambitious) | Climate action and sustainability are viewed as essential reputational factors for retaining and attracting top talent, especially among younger professionals prioritising environmental impact. In 2025, 39.7% of our total workforce is younger than 30 years old. | Core: workforce |
Risk: Reputation and client relationships | Transition: Reputation | Short to medium term Net Zero 2050 (Orderly/Ambitious) | Failing to address climate change or aligning with poor climate-performing clients can harm Team EIFFEL's reputation, impacting client retention and future revenue growth. | Downstream: clients |
Risk: Inability to meet public and self-imposed climate targets. | Transition: Policy and Legal / Reputation | Short to medium term Current policies (Pessimistic) | Team EIFFEL is unlikely to face significant compliance risks from climate-related regulations. However, inability to meet self-imposed targets can lead to stakeholder concerns, reputational damage and loss in revenue. | Whole value chain |
Opportunity: Sustainability services | Transition: Market | Short/medium/long term Net Zero 2050 (Orderly/Ambitious) | Growing demand for decarbonisation, climate risk assessment, sustainability reporting, technological changes (AI, RPA, etc.) and other sustainability-related services enhance the possibility of revenue generation and client acquisition. Assisting clients in vulnerable sectors (e.g., energy, utilities) with climate adaptation strengthens client relationships. | Downstream: clients |
Table 3: Risks, opportunities and mitigation strategies for the transition plan
At the moment, there are no insights into the financial effects and no concrete mitigation responses for the aforementioned transition and physical risks and opportunities. Because there are no concrete mitigation responses, there is no dedicated budget to mitigate the risks and opportunities. In 2026, the mitigation responses will be formulated.
For Team EIFFEL, an asset-light business model means deliberately limiting the ownership of physical assets to stay flexible and cost-efficient. By relying on adaptable solutions rather than fixed assets, the organisation can scale more easily and respond quickly to changing needs. In practice, this mainly concerns reducing owned office space and outsourcing the company's leased cars. This approach allows Team EIFFEL to focus investments on people, expertise, and sustainable growth.
Based on the information currently available, any financial effects recognised to date are deemed not material. In addition, for potential future financial effects, the phase-in possibility will be used, meaning Team EIFFEL will start reporting on this from next year on. In particular, Team EIFFEL does not yet have insight into whether, and to what extent, these IROs could lead to a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities within the next annual reporting periods.
We are a leading interim, consultancy, and project organisation in the Netherlands, specialising in providing strategic solutions across various sectors. Our commitment to sustainability is integral to our mission, guiding governments and organisations toward a sustainable future.
Sustainable Project Management
We excel in project management and process improvement within the physical living environment, collaborating with clients to create a sustainable future for the Netherlands. Our impact spans accessibility, mobility, energy transition, and quality of life, offering realistic solutions to contemporary complex challenges.
Energy Transition Advisory
Our expertise extends to guiding organisations through energy transition, developing strategies that align with environmental goals and regulatory requirements. We assist in implementing renewable energy solutions and optimising energy efficiency.
Area Development and Urban Planning
We engage in area development projects, linking developments and improvements with organisational objectives to promote sustainable urban planning and community development.
Integrated Project Management
Our integrated project management services encompass cost control, quality assurance, and risk mapping, ensuring that sustainability considerations are embedded throughout the project lifecycle.
At Team EIFFEL, we believe that integrating sustainability into business practices is essential for long-term success and resilience. Our comprehensive services are designed to help organisations navigate the complexities of sustainable development, ensuring compliance with evolving regulations and contributing positively to society and the environment.
The EU Taxonomy provides a harmonised classification system to identify economic activities that contribute to the environmental objectives of the European Union. For Team EIFFEL, the Taxonomy forms an integral part of the organisation’s preparations for CSRD reporting. As a result, the organisation already reports on the Taxonomy on a voluntary basis. This assessment covers turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx), providing a comprehensive view of Team EIFFEL’s Taxonomy‑eligible activities. In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, the detailed EU Taxonomy disclosures are provided below.
Team EIFFEL’s reporting on EU Taxonomy activities is based on Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as supplemented by the relevant Commission Delegated Regulations. These include Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2485, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2486, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73, which is applicable as of 8 January 2026.
The EU Taxonomy Regulation establishes a standardized and mandatory classification system to determine which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. In accordance with this framework, companies are required to disclose how and to what extent their activities are associated with taxonomy‑eligible and taxonomy‑aligned economic activities. Although the regulatory framework is comprehensive, certain aspects of the EU Taxonomy continue to evolve and may still be subject to interpretation. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73 amends Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 with regard to the simplification of the content and presentation of EU Taxonomy disclosures. In addition, it amends Delegated Regulations (EU) 2021/2139 and (EU) 2023/2486 by simplifying selected technical screening criteria used to assess whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectives.
Under the EU Taxonomy Regulation, an economic activity can be considered taxonomy‑aligned if it substantially contributes to at least one of the six environmental objectives, while not significantly harming any of the remaining objectives and while meeting minimum safeguards related to human rights and labour standards. The six environmental objectives defined under the EU Taxonomy are:
Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
Transition to a circular economy
Pollution prevention and control
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems
The Delegated Acts adopted under the EU Taxonomy Regulation specify detailed technical screening criteria that must be met to assess both substantial contribution and the absence of significant harm to other environmental objectives. For each relevant economic activity, Team EIFFEL assesses whether the activity is taxonomy‑eligible and, where applicable, in the future, taxonomy‑aligned. The outcomes of this assessment are reflected in the reported proportions of turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx), and operating expenditure (OpEx).
The scope of this assessment was limited to those parts of Team EIFFEL’s activities that may fall within the EU Taxonomy. As the organisation primarily provides advisory and project management services, the majority of technical and physical Taxonomy activities are out of scope. To assess whether Team EIFFEL’s activities are eligible under the EU Taxonomy, we identified those activities most likely to be relevant to the organisation. Several activities were selected for assessment under turnover and CapEx, while no activities were identified as relevant for OpEx.
Professional services with a potential link to Activity 9.3 (under Climate Mitigation), relating to professional services that contribute to building energy performance, Activity 9.1 (under Climate Adaptation), relating to engineering and technical consultancy for climate adaptation, and Activity 9.3 (under Climate Adaptation), relating to consultancy for physical climate risk management and adaptation, have been assessed for turnover. For CapEx, only lease‑related assets were recognised under IFRS 16; specifically, office locations and the vehicle fleet are included. OpEx was only considered when operational expenditure relates directly to Taxonomy‑eligible activities; no such activities were identified.
In the reporting year 2025, the assessment was limited to determining the eligibility of Team EIFFEL’s activities under the EU Taxonomy. Team EIFFEL identified two Taxonomy‑eligible activities within CapEx: (i) activities relating to the acquisition and ownership of buildings (CCM 7.7), and (ii) economic activities relating to transport by motorbikes, passenger cars and commercial vehicles (CCM 6.5). However, the related CapEx is not considered material to Team EIFFEL’s business model, which primarily focuses on the provision of people‑based professional services rather than capital‑intensive activities. Team EIFFEL estimates that its core activities would be able to continue if these activities (CCM 6.5 and 7.7) were to stop. In addition, sufficient information to assess compliance with the technical screening criteria, minimum safeguards and do‑no‑significant‑harm requirements was not available. Given that these activities are deemed non‑material as well as the data limitations, the activities are reported as not-aligned.
The assessment covered consultancy services generating revenue and assets recognised as CapEx during the reporting period. The EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment assessments are based on the latest applicable EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts adopted by the European Commission and in force as of 8 January 2026, including the Climate, Environmental, and amending Delegated Acts. Furthermore, for the allocation of Turnover, CapEx and OpEx, relevant measures and primary economic activities under the Climate Delegated Act were identified, and procedures were applied to ensure no double counting occurred.
For more information on the accounting policies applied in this report, see note 3 Material accounting policies of our consolidated financial statements.
Turnover was assessed by reviewing whether the nature and objectives of consultancy services corresponded with activities defined under the EU Taxonomy, specifically Activities 9.3 (CM), 9.1 (CA) and 9.3 (CA). It is important to note that Team EIFFEL primarily provides advisory and project management services, without direct physical implementation. Therefore, activities such as construction, installation, or maintenance (e.g., activities 7.1, 7.3, 7.6 under Climate Mitigation/Adaptation) were excluded from the scope.
Turnover was only considered eligible where the services delivered could be clearly linked to climate mitigation or adaptation objectives as defined in the EU Taxonomy Regulation. The proportion of potential Taxonomy‑eligible economic activities in our total turnover has been calculated as the share of net turnover derived from services associated with Taxonomy‑eligible activities (numerator), divided by our net turnover (denominator) for the financial year. For a further breakdown of the turnover KPI, please refer to disclosure note 8 of the financial statement.
With reference to the definition as per Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy, Team EIFFEL considered all the categories of CapEx. Within the categories, Team EIFFEL assesses the following two EUT-activities in relation to CapEx:
The activities relating to the acquisition and ownership of buildings (7.7); CapEx covers the lease costs accounted under IFRS 16. Therefore, this is classified as an eligible activity within the CapEx.
The economic activities relating to the transport by motorbikes, passenger cars and commercial vehicles (6.5): As CapEx covers the lease costs accounted under IFRS 16. Therefore, this is classified as an eligible activity within the CapEx.
Given that lease costs are allocated as CapEx and no other eligible operational expenditures have been identified, Team EIFFEL does not conduct any OpEx-related eligible activities.
The acquisition and management of buildings is considered an EU Taxonomy-eligible activity. While the purchase and ownership of buildings is not part of Team EIFFEL’s core services, the organisation considers the leasing of buildings as consistent with this definition. The management of these single-tenant buildings is regarded as an EU Taxonomy-eligible activity because they represent the biggest leased spaces and, as the sole tenant, Team EIFFEL has greater control and influence over building operations and sustainability measures compared to multi-tenant locations. Team EIFFEL also considers the leasing of vehicles as consistent with the definition of activity 6.5. The leasing of vehicles falls under CapEx and is eligible within the EU Taxonomy.
For the denominator in the CapEx KPI, we included additions to tangible and intangible fixed assets during the financial year, considering acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary and excluding depreciation and amortization. For a further breakdown of the CapEx KPI, please refer to disclosure notes 16 and 17 of the financial statement. Together, the sum of these additions reconcile to the total CapEx figure reported in this section of the report and ensure consistency between the financial statements and the sustainability reporting.
With regard to the numerator, this consists of the costs related to the leasing of the vehicle fleet and the leasing costs of office buildings. For the costs relating to the leasing of the vehicle fleet we refer to category "Cars" in disclosure note 17. The costs related to buildings are not disaggregated at an individual asset level within this disclosure note. Instead, expenses associated with leased and owned buildings are aggregated and reported under the cost category 'Office buildings' in the tangible fixed assets. This aggregation is applied to ensure consistency with the financial reporting structure. An overview of these costs is provided in the table included in disclosure note 17. For our numerator, only the costs related to the office buildings in Arnhem and Hilversum were relevant, which are not separately disclosed because of this aggregation.
The OpEx KPI is calculated as Taxonomy-aligned OpEx (numerator) divided by total OpEx (denominator). In accordance with the EU Taxonomy definition, total OpEx comprises direct, non-capitalised costs related to the leasing of cars and buildings. In addition, the Taxonomy Regulation considers OpEx that is directly attributable to CapEx required for the transition to more sustainable operations to be eligible. See the provided table for the breakdown of Team EIFFEL’s OpEx:
Description | Total amount |
Lease costs (rental cars) | € 9,523.45 |
Car rental expenses | € 518,475.78 |
Building repair and maintenance | € 144,177.30 |
Inventory maintenance | € 14,800.53 |
Total denominator | € 686,977.06 |
Table 4: Operational Expenses breakdown
OpEx was assessed as not material to Team EIFFEL’s business model. Consequently, lease costs recognised as OpEx were not assessed for EU Taxonomy eligibility and are therefore not reported as Taxonomy‑eligible activities.
The assessment indicates that the majority of Team EIFFEL’s consultancy services do not fall within the scope of EU Taxonomy-eligible activities. The analysis shows that Team EIFFEL’s services are predominantly advisory, technical or process-oriented and do not primarily aim to improve building energy performance or to implement climate adaptation measures as defined under the EU Taxonomy.
A limited number of services were, however, identified as EU Taxonomy-eligible, as they involved direct technical contributions to improving the energy performance of buildings or providing adaptation-related technical advice. These services fall within the scope of Activity 9.3 (CM) and Activity 9.1 (CA). The results indicate that Team EIFFEL does not conduct any activities related to activity 9.3 (CA). The resulting EU Taxonomy-eligible turnover represents an immaterial portion of total turnover, amounting to less than 0.1%. Due to this immateriality, Team EIFFEL does not report EU Taxonomy-eligible turnover. The activities deemed non-material are related to the professional services and engineering sectors.
With respect to CapEx, office buildings used exclusively by Team EIFFEL were classified under Activity 7.7, as these lease arrangements provide influence over the use and operation of the buildings. Lease contracts relating to the vehicle fleet were classified under Activity 6.5. The CapEx-related activities exceed the 10% threshold and are therefore broken down in the tables below. As noted, these activities are not considered material to Team EIFFEL’s business operations and, due to data limitations, are consequently classified as not aligned.
2025 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KPI | Total | Proportion of Taxonomy-eligible activities | Taxonomy-aligned activities | Proportion of Taxonomy-aligned activities | Breakdown by environmental objectives of Taxonomy-aligned activities | Proportion of Enabling activities | Porportion of Transitional activities | Not assessed activities considered non-material | Taxonomy-aligned activities in previous financial year (2024) | Proportion of Taxonomy-aligned activities in previous financial year (2024) | |||||
Climate Change Mitigation | Climate Change Adaptation | Water | Circular Economy | Pollution | Biodiversity | ||||||||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | (14) | (15) | (16) |
KPI | mEUR | % | mEUR | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | mEUR | % |
Turnover | 323.1 | 0.0% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CapEx | 38.8 | 36.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OpEX | 0.7 | 0.0% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Table 5: EU Taxonomy summary table KPI's
CapEx 2025 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Economic Activities | Code | Proportion of Taxonomy-eligible CapEx | Taxonomy-aligned CapEx | Proportion of Taxonomy-aligned CapEx | Breakdown by environmental objectives of Taxonomy-aligned activities | Enabling activity | Transitional activity | Proportion of Taxonomy-aligned in Taxonomy-eligible | |||||
Climate Change Mitigation | Climate Change Adaptation | Water | Circular Economy | Pollution | Biodiverstiy | ||||||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | (14) |
Activity | % | mEUR | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | E (where applicable) | T (where applicable) | % | |
Acquisition and ownership of buildings | CCM 7.7 | 3.6% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
Transport by motorbikes, passenger cars and commercial vehicles | CCM 6.5 | 33.3% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
Sum of alignment per objective | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |||||||
Total CapEx | 36.9% | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
Table 6: EU Taxonomy activity breakdown
Apart from the impact climate change has on our organisation, we acknowledge that our organisation also contributes to CO2-emissions. By quantifying our emissions, we can identify and implement targeted reduction measures. Therefore, since 2022, we have been annually mapping our CO2-emissions using the CO2 Performance Ladder methodology. This approach distinguishes between different types of emissions, almost identical in accordance with the GHG Protocol classification.
Team EIFFEL does not measure CH4-, N2O-, HFCs-, PFCs-, SF6- and NF3-emissions, because these emissions are not material compared to the total CO2-emissions.
In 2022, Team EIFFEL set reduction targets for Scope 1 and Scope 2, as these are the areas where we have the most influence. Our main target is to reduce CO2 emissions by 23,7% per FTE by 2027 compared to 2022. For scope 1, we want to reduce 42%, and for scope 2, we want to reduce 8% (no specific targets for market and location-based emissions). Regarding Scope 3, the aim is to reduce CO2 emissions by 8% relative to FTE. When determining the values for our base year, we did not take into account external influences such as temperature anomalies. We also did not consider sectoral decarbonisation pathways, science-based target frameworks or have our targets assessed by a third party.
Team EIFFEL pursues a strong buy‑and‑build strategy, under which the Group aims to acquire at least one company annually. At the time of acquisition, comprehensive information on the CO₂ emissions, as well as the sustainability objectives and measures of the acquired entities, is not always available. Given the Group’s growth strategy and the limited availability of emissions data for newly acquired entities, CO₂ reduction targets are therefore formulated on a relative basis, expressed per FTE, rather than as absolute targets.
In the first half of 2026, Team EIFFEL will re-evaluate their base year. Based on this new base year, we will set new reduction targets for Scope 1, 2 and 3, spanning our relevant business operations in our upstream and downstream value chain. When determining these new reduction targets, the two scenarios from our scenario analysis (‘Net Zero 2050’ and ‘Current Policies’) will be taken into account. There are two main reasons for new reduction targets:
Team EIFFEL will follow the updated GHG-protocol, where the arrangement of scopes and categories has changed.
With the acquisition of Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries and the insights into their CO2 emissions in 2025, we now have a full picture of the CO2 emissions of Team EIFFEL. Therefore, we can set realistic, but nevertheless ambitious, reduction targets.
Team EIFFEL's current reduction targets are not aligned with or quantitatively support the 1.5°C pathway in line with the Paris Agreement and are not based on conclusive scientific evidence. However, we want to examine if our new reduction targets could comply with or come close to the Paris Agreement, as we are not excluded from the EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks. Also, part of the new reduction targets are annually pre-set interim benchmarks.
We currently have a transition plan in place, aimed at reducing our significant emissions and transitioning into more sustainable business practices, while aiming to neutralise our local climate impacts. The transition plan is designed to substantially reduce Team EIFFEL’s GHG emissions. Key elements of our transition plan, (1) reduction targets and (2) emission reduction measures, are approved by the Management Board. The transition plan and actions to reduce environmental impacts do not have any material impact on Team EIFFEL’s current workforce. The possible main effect is that a stronger focus on environmental responsibility may, over time, increase the attractiveness of Team EIFFEL to prospective employees who place greater value on sustainability.
In our CO2-footprint, see chapter ‘Results Team EIFFEL’, the specific upstream scope 3 value chain activities are mentioned. All scope 3 activities of Team EIFFEL are located in the Netherlands. Team EIFFEL does not take part in associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries, or contractual arrangements that are accountable for scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.
The policies to achieve our current reduction plan focus on one core area:
Climate mitigation
Improving energy efficiency and transitioning to a higher use of renewable energy sources for our operations and our clients.
Table 7 provides an overview of our emission reduction activities, divided into various decarbonisation levers. Our reduction activities focus on varying solutions, such as adjusting our vehicle fleet, buildings and behavioural changes.
Decarbonisation lever | Emission reduction activities from 2026 onwards | Expected emission reduction |
|---|---|---|
Transition of vehicle fleet | A significant portion of our emissions originates from our vehicle fleet. To address this, we are implementing a phased transition to electric vehicles while phasing out fossil-fuelled vehicles across our operations. All new lease vehicles will be electric. Travelling with public transport will be the standard for new employees. In addition, every employee can use a lease bicycle. To further support our transition to an electric fleet, the installation of more electric charging stations is underway, which is dependent on the wider energy transition of the Netherlands. | The expected emission reductions from these decarbonisation levers will be quantified when setting our new reduction targets in 2026. |
Buildings | Energy efficiency initiatives In the past, consolidating our smaller locations has had a positive environmental impact. It allows for more efficient resource use, centralised and sustainable procurement, and broader implementation of sustainable innovations. With the recent acquisitions of CLAFIS B.V. and Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries, Team EIFFEL has 20+ buildings in its portfolio. In 2026, Team EIFFEL wants to consolidate to 11 – 12 buildings. Team EIFFEL will examine the possibilities for purchasing Guarantees of Origin (GvO’s) for its scope 2 electricity emissions through buildings. Waste We also strive to minimise our environmental impact on the daily operations of our locations. At locations where we control catering, we aim to reduce packaging, use local products, and prevent food waste through just-in-time purchasing and careful planning, and we practice waste separation at all locations. | |
Behavioural and structural changes. | In 2026, Team EIFFEL, in cooperation with our mobility partner, will start with fuel-efficient driving training for (some) employees. There will be more focus on communication campaigns to raise awareness for fuel-efficient driving, carpooling, charging electric vehicles at our offices, our lease bicycle schemes and other initiatives. |
Table 7: Emission reduction activities
Climate targets are also being operationalised through policies and business decisions. For example, our mobility-focused decarbonisation levers focus on encouraging the use of electric vehicles and public transport; our facilities team is tasked with improving energy performance across all locations and consolidating buildings, and sustainability criteria are being embedded into supplier assessments and procurement processes. By combining these measures with efficient monitoring and periodic reviews, we are bound to make significant progress towards several decarbonisation objectives.
To monitor and manage progress, we have established a structured governance framework that enables regular data collection, internal reviews and external validation. Emission figures are tracked semi-annually and will be published with transparency and assurance in line with ESRS timelines. When Team EIFFEL acquires a new company, its CO2 emissions data will be included in the year of acquisition from the moment of control. If the impact is above threshold (5%), EIFFEL will include the data in the base year in the report the year after acquisition.
In line with the GHG Protocol, we have calculated our emissions across Scope 1 (direct emissions), Scope 2 (indirect emissions from purchased electricity), and Scope 3 (indirect value chain emissions where relevant). The reported data for 2025 is subject to change due to extrapolation. The extrapolation is based on actual emissions data collected for Q1, Q2, and Q3. The total emissions for these nine months were divided by nine to calculate an average monthly emission level, which was then multiplied by twelve to estimate total annual emissions. The underlying data is derived from primary sources, including our mobility partners and building lease partners.
This approach introduces a degree of uncertainty, as it does not fully account for potential seasonal variations or year-end adjustments. However, the effect of seasonal variety or year-end adjustments is estimated to be non-significant on the emissions of Team EIFFEL. This leads us to believe that our approach and estimations, given that they are based on directly reported partner data, are considered to be reasonably reliable. Minor adjustments may be made in next year’s report once complete annual data becomes available.
An exception applies to Wepro Group B.V. and subsidiaires’ emissions, which are based on full coverage for the year 2025, with no extrapolation applied. This is further explained in Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries’ dedicated section of this report.
Retrospective | Milestones and targets1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base year | 2023 | 2024 | 20252 | % 2025/2024 | 2030 | Annual % target/base year | |
Scope 1 GHG emissions | |||||||
Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions (tCO2eq) | 3,987.15 | 4,078.97 | 3,848.29 | 3,702.63 | -3.79% | TBD | TBD |
Scope 2 GHG emissions | |||||||
Gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2eq) | 1,570.15 | 1,328.86 | 1,472.51 | 1,102.68 | -25.12% | TBD | TBD |
Gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions (tCO2eq) | 1,326.52 | 1,289.16 | 1,690.89 | 457.95 | -72.92% | TBD | TBD |
Significant scope 3 GHG emissions3 | |||||||
Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (tCO2eq) | 11,607.36 | 7,758.01 | 12,204.07 | 11,959.29 | -2.01% | TBD | TBD |
1 Purchased goods and services | 9,577.02 | 5,844.48 | 10,119.78 | 9,399.59 | -7.12% | TBD | TBD |
2 Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in scope 1 or scope 2) | 1,390.33 | 1,392.20 | 1,464.29 | 1,220.91 | -16.62% | TBD | TBD |
3 Waste generated in operations | 15.78 | 27.55 | 54.56 | 41.54 | -23.86% | TBD | TBD |
4 Business traveling | 537.52 | 493.78 | 565.44 | 493.94 | -12.65% | TBD | TBD |
5 Employee commuting | 86.71 | - | - | 803.31 | +100% | TBD | TBD |
Total GHG emissions | |||||||
Total GHG emissions (location-based) (tCO2eq) | 17,164.66 | 13,165.84 | 17,524.87 | 16,764.61 | -4.34% | TBD | TBD |
Total GHG emissions (market-based) (tCO2eq) | 16,921.03 | 13,126.14 | 17,743.25 | 16,119.87 | -9.15% | TBD | TBD |
Table 8: Annual GHG emissions Team EIFFEL
Scope 1 emissions decline mainly due to fewer litres of petrol consumed. Due to the incorporation of CLAFIS B.V., the ratio of electric and fossil fuel cars has slightly changed. In 2024, the ratio of electric/fossil fuel was 44%-56%. In 2025, the ratio of electric/fossil fuel is 41%-59%.
Scope 2 location-based emissions decline because of lower total energy usage and a lower emission factor (2024 = 328, 2025 = 268). A significant driver of the decrease in Scope 2 market‑based emissions is the purchase of Guarantees of Origin (GoO) certificates.
GHG emissions intensity ratio - Team EIFFEL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
Scope 1 GHG emissions intensity ratio per employee | tCO2eq/FTE | 2.21 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.30 |
Total location-based GHG emissions intensity ratio per employee | tCO2eq/FTE | 9.51 | 5.07 | 6.27 | 5.88 |
Total market-based GHG emissions intensity ratio per employee1 | tCO2eq/FTE | 9.38 | 5.06 | 6.35 | 5.66 |
Total GHG emission intensity per net revenue (location-based)2 | tCO2eq/Revenue | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Total GHG emission intensity per net revenue (market-based)2 | tCO2eq/Revenue | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
Table 9: GHG emissions intensity Team EIFFEL
So far, progress has primarily been measured in relation to the number of employees (Table 9). Team EIFFEL considers this the most effective way to track its environmental impact, while keeping its growth ambitions in mind. This year, the GHG emission intensity per net revenue has been added to the table to fully comply with the ESRS.
We have already made measurable progress in reducing our Scope 2 emissions through the purchase of renewable electricity and energy efficiency improvements in our office spaces. For Scope 1 emissions, we are transitioning toward a low-emission vehicle fleet. Scope 3 emissions remain more complex, but we are in the process of expanding our value chain data coverage.
In 2025, 586.8 tons of CO2 came from key assets (buildings), so-called locked-in GHG emissions. This is 3.64% of the market-based emissions and 3.50% of the location-based emissions. These emissions will not jeopardise our GHG-emission reduction targets. As stated in Table 7, in 2026, Team EIFFEL wants to consolidate to 11 – 12 buildings. This will lead to a decrease in locked-in emissions.
Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries, as part of Team EIFFEL, play a role in achieving the group’s overall climate objectives. Operating primarily within engineering and project management for the physical living environment, Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries are directly engaged with sustainability challenges, from infrastructure and energy projects to future-proofing urban environments.
Table 10 below summarises the current emissions performance of Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries. Emissions are reported in line with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and follow the structure of Scope 1 (direct), Scope 2 (indirect from energy), and Scope 3 (indirect from value chain activities, where material). All figures are in metric tons of CO₂-equivalent. Despite the fact that Team EIFFEL took operational control of Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries in May 2025, we voluntarily report CO2-emissions for the whole of 2025, as an additional disclosure. Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries’ emissions are based on actual activity data collected for the full 2025 reporting year. As complete data was available, no estimation or extrapolation techniques were applied.
Retrospective | Milestones and targets | ||
|---|---|---|---|
2025 | 2030 | Annual % target/base year | |
Scope 1 GHG emissions | |||
Gross scope 1 emissions (tCO2eq) | 199.87 | TBD | TBD |
Scope 2 GHG emissions | |||
Gross location-based scope 2 emissions (tCO2eq) | 55.03 | TBD | TBD |
Gross market-based scope 2 emissions (tCO2eq) | 40.57 | TBD | TBD |
Significant scope 3 GHG emissions | |||
Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (tCO2eq) | 622.85 | TBD | TBD |
1 Purchased good and services | 285.07 | TBD | TBD |
2 Fuel and energy related activities | 68.95 | TBD | TBD |
3 Business traveling | 8.91 | TBD | TBD |
4 Commuting | 259.91 | TBD | TBD |
Total GHG emissions | |||
Total GHG emissions (location-based) (tCO2eq) | 877.74 | TBD | TBD |
Total GHG emissions (market-based) (tCO2eq) | 863.29 | TBD | TBD |
Table 10: Annual GHG emissions Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries
The CO₂ emissions calculations were conducted using the following methodology:
Data collection is done by Team EIFFEL's quality department. De Duurzame Adviseurs (DDA) translate the data into a CO2-footprint and ensure compliance with the CO₂ Performance Ladder.
Emission conversion factors were sourced from CO2-emissiefactoren.nl for Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 – business travel. For Scope 3 – waste, conversion factors from the CO₂ Performance Ladder were applied, while DEFRA data was used for Scope 3 – purchased goods and services.
Scope 2 emissions were split into location-based (Dutch electricity mix) and market-based (green electricity certified by Guarantee of Origin certificates) categories.
Team EIFFEL validates its footprint through a certification body. This validation results in a CO2 Performance Ladder certification. Currently, Team EIFFEL is at level 5, the highest level. CLAFIS has its own CO2 Performance Ladder certification at level 3. Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries do not have a CO2 Performance Ladder certification.
At Team EIFFEL, we recognise that reducing energy consumption and transitioning to renewable energy sources are essential to achieving our climate goals. Energy usage is a key driver of our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, and as such, we monitor it closely and aim to reduce both absolute consumption and the share of non-renewable energy within our operations.
As mentioned earlier, in the first half of 2026, Team EIFFEL will decide on a new base year. Subsequently, new reduction targets for Scope 1, 2 and 3 will be set, spanning our relevant business operations in our upstream and downstream value chain. In this process, Team EIFFEL will also set targets for energy reduction.
We measure energy use in megawatt-hours (MWh) and report separately on renewable and non-renewable sources. Our report covers electricity, heating, and fuels used for transport and operations.
Progress annual energy consumption Team EIFFEL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of energy carrier | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
Non-renewable sources | ||||
Total energy consumption from fossil sources | 19,323.51 | 19,789.03 | 19,355.92 | 16,339.45 |
Total energy consumption from nuclear sources | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Renewable sources | ||||
Fuel consumption from renewable sources | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources23 | 750.42 | 683.07 | 705.34 | 2,995.96 |
Consumption of self-generated non-fuel neweable energy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total energy consumption from renewable sources | 750.42 | 683.07 | 705.34 | 2,995.96 |
Table 11: Progress annual energy consumption Team EIFFEL
In recent years, we have taken concrete steps to improve our energy performance. These include switching to certified green electricity in most of our offices, promoting hybrid and electric company vehicles, and introducing stricter energy-use guidelines for leased spaces. We are also exploring opportunities to make our remaining heating sources more sustainable and to further reduce fuel consumption across our operations. Apart from the targets mentioned in this chapter, there are currently no other targets set focusing on environmentally related goals.
Just as with our emission data, Team EIFFEL voluntarily reports on the full 2025 data for Wepro’s energy usage as an additional disclosure. Energy is measured in megawatt-hours (MWh) and reported separately on renewable and non-renewable sources.
Type of energy carrier | 2025 |
|---|---|
Non-renewable sources | |
Total energy consumption from fossil sources | 918.35 |
Total energy consumption from nuclear sources | 0 |
Renewable sources | |
Fuel consumption from renewable sources | 0 |
Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources | 107.32 |
Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy | 0 |
Total energy consumption from renewable sources | 107.32 |
Table 12: Energy consumption Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries
FTE (Full-Time Equivalent): FTE outflow / average FTE employed. Expressed over a period of 12 months.
Gross Scope 1 emissions: Direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from owned or controlled sources, such as company facilities (e.g. natural gas use) and company vehicles (e.g. fuel consumption of lease vehicles).
Gross location-based Scope 2 emissions: Indirect GHG emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling consumed by the company, calculated using average emission factors for the regional electricity grid (e.g. Dutch grid).
Gross market-based Scope 2 emissions: Indirect GHG emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating, and cooling, calculated using supplier-specific emission factors or certificates (e.g. GoO – Guarantees of Origin for green electricity).
Scope 3 emissions: All other indirect emissions that occur in the value chain of the company, both upstream and downstream. The following activities have been identified:
Business travel: Number of kilometres travelled for business trips.
Fuel- and energy-related activities: Fuel consumption that occurs indirectly as a result of business activities, but not within Scope 1 or 2 (such as WTT – well-to-tank).
Waste generated in operations: Weight of various types of waste streams from production or business operations.
Purchased goods and services: Expenses related to goods and services acquired by the company, such as employment services, catering, facility services, legal services, financial and professional services (e.g. PR, consultancy, training, telecommunications, leasing).
In each section, a variety of key data points will be highlighted, encompassing all labels. Any deviations from this approach will be explicitly noted. Where targets have been established, these are disclosed accordingly. For targets that are not yet disclosed in this reporting period, this reflects the ongoing process of further maturing the target-setting framework within Team EIFFEL.
Team EIFFEL's organisational structure consists of a broad network of business lines with close-knit business units designed to foster collaboration. Activities are organised into distinct business lines, enabling sector-specific focus and the prioritisation of key issues. This approach strengthens interpersonal connections for employees and enables the delivery of innovation and excellence to clients.
This collaborative structure also underpins efforts to enhance employee engagement, ensuring that organisational cohesion is complemented by individual well-being. This engagement is continuously monitored and further developed through our feedback survey called “Hey WhatsUp”. This allows all employees to regularly share their experiences and sense of belonging. These insights serve as an underlying indicator within a broader organisational metric. While engagement insights from the survey provide a broad view, the diversity of individual experiences is recognised, ensuring a balanced approach between team dynamics and personal needs.
Team EIFFEL operates with a structure that includes various types of contractual arrangements, such as permanent, temporary, and project-based agreements, depending on what is suitable in each situation. The structure is designed to support stability, flexibility, and clarity regarding career development and working conditions. Within this framework, salaries, allowances, and other employment conditions are aligned with statutory minimum requirements, including the obligation for all employees to receive at least the legal minimum wage. As of the reporting date, the lowest gross monthly salary amounts to €2.495,95, which is set above the applicable statutory minimum wage. In addition, remuneration levels are generally set to remain competitive within the market, which may support the attraction and retention of talent. These developments are linked to the planned implementation of salary structures aligned with role descriptions, in accordance with the EU Pay Transparency Directive, expected to begin in 2027. This process aims to initiate compliance with the obligations under the EU Pay Transparency Directive. While the exact approach regarding the job classification framework is still being defined, the plan focuses on creating a transparent and fair remuneration structure aligned with regulatory requirements. These contractual arrangements support employees’ development and engagement, contributing to team continuity and reducing unwanted turnover.
To prevent any violation of labour laws, Team EIFFEL upholds the principle of fair labour practices in line with Dutch legislation, ensuring full compliance with regulations governing working hours, employment security, leave entitlements, sickness, and pension contributions.
Building on this focus on remuneration structure and transparency, Team EIFFEL also investigates the unadjusted gender pay gap as part of its broader workforce insights. The unadjusted gender pay gap reflects the difference in median remuneration between women and men without accounting for organisational factors such as role requirements, seniority distribution or working‑time arrangements.
Unadjusted gender pay gap (31 december 2025) | |
|---|---|
Male-female | 6.9% |
Table 13: Unadjusted gender pay gap
The remuneration ratio reflects the relationship between the total annual remuneration of the highest-paid executive and the median annual remuneration of all employees. It is disclosed in line with applicable reporting requirements to ensure transparency on internal pay levels.
Remuneration ratio (31 december 2025) | |
|---|---|
Ratio | 9.4 |
Table 14: Remuneration ratio
At Team EIFFEL, the safety and well-being of employees is a key focus. The organisation identifies employees, working contexts, and activities that may involve a higher likelihood of harm, and applies measures to address these risks. These measures include the Risk Inventory and Evaluation (RI&E), assessments of psychosocial workload, the Occupational Accident Prevention Policy, and the Safety Culture Ladder (EIFFEL Projects and CLAFIS). They are applied to limit disproportionate exposure to hazards and ensure that all employees face comparable levels of risk. By implementing these measures, the organisation works to maintain a safe working environment and uphold the reputation of Team EIFFEL.
In addition, the health and safety metrics for this year are not included, as these disclosures are subject to the phased‑in requirements that apply in this first reporting year.
For the current reporting year, data is sourced from multiple systems, such as Nmbrs and AFAS, used across the various entities operating under Team EIFFEL. All entities are included in the data collection process, and the full employee population falls within the scope of this report. To ensure completeness and accuracy, all data were extracted at the end of the reporting period, thereby capturing all relevant information for the 2025 reporting year. Any deviations from this methodology are disclosed in the relevant table.
The resulting raw dataset is subsequently subjected to a series of filters to derive the specific data points presented in this report. The various terms and definitions used in the tables are explained at the end of the chapter in the definitions section, providing the necessary context for interpreting the tables and the results presented below. To comply with the ESRS, two tables have been merged in comparison with the last reporting year.
Headcount by gender, employment classification and contract type | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | Male | Other | Unknown | Total | |
Number of employees | 1,231 | 2,008 | 3 | 7 | 3,249 |
Number of permanent employees | 1,017 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 2,657 |
Number of temporary employees | 210 | 366 | 3 | 5 | 584 |
Number of unknown employees2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Number of non-guaranteed hours | 14 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 36 |
Number of full-time employees | 446 | 1,141 | 2 | 7 | 1,596 |
Number of part-time employees | 771 | 846 | 0 | 0 | 1,617 |
Number of employees with an unknown contracttype2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 15: Headcount by gender, employment classification and contract type
Employee turnover is determined on the basis of employment contracts that were terminated during the reporting year. All contracts that ended between 1 January 2025 and 31 December 2025 are classified as employee departures and are registered as such within our HR systems. Turnover is measured in terms of headcount, ensuring consistency with the broader workforce metrics applied throughout this sustainability statement.
For the calculation of the turnover ratio, we assess headcount outflow in relation to the average headcount expressed over the full twelve-month period. This approach provides a balanced view of annual workforce dynamics and allows for a consistent comparison across reporting periods.
The total outflow amounts to 1,347 employees (41.6%). This turnover appears to be influenced by the general mobility within the professional services sector and the project‑based nature of several roles, which may lead to periodic fluctuations. Most employees hold open‑ended contracts, while fixed‑term contracts are typically used for project‑related needs or temporary capacity. The balance between full‑time and part‑time roles reflects both role requirements and employee preferences for working time arrangements.
Employee turnover1 | |
|---|---|
Number | Percentage |
1,347 | 41.6% |
Table 16: Employee turnover in headcount
As at 31 December 2025, Team EIFFEL engaged 168 non-employees within its own workforce, reported in headcount. These non-employees consist of self-employed professionals and individuals contracted through intermediary undertakings (brokers).
The use of non-employees is aligned with the project-based nature of the organisation, which requires flexible deployment of expertise depending on client assignments. The number of non-employees may therefore vary in line with project demand and assignment duration.
Non-employee headcount (December 2025)1 | |
|---|---|
Non-employee headcount | 168 |
Table 17: Non-employee classification in headcount
The continuous enhancement of employees’ knowledge and professional competencies is regarded as a fundamental organisational responsibility, while employees are likewise expected to take an active role in managing their own development. Efforts focus on cultivating a lifelong learning-oriented culture and promoting collective development within the various professional communities. Investments in career and skills development strengthen the overall workforce, while simultaneously contributing to the organisation's profile as an attractive employer and dependable business partner. In addition to these learning and development efforts, the organisation also considers potential changes in its environmental practices and their possible effects on employees.
In light of these changing skill requirements, the organisation focuses on ensuring that employees remain equipped to meet evolving market expectations. Career development and skill enhancement are therefore viewed as essential elements for both individual progression and long-term employability. As part of the annual performance cycle, all employees participate in a performance assessment, which provides a structured review of progress and future development needs. For non-employees who typically work with Team EIFFEL on a project basis, performance is evaluated through a continuous performance cycle. Because their assignments are assessed on an ongoing basis, underperformance may lead to early termination of the project.
Team EIFFEL deploys professionals on secondment to (local) governments and private sectors, where full compliance with legislation and mandatory training is essential, as any oversight could pose significant risks, e.g. losing sales through misalignment with industry standards, losing our talent and reducing organisational growth. To mitigate these risks, the organisation has implemented measures for the employees, such as learning tracks, which are structured paths of lessons, activities, or modules designed to help someone learn a topic step-by-step. These learning tracks are updated as needed, guided by changes, feedback, and evolving requirements. Content owners remain responsible for maintaining their materials, ensuring updates are made when relevant.
These learning tracks are available through the central learning hub, the Team EIFFEL Academy. This platform is designed to inspire, track, and connect talent while enabling employees to take ownership of their professional development. It offers a broad range of learning formats, including classroom training, on-demand digital modules, and resources, supported by strong collaborations that further enhance capability and competitiveness and reinforce this integrated approach. Together, these efforts are intended to support the provision of structured and compliant learning opportunities across the organisation, helping to address the risk that rapid market changes could make training less relevant over time.
We are exploring how people and business data, supported by advanced technology and artificial intelligence, can provide better insight into future skill needs and development opportunities. In 2026, we will build on this exploratory phase by translating these insights into targeted initiatives that strengthen proactive workforce development, long-term employability and our ability to attract new talent. For the business, this approach helps us manage our talent pipeline more effectively and respond to client needs with greater agility. With continuous insight into market developments and our organisation’s capabilities, we remain well prepared for emerging challenges and continue building a future-ready organisation where talent can grow with purpose.
At last, the learning and development metrics for this year are not included, as these disclosures are subject to the phased‑in requirements that apply in this first reporting year.
At Team EIFFEL, we understand how important it is to support the well-being of our employees. We believe in promoting a healthy work-life balance and are taking steps to protect physical, mental, and emotional health.
Maintaining a good balance between work and personal life, along with strong physical and mental health, is essential for a resilient and productive workforce. Team EIFFEL has introduced several initiatives aimed at improving employee well-being. These efforts can help our employees gain insights into mental well-being and help boost productivity, improve retention, enhance overall performance, and increase employee engagement and performance.
Offering flexible working hours is one of these initiatives. We also aim to strike a healthy balance between working at the office, at client sites, and from home. All employees are welcome to consult with the company doctor during designated hours, regardless of their current health status. These consultations are designed to prevent health issues or detect them early. In addition, we offer our employees the option to take periodic occupational health examinations (POHE).
Team EIFFEL has conducted psychosocial workload assessments to identify stress factors and determine where improvements are needed. In line with strengthening resilience and fostering a high-performance mindset, the organisation collaborates with a topsport community, reflecting its ambition to embed a culture of sustained excellence.
To further support employee well-being, a range of resources is provided, including webinars, internal development coaching, and dedicated prevention employees who focus on health, safety, and mental well‑being.
Another way we check in on our employees is via our earlier mentioned engagement survey “Hey WhatsUp”, which we implemented this year. It checks in with our employees at random and at specific milestones, for example, after finishing a project by sending short questions or statements through push notifications. The feedback is collected anonymously. Several times a year, the Board publishes “boardblogs” to enhance communication and transparency within Team EIFFEL, directly reflecting concerns and suggestions raised through Hey WhatsUp. The response rates and the key topics raised are regularly analysed as well as shared with the employees of Team EIFFEL. This helps raise awareness of the existence of Hey Whatsup and reinforces the message that survey outcomes are taken seriously and acted upon. In addition, Team EIFFEL reflects on the survey results to monitor employee satisfaction and support employee well‑being. The base year used for this analysis is 2025. Employees are also given the opportunity to share suggestions for improvement or raise concerns regarding initiatives such as Hey Whatsup or others, either through a formal improvement suggestion form managed by the Quality Team or directly via their line manager.
Through these initiatives, Team EIFFEL aims to promote employee satisfaction and sustain a strong level of employee retention. With regard to all initiatives that are mentioned in the text above, the organisation as a whole is eager to improve. Workforce‑related initiatives are discussed with the Management Team and the business line directors, after which decisions are made regarding the allocation of time and financial resources. The level of resources allocated depends on the scope and nature of the initiative. Apart from the targets and initiatives explicitly described in this chapter, no additional formal workforce-related targets have been defined.
We want our people to feel empowered to act and protect their mental health. In the unfortunate event that someone does experience a decline in mental or physical health, we have measures in place to support recovery. For example, we comply with the “Wet Verbetering Poortwachter” and work closely with the company doctor to support reintegration. Our goal is to reduce long-term absenteeism due to health issues.
Next to mental health, physical health is equally important to Team EIFFEL. We aim to keep all our employees physically healthy. There are several ways we stimulate this, for instance, through our Team EIFFEL company field hockey team. Furthermore, we host so-called vitality challenges a few times a year. Here, our employees can try out new sports under the guidance of professionals. An example is the running clinic provided this year by an ex-triathlete.
In line with our personal and collective agreements, and as part of our commitment to wellbeing, Team EIFFEL provides comprehensive social protection to safeguard employees against income loss resulting from illness, injury, unemployment, or disability. This includes statutory forms of leave such as parental, adoption, maternity, birth, parenting, and care leave, as governed by the Work and Care Act, to which all employees (100%) are entitled. In the event of illness, employees receive at least 70% continued salary payment for the first 104 weeks, with exact percentages varying by label but never falling below this minimum standard.
Utilised family-related leave in %1 | |
|---|---|
Male | 8.6% |
Female | 10.2% |
Total | 9.2% |
Table 18: Work-life balance
Family‑related leave is measured as the percentage of employees who have recorded child‑ or care‑related leave hours in our HR systems during the reporting year. This indicator reflects how many employees make use of these arrangements, based on registered leave entries. This indicator is based on the average headcount.
Team EIFFEL places immense importance on respecting fundamental human rights. These rights are recognised within the organisation as universal values that guide both company policy and daily operations. In addition to the formal recognition of human rights as foundational principles, these rights are also integral to the way Team EIFFEL engages with its employees and reinforces human dignity. This is reflected in the CoC currently in place for some labels. These rights include protection of all employees working for that label, for example against discrimination based on gender, national origin, race, colour, age, marital status, religion, sexual orientation, and disability, as well as intimidation, abuse of authority, violence, aggression, substance abuse, and any other similar behaviours, in accordance with European and national legislation.
While an existing CoC covering a few labels already addresses many relevant aspects, Team EIFFEL is working towards a single, unified CoC that applies across the entire organisation. The aim is to finalise and widely publish this consolidated CoC in the first half of 2026.
In shaping policies and internal processes, Team EIFFEL adheres to internationally recognised frameworks, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Declaration and the OECD Guidelines. These principles form the foundation for a safe, fair, and respectful working environment and align with the organisation’s broader commitment to ethical and sustainable business practices, including fair labour standards, environmental stewardship, and active community engagement. To safeguard these principles, several training programs have been developed that address important topics from the CoC that is currently under development, such as creating a secure working environment. By embedding these standards and training initiatives, Team EIFFEL fosters integrity and leverages employee differentiation to unlock individual potential and strengthen organisational capability. This approach also reduces the risk of reputational harm, ensuring lasting trust among stakeholders.
To complement these principles and training initiatives, Team EIFFEL has established formal mechanisms that allow employees to report and address incidents of undesirable behaviour or potential human rights violations. These mechanisms include a complaints procedure, through which each report is registered, assigned, analysed, resolved, and formally closed, ensuring a consistent and thorough handling process. In addition, a whistleblower policy allows employees to report serious misconduct, including human rights violations, confidentially and is publicly accessible through the designated document. Together, these measures translate the organisation’s commitments into practical protections for employees and support the consistent application of ethical standards across the workforce.
During the reporting period, Team EIFFEL received 18 reports through confidential channels, covering a range of workplace concerns. These included 10 matters related to leadership approach, one matter of interpersonal conduct, and a small number of sensitive issues. All cases were addressed with care and in accordance with established procedures. One case resulted in a formal complaint, with ongoing dialogue maintained between the parties involved. A few reports were primarily supportive in nature, aimed at providing guidance and a listening ear. The organisation continues to monitor these themes closely to foster a respectful and inclusive work environment. No cases of discrimination or harassment were reported through the National Contact Point for OECD national enterprises, and thus no fines, penalties, or compensation were paid in relation to such matters.These findings are based on internal HR and compliance records, compiled in accordance with applicable privacy regulations.
Broker: Headcount of non-employees working for Team EIFFEL through a broker
Compensation: A sum of money awarded to victims of discrimination to compensate for the losses they have suffered as a result of the harmful effects.
Complaints: Expressions of dissatisfaction or concern about a specific problem or situation that requires attention or a solution through a predetermined complaints process.
Discrimination: The unequal treatment of persons based on certain characteristics; based on religion, belief, political opinion, race, gender, homosexual orientation, marital status, social position, or on any other ground.
Employee Categories: Different groups or types of employees within an organisation or in the labour market, categorised based on specific characteristics or criteria.
Employees: People with an employment contract with the organisation who receive a salary or bonus payment for their work, such as permanent and temporary employees, part-time employees, flexible employees (zero-hour contract), paid interns, BBL employees/work students (paid) and self-employed professionals.
Employment: A formal agreement between a worker and an employer, where the worker commits to perform work in exchange for compensation, usually in the form of a salary.
Family-related leave: Maternity leave, birth leave, parental leave, carers' leave.
Fines: Fines imposed by regulatory authorities or courts for violations of anti-discrimination laws, aimed at preventing future offences.
Full-time: Work structure in which the employee works a fixed number of hours per week, i.e., 40 hours.
Function: Specific role or position within an organisation, in which an individual is responsible for certain tasks, activities, and outcomes. This role is typically associated with a description that includes the required knowledge, skills, responsibilities, and authorities, and contributes to the overarching objectives of the organisation.
Health and safety management system: Structured approaches that help organisations ensure the health and safety of their employees and minimise risks.
Incidents: An unplanned event or situation that negatively impacts the environment, society, or the economic sustainability of the company. This includes, but is not limited to, environmental damage, compliance issues with laws and regulations, supply chain disruptions leading to negative social consequences, or other unforeseen circumstances that jeopardise the company's ability to operate sustainably.
Non-employees: self-employed workers, people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in 'employment activities' (NACE Code N78).
Non-guaranteed hours: Headcount of employees with a 0-hour contract.
Other: Non-binary, genderqueer, or other gender identities that fall outside of male/female.
Own workforce: Employees and Non-employees
Part-time: A work structure in which the employee works fewer hours per week than a full-time employee, i.e., less than 40 hours per week.
Pay gap: The difference in median gross remuneration between two groups of employees.
Penalties: Sanctions, which include punitive measures, are imposed to address discriminatory practices and ensure compliance with legal standards.
Performance and career development reviews: Structured evaluations that organisations use to assess employee performance and support their career development.
Permanent contract: Headcount of employees with a contract for an indefinite period
Professionals: Type 'D' contracts
Self-employed: Headcount of non-employees working for Team EIFFEL through self-employment
Social protection: All measures that provide access to health care and income support in cases of challenging life events such as the loss of a job, being sick and in need of medical care, giving birth and raising a child or retiring and in need of a pension.
Temporary contract: Headcount of employees with a contract for a finite period (usually after one year)
Turnover rate: FTE outflow/average FTE employed. Expressed over a period of 12 months.
Unknown: The classification of data is unknown.
Work-related casualties: Events at work or during working hours that directly lead to health damage or death.
Work-related ill health: Health problems or illnesses that are a direct result of the work environment, activities, or stress factors related to an individual's profession.
Work-related injuries: Physical injury or medical conditions that an employee sustains while performing tasks related to their job or during work-related activities.
According to our vision, continuous development is essential to maintaining our clients’ trust. We recognise, however, that this does not occur automatically. To support this ambition, we have implemented safeguards to uphold the desired standards and organisational culture. Team EIFFEL secures its key processes through its internal audit team and team quality, supported by clearly defined policies and procedures that give substance to the internal controls required to safeguard the organisation. Where targets have been established, these are disclosed accordingly. For targets that are not yet disclosed in this reporting period, this reflects the ongoing process of further maturing the target-setting framework within Team EIFFEL.
We have developed, adopted, and disseminated policies that aim to promote a culture of responsible business conduct throughout our organisation. The CoC will form the core of our corporate culture, prescribing compliance with applicable law and outlining the ethical standards and values we uphold. As the organisation progresses toward a unified CoC for all labels, current policies still vary across parts of the organisation, reflecting the transitional nature of our policy framework following recent acquisitions.
Like the existing behavioural policies, the CoC is intended to guide conduct across our organisation and support the behaviours expected when carrying out business activities. The CoC will focus on human rights, common values, use of company inventory, side activities, bribery and corruption, and anticonflict of interest. The behavioural policies are available and communicated to our employees through AFAS, SharePoint and as part of their onboarding program, with the goal of positioning ourselves as trusted advisors on integrity and governance. Non-compliance with these policies may expose the organisation to serious risks, such as failing to meet tender requirements or client CoC.
Onboarding is organised at label level, providing new employees with the essential information they need. This involves providing a learning line through our Team EIFFEL Academy, offering separate learning tracks on important subjects and key aspects of the (future) CoC, such as a safe and secure working environment, privacy and data protection. In addition, we provide courses on compliance regulations and on the use of AI. Existing employees are updated through an internal communication channel (the Team EIFFEL app) in case amendments are made to the CoC.
Roles that carry a heightened exposure to integrity and compliance risks have been identified as the Management Board and employees at the partner, director, business management, and tender management levels. In 2025, an awareness compliance training on Market Abuse Regulation and business conduct was started for both the Management Board and the Supervisory Board. In 2026, it will be reviewed whether further training is needed, also considering the introduction of the CoC and any new requirements that may arise. The Management Board and the Central Works Council are both involved in the preparation and approval of the CoC. The board brings expertise in governance, compliance, and integrity management, ensuring the code aligns with laws and strategic values. The works council contributes practical insight into workplace behaviour and employee relations. Together, they combine legal, ethical, and organisational experience relevant to business conduct.
The Code of Conduct becomes applicable upon acceptance as part of the employment agreement process. The application of the Code of Conduct is monitored on the basis of the same reports submitted to the confidential advisors as described in the Fundamental Human Rights paragraph. These reports concern potential breaches and signals related to fundamental rights and the Code of Conduct. Each report is assessed and, where appropriate, followed up internally.
Based on the notifications we receive from the confidential advisors, compliance with the Code of Conduct is monitored systematically. If trends or repeated issues are identified, appropriate corrective and preventive actions are undertaken, such as targeted training.
# | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
ESRS 2: General Disclosures | ||
BP-1 | General basis for preparation of sustainability statements | Sustainability Statement: Basis for preparation |
BP-2 | Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | Sustainability Statement: Basis for preparation |
GOV-1 | The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | Sustainability Statement: The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
GOV-2 | Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies | Sustainability Statement: The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies |
GOV-3 | Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes | Sustainability Statement: Remuneration |
GOV-4 | Statement on due diligence | Sustainability Statement: Statement on Due Diligence |
GOV-5 | Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting | Sustainability Statement: The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies; Risk management and internal controls |
SBM-1 | Strategy, business model and value chain | Sustainability Statement: Strategy; Value creation model overview; Value chain overview |
SBM-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | Sustainability Statement: Interests and views of stakeholders; Stakeholder interests and sustainability views; Influence of stakeholder views on strategy and planned improvements to engagement; Communication of stakeholder views to governance bodies |
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | Sustainability Statement: Business Model overview; Material topics and IROs |
IRO-1 | Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities | Sustainability Statement: Basis for preparation, Double Materiality Assessment 2025 |
IRO-2 | Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement | Sustainability Statement: Double Materiality Assessment 2025 |
MDR-P | Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters | Sustainability Statement: Basis for preparation; Stakeholder interests and sustainability views; Double Materiality Assessment 2025 |
MDR-M | Metrics in relation to material sustainability matters | Sustainability Statement: Basis for preparation |
MDR-T | Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets | Sustainability Statement: Stakeholder interests and sustainability views |
# | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
ESRS E1: Climate Change | ||
E1-1 | Transition plan for climate change mitigation | Sustainability Statement: Climate Mitigation; Decarbonisation strategy; Progress |
E1-2 | Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | Sustainability Statement: Climate Mitigation; Decarbonisation strategy |
E1-3 | Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies | Sustainability Statement: Decarbonisation strategy |
E1-4 | Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation | Sustainability Statement: Our Climate Strategy; Climate scenario analysis; Climate Mitigation; Decarbonisation strategy; Results Team EIFFEL |
E1-5 | Energy consumption and mix | Sustainability Statement: Energy |
E1-6 | Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions | Sustainability Statement: Climate Mitigation; Decarbonisation strategy; Emissions baseline, Results Team EIFFEL; Results Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries; Method of CO2-emissions calculation |
E1.IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities | Sustainability Statement: Climate scenario analysis |
E1.SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business mode | Sustainability Statement: Climate scenario analysis; Climate Mitigation |
BP-2 | Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances | Sustainability Statement: Emissions baseline |
# | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
ESRS S1: Own Workforce | ||
SMB-2 | Interests and views of stakeholders | Sustainability Statement: Employment Conditions |
SBM-3 | Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model | Sustainability Statement: Employment Conditions; Health and safety; Results 2025; Learning and Development; Work-life Balance; Caring for our workforce; Fundamental Human Rights |
S1-1 | Policies related to own workforce | Sustainability Statement: Employment Conditions; Gender pay gap and remuneration ratio; Health and safety; Learning and Development; Caring for our workforce; Fundamental Human Rights |
S1-4 | Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to managing material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions | Sustainability Statement: Employment Conditions; Health and safety; Learning and Development; Caring for our workforce; Fundamental Human Rights |
S1-6 | Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees | Sustainability Statement: Results 2025 |
S1-7 | Characteristics of non-employees in the undertaking's own workforce | Sustainability Statement: Results 2025 |
S1-10 | Adequate wages | Sustainability Statement: Employment Conditions |
S1-11 | Social protection | Sustainability Statement: Employment Conditions; Caring for our workforce |
S1-13 | Training and skills development metrics | Sustainability Statement: Learning and Development |
S1-15 | Work-life balance metrics | Sustainability Statement: Caring for our workforce |
S1-16 | Remuneration metrics (pay gap and total remuneration) | Sustainability Statement: Gender pay gap and remuneration ratio |
S1-17 | Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts | Sustainability Statement: Fundamental Human Rights |
# | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
ESRS G1: Corporate Culture | ||
GOV-1 | The role of administrative, supervisory and management bodies | Sustainability Statement: Corporate culture & Code of Conduct |
IRO-1 | Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts | Sustainability Statement: Corporate culture |
G1-1 | Business conduct policies and corporate culture | Sustainability Statement: Corporate Culture; Corporate culture & code of conduct |
Disclosure requirement | Par. | Description | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU Climate Law reference | Material: Yes/No | Section in Sustainability Statements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESRS 2 GOV-1 | 21 (d) | Board's gender diversity | x | x | Mandatory | The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | ||
ESRS 2 GOV-2 | 21 (e) | Percentage of board members who are independent | x | Mandatory | The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies | |||
ESRS 2 GOV-4 | 30 | Statement on due dilligence | x | Mandatory | Statement on due dilligence | |||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 (d) i | Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel activities | x | x | x | Mandatory | N/A, this is not part of Team EIFFEL's business activities | |
ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 (d) ii | Involvement in activities related to chemical production | x | x | Mandatory | N/A, this is not part of Team EIFFEL's business activities | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 (d) iii | Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons | x | x | Mandatory | N/A, this is not part of Team EIFFEL's business activities | ||
ESRS 2 SBM-1 | 40 (d) iv | Involvement in activities related to cultivation and production of tobacco | x | Mandatory | N/A, this is not part of Team EIFFEL's business activities | |||
ESRS E1-1 | 14 | Transition plan to reach climate neutrality by 2050 | x | Yes | N/A, Team EIFFEL currently does not have a transition plan leading to climate neutrality by 2050 | |||
ESRS E1-1 | 16 (g) | Undertakings excluded from Paris-aligned Benchmarks | x | x | Yes | N/A, Team EIFFEL does not have undertakings excluded from Paris-aligned Benchmarks | ||
ESRS E1-4 | 34 | GHG emission reduction targets | x | x | x | Yes | Climate Mitigation | |
ESRS E1-5 | 37 | Energy consumption from fossil sources disaggregated by sources (only high climate impact sectors) | x | Yes | N/A, Team EIFFEL has no activities related to high climate impact sectors | |||
ESRS E1-5 | 38 | Energy consumption and mix | x | Yes | Energy ; Energy results Wepro | |||
ESRS E1-5 | 40 to 43 | Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors | x | Yes | N/A, Team EIFFEL has no activities related to high climate impact sectors | |||
ESRS E1-6 | 44 | Gross Scope 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions | x | x | x | Yes | Results Team EIFFEL ; Results Wepro | |
ESRS E1-6 | 53 to 55 | GHG intensity based on net revenue | x | x | x | Yes | Progress | |
ESRS E1-7 | 56 | GHG removals and carbon credits | x | Yes | N/A, this is not part of Team EIFFEL's business activities | |||
ESRS E1-9 | 66 | Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to climate-related physical risks | x | Yes | N/A, phase-in allowance applied | |||
ESRS E1-9 | 66 (a) | Disaggregation of monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk | x | Yes | N/A, phase-in allowance applied | |||
ESRS E1-9 | 66 (c) | Location of significant assets at material physical risk | Yes | N/A, phase-in allowance applied | ||||
ESRS E1-9 | 67 (c) | Breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets by energy-efficiency classes | x | Yes | N/A, phase-in allowance applied | |||
ESRS E1-9 | 69 | Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate- related opportunities | x | Yes | N/A, phase-in allowance applied |
Disclosure requirement | Par. | Description | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU Climate Law reference | Material: Yes/No | Section in Sustainability Statements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESRS E2-4 | 28 | Amount of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the E-PRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register) emitted to air, water and soil | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E3-1 | 9 | Policies related to water and marine resources | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E3-1 | 13 | Dedicated policy | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E3-1 | 14 | Policies related to sustainable oceans and seas | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E3-4 | 28 (c) | Total water recycled and reused | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E3-4 | 29 | Total water consumption in m 3 per net revenue on own operations | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS 2-IRO 1-E4 | 16 (a) 1 | Activities negatively affecting biodiversity sensitive areas | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS 2-IRO 1-E4 | 16 (b) | Material negative impacts with regards to land degradation, desertification or soil sealing | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS 2-IRO 1-E4 | 16 (c) | Operations that affect threatened species | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E4-2 | 24 (b) | Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E4-2 | 24 © | Sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E4-2 | 24 (d) | Policies to address deforestation | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E5-5 | 37 (d) | Non-recycled waste | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS E5-5 | 39 | Hazardous waste and radioactive waste | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS 2-SBM3-S1 | 14 (f) | Risk of incidents of forced labour | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS 2-SBM3-S1 | 14 (g) | Risk of incidents of child labour | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S1-1 | 20 | Human rights policy commitments | x | Yes | Fundamental Human Rights | |||
ESRS S1-1 | 21 | Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8 | x | Yes | Fundamental Human Rights | |||
ESRS S1-1 | 22 | Processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings paragraph 22 | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S1-1 | 23 | Workplace accident prevention policy or management system | x | Yes | Health and Safety | |||
ESRS S1-3 | 32 (c) | Grievance/complaints handling mechanisms | x | No | N/A |
Disclosure requirement | Par. | Description | SFDR reference | Pillar 3 reference | Benchmark regulation reference | EU Climate Law reference | Material: Yes/No | Section in Sustainability Statements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESRS S1-14 | 88 (b) and (c) | Number of fatalities and number and rate of work-related accidents | x | x | Yes | N/A, phase-in allowance applied | ||
ESRS S1-14 | 88 (e) | Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness | x | Yes | N/A, phase-in allowance applied | |||
ESRS S1-16 | 97 (a) | Unadjusted gender pay gap | x | x | Yes | Gender Pay gap and remuneration ratio | ||
ESRS S1-16 | 97 (b) | Annual total remuneration ratio | x | Yes | Gender Pay gap and remuneration ratio | |||
ESRS S1-17 | 103 (a) | Incidents of discrimination | x | Yes | Fundamental Human Rights | |||
ESRS S1-17 | 104 (a) | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD | x | x | Yes | Fundamental Human Rights | ||
ESRS 2-SBM3-S2 | 11 (b) | Significant risk of child labour or forced labour in the value chain | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S2-1 | 17 | Human rights policy commitments | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S2-1 | 18 | Policies related to value chain workers | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S2-1 | 19 | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights principles and OECD guidelines | x | x | No | N/A | ||
ESRS S2-1 | 19 | Due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labor Organisation Conventions 1 to 8 | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S2-4 | 36 | Human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S3-1 | 16 | Human rights policy commitments | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S3-1 | 17 | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights, ILO principles or OECD guidelines | x | x | No | N/A | ||
ESRS S3-4 | 36 | Human rights issues and incidents | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S4-1 | 16 | Policies related to consumers and end-users | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS S4-1 | 17 | Non-respect of UNGPs on Business and Human Rights and OECD guidelines | x | x | No | N/A | ||
ESRS S4-4 | 35 | Human rights issues and incidents | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS G1-1 | 10 (b) | United Nations Convention against Corruption | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS G1-1 | 10 (d) | Protection of whistle- blowers | x | No | N/A | |||
ESRS G1-4 | 24 (a) | Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws | x | x | No | N/A | ||
ESRS G1-4 | 24 (b) | Standards of anti- corruption and anti- bribery | x | No | N/A |
in € thousands | Notes | 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | |||||
Cost of sales | |||||
Gross profit | |||||
Selling expenses | |||||
General expenses | |||||
Operating profit | ( | ( | |||
Finance costs | |||||
Result before taxes | ( | ( | |||
Income tax expense | ( | ( | |||
Net result for the year | ( | ( | |||
Attributable to: | |||||
Shareholders of the company | ( | ( | |||
Minority shareholders | |||||
Net result for the year | ( | ( | |||
in € thousands | Notes | 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net result for the year | ( | ( | |||
Items not to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent period | |||||
Total comprehensive income for the year | ( | ( | |||
Total comprehensive income for the year attributable to: | |||||
Shareholders of the company | ( | ( | |||
Total comprehensive income for the year | ( | ( | |||
in € thousands | Notes | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
Non-current assets | |||
Intangible fixed assets | |||
Tangible fixed assets | |||
Financial fixed assets | |||
Total non-current assets | |||
Current assets | |||
Trade receivables and other current assets | |||
Contract assets | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | |||
Total current assets | |||
Total assets | |||
Equity | |||
Issued capital | |||
Share premium reserve | |||
Retained earnings | ( | ( | |
Net result for the year | ( | ( | |
Total equity | |||
Non-current liabilities | |||
Lease liabilities | |||
Employee related provisions | |||
Borrowings | |||
Deferred taxes | |||
Total non-current liabilities | |||
Current liabilities | |||
Borrowings | |||
Current income tax payable | |||
Trade payables and other current liabilities | |||
Total current liablities | |||
Total equity and liabilities |
in € thousands | Notes | 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flow from operating activities | |||||
Net result for the year | ( | ( | |||
Financing costs | |||||
Income tax expense | ( | ( | |||
Adjustments for: | |||||
Amortisation intangible fixed assets | |||||
Depreciation tangible fixed assets | |||||
Impairment of goodwill | |||||
Movements in: | |||||
Provisions | ( | ( | |||
Trade receivables and other current assets | ( | ||||
Contract assets | ( | ||||
Trade payables and other current liabilities | |||||
| ( | |||||
Cash generated from operations | |||||
Interest paid | |||||
Income tax paid | ( | ||||
Net cash flow (used in)/from operating activities | |||||
Cash flow from investing activities | |||||
Acquisition of investment in a subsidiary | ( | ( | |||
Investment in intangible fixed assets | ( | ( | |||
Investment in tangible fixed assets | ( | ( | |||
Disposal of tangible fixed assets | |||||
Loans provided | ( | ( | |||
Repayment of loans | |||||
Net cash flow (used in)/from investing activities | ( | ( | |||
Cash flow from financing activities | |||||
Proceeds from loans | |||||
Proceeds from bonds | |||||
Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings | ( | ||||
Repayment of loans | ( | ( | |||
Repayment of lease liabilities | ( | ( | |||
Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities | ( | ||||
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | |||||
Movements in cash and cash equivalents | ( | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | |||||
in € thousands | Notes | Issued capital | Share premium reserve | Retained earnings | Result for the year | Total equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at 1 January 2024 | ( | |||||
Appropriation of the result 2023 | ( | |||||
Other | ||||||
Result for the year 2024 | ( | ( | ||||
Balance at 31 December 2024 | ( | ( | ||||
Appropriation of the result 2024 | ( | |||||
Result for the year 2025 | ( | ( | ||||
Balance at 31 December 2025 | ( | ( |
The Company has issued bonds which have been listed on the Open Market of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since the issue date and, as from 15 December 2025, have also been admitted to trading on Nasdaq STO Corporate Bonds of Nasdaq Stockholm AB. The bonds mature on 16 December 2029 and bear interest at EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus a margin of 5.75%. Fur further details please refer to note 23 Borrowings.
The consolidated financial statements of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. for the year ended 31 December 2025 were authorised for issue by the Management Board on 29 April 2026, were signed by the Management Board on 29 April 2026 and will be submitted for adoption to the General Meeting. The consolidated annual report of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. comprises the Company and its subsidiaries (together “Team EIFFEL” or “the Group”). The following subsidiaries form part of the consolidated annual report:
Team EIFFEL B.V. (100%) - Bussum
ConQuaestor Interim Professionals B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Banking Professionals B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Beheer B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Engineering B.V. (100%) – Bussum
DPA Finance B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA IT B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Legal B.V. (100%) – Bussum
DPA Nederland B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Overheid B.V. (100%) – Bussum
DPA PeopleGroup B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Privacy B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Supply Chain People B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
DPA Tax B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
Fagro Consultancy B.V. (100%) – Beek (LB)
GEOS IT Professionals B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
P.A. Jones B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
SOZA XPERT B.V. (100%) – Tilburg
Claimingo B.V. (100%) – Utrecht
DPA Digital B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
Yobz B.V. (100%) – Amsterdam
Toren Holding B.V. (100%) - Arnhem
Eiffel Beheer B.V. (100%) - Arnhem
Eiffel B.V. (100%) - Arnhem
Legal Center Eiffel B.V. (100%) - Arnhem
AnalyseCentrum B.V. (100%) - Arnhem
Ruimte in Advies B.V. (100%) - Roermond
GemVast B.V. (100%) - 's-Gravenhage
Nieuwe Hoogten Holding B.V. (100%) - 's-Gravenhage
Palladio Groep B.V. (100%) - 's-Gravenhage
InterConsulting Group B.V. (100%) - Utrecht
Balance Ervaring op Projectbasis B.V. (100%) - Utrecht
Task Integraal Projectmanagement B.V. (100%) - Utrecht
Task Product & Contractmanagement B.V. (100%) - Utrecht
Primaned Projectadvies B.V. (100%) - Capelle aan den IJssel
Thorbecke Holding B.V. (100%) - Zwolle
Thorbecke B.V. (100%) - Zwolle
Thorbecke Applicaties B.V. (100%) - Zwolle
Careffect (100%) - Bilthoven
Clafis Houdster B.V. (100%) - Heerenveen
Clafis Groep B.V. (100%) - Heerenveen
Clafis B.V. (100%) - Heerenveen
Wepro Group B.V. (100% acquired as per 24 April 2025) - Wageningen
Wepro Selekt B.V. (100% acquired as per 24 April 2025) - Wageningen
Wepro Engineering B.V. (100% acquired as per 24 April 2025) - Wageningen
Wepro Engineering en Infra B.V. (100% acquired as per 24 April 2025) - Wageningen
Wepro Projekt Engineering B.V. (100% acquired as per 24 April 2025) - Wageningen
Wepro Projecten B.V. (100% acquired as per 24 April 2025) - Wageningen
The following entities are not included in the consolidated annual report, but recognised as an associated subsidiary:
VOF BBIM SCB (25%) - Maarn
The Group has prepared the consolidated annual report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (EU-IFRS) and with Part 2 Book 9 of the Dutch Civil Code.
The annual report is prepared on the historical cost basis, unless stated otherwise.
The annual report is presented in euros. This is the presentation currency of the Group and the functional currency of the Group. All amounts are stated in thousands, unless stated otherwise.
The Group has prepared the consolidated annual report on a going concern basis. In assessing the appropriateness of the going concern assumption, management considered the Group’s financial position, expected future cash flows, available financing facilities and market developments, and assessed whether the Group has sufficient resources to continue its operations for at least twelve months from the date of preparation of this consolidated annual report. For further information on liquidity risk and other risks that could impact the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, reference is made to section 26 Financial risk management.
In the current year, the Group has applied the following amendment to IFRS Accounting Standards issued by the IASB, which is mandatorily effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2025. Its adoption did not have a material impact on the disclosures or on the amounts reported in these financial statements:
Amendments to IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates – Lack of Exchangeability
At the date of authorisation of this annual report, The Group has not applied the following new and revised IFRS Accounting Standards that have been issued but are not yet effective:
Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 Amendments to the Classification and Measurement of Financial Instruments
Annual Improvements to IFRS Accounting Standards – Volume 11 Amendments to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and its accompanying Guidance on implementing IFRS 7, IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, and IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows
Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7 Contracts Referencing Nature-dependent Electricity
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosures in Financial Statements
IFRS 19 Subsidiaries without Public Accountability: Disclosures
Considerations relating to IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosure in Financial Statements are set out below.
IFRS 18 Presentation and Disclosures in Financial Statements, which replaces IAS 1, is expected to have a limited impact on the Group’s consolidated and company-only financial statements. The expected impact relates primarily to changes in presentation and disclosure, rather than measurement or recognition. Based on the Group’s initial assessment:
Revenue and expenses will be presented in accordance with the new IFRS defined categories, with the majority of the Group’s results expected to remain within the operating category.
Operating profit will be presented in line with the new mandatory subtotals introduced by IFRS 18.
Finance income and finance costs, including interest on borrowings and lease liabilities, will be presented within the financing category.
EBITDA, which is used by management as a key performance indicator, is expected to qualify as a management defined performance measure under IFRS 18. This will require additional disclosures, including a reconciliation to the closest IFRS defined subtotal.
Additional note disclosures are expected, including enhanced disaggregation of revenue and expenses and reconciliation information between the IFRS 18 presentation and the previously applied IAS 1 presentation.
The Group will continue to refine its assessment as implementation guidance is further applied and the impact on the consolidated and company-only financial statements is analysed in more detail.
The policies described below have been consistently applied by the Group entities in all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated annual report includes the financial data of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. and its subsidiaries (together referred to as 'Team EIFFEL' or 'Group'). The Group applies the full consolidation method. Subsidiaries are companies in which the Group exercises effective influence over business and financial policies. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control over their policies commences until the date on which control ceases. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the Group's accounting policies.
The financial data of the group companies and the other legal entities and companies included in the consolidation are included in full in the consolidated financial statements with elimination of intercompany relationships and transactions. In the case of a minority interest, the share in the equity of a subsidiary is presented separately as part of the consolidated equity (as minority shareholders). The share of income attributable to minority shareholders is presented separately in the income statement (as income attributable to minority shareholders). It is added to or deducted from the minority interest, even if this results in the minority interest having a negative balance. The financial data of subsidiaries disposed of during the year remain included in the consolidation until there is no longer any control.
The results of newly acquired group companies and the other legal entities and companies included in the consolidation are consolidated from the date of acquisition.
Transactions between majority and minority shareholders that do not involve the acquisition or loss of control are treated as transactions between two shareholders. The results on these transactions are recorded in equity.
Acquisitions of businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration transferred in a business combination is measured at fair value, which is calculated as the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of assets transferred by the group, liabilities incurred by the group to the former owners of the acquiree and the equity interest issued by the group in exchange for control of the acquiree. Acquisition-related costs are recognised in profit or loss as incurred.
At the acquisition date, the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are recognised at their fair value at the acquisition date, except that:
Deferred tax assets or liabilities and assets or liabilities related to employee benefit arrangements are recognised and measured in accordance with IAS 12 and IAS 19 Employee Benefits respectively;
Liabilities or equity instruments related to share-based payment arrangements of the acquiree or share-based payment arrangements of the group entered into to replace share-based payment arrangements of the acquiree are measured in accordance with IFRS 2 Share-based Payment at the acquisition date;
Assets (or disposal groups) that are classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations are measured in accordance with that Standard.
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree, and the fair value of the acquirers previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. If, after reassessment, the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed exceeds the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree and the fair value of the acquirers previously held interest in the acquiree (if any), the excess is recognised immediately in profit or loss as a bargain purchase gain.
When the consideration transferred by the group in a business combination includes a contingent consideration arrangement, the contingent consideration is measured at its acquisition-date fair value and included as part of the consideration transferred in a business combination. Changes in fair value of the contingent consideration that qualify as measurement period adjustments are adjusted retrospectively, with corresponding adjustments against goodwill. Measurement period adjustments are adjustments that arise from additional information obtained during the ‘measurement period’ (which cannot exceed one year from the acquisition date) about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date.
The subsequent accounting for changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration that do not qualify as measurement period adjustments depends on how the contingent consideration is classified. Contingent consideration that is classified as equity is not remeasured at subsequent reporting dates and its subsequent settlement is accounted for within equity. Other contingent consideration is remeasured to fair value at subsequent reporting dates with changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
When a business combination is achieved in stages, the group's previously held interests (including joint operations) in the acquired entity are remeasured to its acquisition-date fair value and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognised in profit or loss. Amounts arising from interests in the acquiree prior to the acquisition date that have previously been recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss, where such treatment would be appropriate if that interest were disposed of.
Goodwill arising from business combinations is recognized in intangible fixed assets. Goodwill is stated at cost less accumulated impairment losses.
Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment at least once a year. Goodwill is allocated from the moment of acquisition to cash-generating units that are expected to generate synergy benefits. Impairment losses are initially allocated to the carrying amount of goodwill of the related cash-generating unit and then deducted pro rata from the carrying amount of its other long-term assets. An impairment loss related to goodwill is not reversed in future periods.
If there is a loss of decisive control when an entity is sold, the goodwill allocated is recognized in the result on sale.
Other intangible fixed assets such as customer relations, brand and trade names, and internally developed software have finite useful lives. They are recognized at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses.
When intangible assets are acquired in a business combination, cost is equal to the fair value at the acquisition date. After initial recognition, they are recognized at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment losses. The fair value of brand and trade names acquired as part of a business combination is determined using the relief-from royalty method. The fair value of customer relationships and order backlog acquired in a business combination is determined using the multi-period excess earnings model, whereby the asset is valued net of a realistic return on all other assets that together create the related cash flows. The fair value of other intangible fixed assets acquired in a business combination is based on the expected present value of the cash flow from the use and eventual sale of the assets.
Internally developed software is capitalized to the extent that it results from the development phase of an internal project. This occurs when it can be demonstrated that the project is technically feasible so that it is suitable for use, the intention is present to complete the project and use the software, the software generates demonstrable future economic benefits, technical, financial and other resources are available to complete and use the software, and it is possible to reliably determine the expenses attributable to the developed software. Software under development is valued at historical cost. Intangible assets under development are not amortized.
The residual value and useful life of other intangible assets are reviewed annually at the balance sheet date and adjusted if necessary. For the development costs a statutory reserve is formed in the amount of the capitalised amount.
Amortisation on intangible fixed assets is charged to the profit and loss statement in accordance with the estimated useful life of the asset. Intangible fixed assets are amortised from the time they are ready for use. Intangible fixed assets are generally amortised on a straight‑line basis, except for the order backlog, which is amortised based on the realisation of the related revenues. The average expected useful life and related amortisation rate for each category of intangible assets are as follows:
Expected useful life | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
Brand and trade names | 1-10 years | 10-100% |
Customer relations | 5-20 years | 5-20% |
Other (software and order backlog) | 1-5 years | 20-100% |
Tangible fixed assets are presented at cost less accumulated depreciation and, if applicable, less impairments in value. Historical cost includes expenditure directly related to the acquisition of the asset. Subsequent expenditure is added to the carrying amount of the asset if it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group and the amount of the economic benefits can be measured reliably. Maintenance costs are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they occur.
Gains and losses on the sale of tangible fixed assets are recognised in the profit or loss statement under general expenses.
Depreciation on tangible fixed assets is charged to the profit or loss statement on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives from the time they are ready for use. The residual value and useful lives of assets are reviewed annually at the balance sheet date and adjusted as necessary. The expected useful lives and related annual depreciation rates for each category of tangible fixed assets are as follows:
Expected useful life | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
Renovations, furnishings and inventory | 5-10 years | 10-20% |
Computer hardware | 3 years | 33% |
At each balance sheet date, the Group evaluates the carrying value of its tangible and intangible fixed assets to determine whether there is any indication that they may be impaired. If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset should be determined. If the asset does not generate cash flows independently of other assets, the Group determines the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
The recoverable amount is the higher of net realisable value and value in use. Net realisable value is the maximum amount at which the asset can be sold (the fair value), less selling costs. Value in use is the present value of estimated future cash flows expected to arise from the continued use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of its useful life. If the recoverable amount of an asset is less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset is written down to its recoverable amount. An impairment is recognised immediately in the income statement.
An impairment loss on an asset other than goodwill is reversed if the indications used in determining the impairment loss are improved or no longer present. Impairment is reversed only to the extent that the carrying amount of the asset does not exceed the carrying amount determined as if the impairment had not been recognised. This takes into account the original depreciation and possible residual value. A reversal of an impairment is recognised in the income statement.
Impairment losses on goodwill are initially allocated to the carrying amount of goodwill of the respective cash-generating unit and then deducted pro rata from the carrying amount of its other long-term assets. An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed in future periods.
The Group assesses at contract inception whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. That is, if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
The Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability in respect of all leases where it is the lessee, except for short-term leases without an option to purchase (defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months or less) and for low-value leases (less than 5,000 euros). For these contracts, the Group recognises lease payments in the income statement over the term of the lease unless another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which the economic benefits of the leased assets are consumed.
The lease term refers to the non-cancellable period of the lease, together with periods covered by an option to extend if it is reasonably certain that the Group will exercise the option. Factors to realise an economic benefit through a potential extension are taken into account when assessing extension options. At the start of the lease and when warranted, the use of an extension option is assessed.
The Group recognises a right-of-use asset at the commencement date of the lease (i.e. the date the underlying asset is available for use). Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and adjusted for any remeasurement of the lease liability. The cost of right-of-use assets includes the amount of lease liabilities recognised, initial direct costs incurred and lease payments made prior to or at the moment the Group enters into the lease, less any lease incentives received. Right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term and the estimated useful life of the asset.
The right-of-use assets are presented as part of 'Tangible fixed assets' in the consolidated statement of financial position.
The Group applies IAS 36 'Impairment' to determine whether a right-of-use asset is impaired and recognises an impairment as described in the policy for ‘ Impairment of tangible and intangible fixed assets’.
Leases may include agreements to purchase other goods or services (non-lease components). These are identified and segregated as a separate part of the lease component. Under IFRS 16, a practical application is possible that allows lessees to choose a policy to treat both the lease asset and the non-lease components as one lease component per category of underlying asset.
For leases of buildings, the total lease cost is split into rental and service costs. Here, a distinction is made between the lease (rent) and the non-lease component (service). The non-lease components are segregated and not included as part of IFRS 16.
For the car lease contracts, the total lease costs are not split into a financing component of the lease car and the non-lease components. The Group takes advantage of the practical application by not distinguishing between lease and non-lease components for the underlying asset (and the entire asset class).
At the commencement date of the lease, the Group recognizes a lease liability measured at present value of lease payments to be made over the lease term. The lease payments include fixed payments less any lease incentives receivable, variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, and amounts expected to be paid under residual value guarantees.
If it is not possible to determine the interest rate implicit in the lease, the present value is calculated on the basis of an incremental borrowing rate (IBR) on the commencement date of the contract, which is determined on the basis of the underlying asset and the term of the lease contract in question. The IBR is the rate of interest that the Group would have to pay to borrow over a similar term, and with a similar security, the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to the right-of-use asset in a similar economic environment. The IBR therefore reflects what the Group ‘would have to pay’, which requires estimation when no observable rates are available (such as for subsidiaries that do not enter into financing transactions) or when they need to be adjusted to reflect the terms and conditions of the lease (for example, when leases are not in the subsidiary their functional currency). The Group estimates the IBR using observable inputs, such as interest rates.
After the commencement date, the amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made. In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the lease payments (e.g., changes to future payments resulting from a change in an index or rate used to determine such lease payments) or a change in the assessment of an option to purchase the underlying asset.
The lease liability is presented as a separate line item in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Contracts costs relate to transaction costs associated with the revolving facility for additional working capital purposes. These costs are capitalized and amortised on a straight–line basis over the period of the facility.
Financial assets and liabilities are recognised in the Group's financial position when it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Financial assets and liabilities other than fair value through profit or loss are initially measured at fair value plus/minus transaction costs. Trade receivables that do not have a significant financing component are initially measured at their transaction price.
Financial assets relate to loans, receivables and contract assets. The receivables consist of loans to (former) subsidiaries, (trade) receivables, unbilled revenues and cash and cash equivalents. Contract assets represent the Group’s right to consideration in exchange for services that have been transferred to a customer, where this right is conditional upon the satisfaction of contractual criteria other than the passage of time. Loans, receivables and contract assets are financial instruments with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market.
The subsequent valuation of these financial assets is at amortised cost if two criteria are met:
The business model is to hold the assets to realise contractual cash flows;
The contractual terms of the instrument provide for cash flows on specific dates and the cash flows relate only to principal and interest on the remaining principal.
After initial recognition, loans, receivables and contract assets are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method less any impairment losses.
If the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or if the Group transfers the contractual rights to receive the cash flows from the financial asset through a transaction that includes substantially all the risks and rewards associated with the ownership of this asset, the Group de recognises a financial asset from its financial position.
The Group recognises an allowance for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost. the Group uses the simplified impairment model for this purpose as there is no significant financing element. Provisions are deducted from the gross carrying amount of financial assets measured at amortised cost. The addition to the provision for expected credit losses is charged directly to the income statement.
The Group recognises an expected credit loss for the entire remaining term of the trade debtors, unbilled revenues and contract assets. The expected credit loss on trade debtors, unbilled revenues and contract assets is primarily determined using an allowance matrix. This is based on historical credit losses on trade receivables, unbilled revenues and contract assets. The allowance additionally takes into account information available at reasonable cost and effort on economic developments and future expectations regarding individual positions. Trade receivables that are in bankruptcy or in suspension of payments are fully provided for.
For other financial assets, a credit loss is recognised equal to the expected loss in the first 12 months of the financial asset's life. The expected loss comprises the present value of all financial defaults over the life of a financial asset multiplied by the probability of a financial default occurring in the first 12 months of the financial asset's life. If it is later found that the credit risk has increased significantly, the loss is increased by the expected losses based on the entire remaining maturity. To determine the expected credit loss, the Group uses information available with reasonable cost and effort. This includes quantitative and qualitative information as well as historical and forward-looking information.
The subsequent measurement of a financial liability is at amortised cost or at fair value through profit or loss. A financial liability is measured at fair value through profit or loss if it is part of a trading portfolio, is a derivative or this basis was chosen at initial measurement. All other financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
The financial liabilities concern only other financial liabilities. Other financial liabilities consist of loans and trade payables. Initial recognition of acquired loans occurs on the date the Group becomes a contract party. For all other financial liabilities, initial recognition takes place on the transaction date. Such liabilities are measured on initial recognition at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. After initial recognition, these financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. This method is based on the expected flow of cash outflows. It takes into account the probability of early redemption of the underlying financial instrument and direct costs and revenues. These include, for example, transaction fees charged.
The Group no longer recognises a financial liability in its financial position when the underlying performance has been met or has been cancelled or expired.
Associated companies are entities over which the Group can exercise significant influence, but has no control. Associated companies are valued using the equity method. Initial recognition is at cost, which is then adjusted for the Group's share of changes in the associated company's comprehensive income. The valuation of these associated companies includes goodwill arising on acquisition, less accumulated impairment losses. The company's share in the results of associated companies over which significant influence can be exercised is recognised in the profit or loss statement (under 'Share of profit of associated companies').
The cumulative movements in the equity of the associated companies are recognised in proportion to the company's interest in the associated companies. Recognition of the Group's share (of profit) of associated companies in the statement of financial position and profit or loss statement is discontinued as soon as this would cause the value of the associated companies in the balance sheet to become negative, while the Group has not incurred any liabilities or made any payments on behalf of the associated company.
Cash and cash equivalents includes current account balances with banks and demand deposits. In case of a net debt position, this is added to short-term loans. Cash is measured at fair value, usually equal to face value. Bank overdrafts are included in cash and cash equivalents only when they are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group’s cash management. In all other cases, bank overdrafts are presented as short-term loans.
Issued capital comprises the nominal amounts paid up on issued shares. The share premium reserve comprises the amounts paid up on issued shares to the extent that such payments exceed the nominal value of the shares concerned. On a movement due to issuance of treasury shares, the amount of consideration received less directly attributable costs (net of taxes) is recognised as a movement in equity under issued capital and, if applicable, under share premium reserve.
If the Group repurchases its own shares, the amount of the consideration paid is recognised as a movement in equity. This includes directly attributable costs (net of taxes). Repurchased shares are classified as treasury shares and presented as a deduction from the share premium reserve in equity. At the time of sale of previously repurchased shares, the amount of the consideration received - less directly attributable costs (net of taxes) - is recognised under repurchased shares in equity for the amount of the consideration originally received. The difference is recognised in the general reserve.
A dividend distribution to the shareholders is recognised as a current liability in the period in which the dividend is approved by the General Meeting but not yet paid.
A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when the Group has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are measured at the present value of managements best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period.
If the effect is material, the amount of provisions is determined by discounting the estimated future cash flows using an interest rate that reflects the current time value of money and, if applicable, the specific risks of the liability. The accretion of the provision is recognised as a finance charge in the profit or loss statement.
Team EIFFEL is the community where talent and expertise merge into the largest consultancy-, project and interim organisation in the Netherlands.
The Group assesses whether there are separate performance obligations within a contract. A performance obligation is the promise to the customer to deliver services. A performance obligation may relate to a delivery of an individual service or to a series of individually distinguishable services that have broadly similar characteristics and a similar pattern of delivery. A performance obligation is established at the start of the contract on the basis of the contractual terms and conditions.
Revenue is recognised per individual performance obligation up to the amount expected to be received. This takes into account any variable fees and significant financing elements. Non-cash fees and fees paid to the customer are excluded.
When determining the transaction price, variable fees are taken into account to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal of this variable fee will not occur in the cumulatively recognised revenue. Estimates of variable fees are reviewed periodically and updated if necessary.
The Group only has payment terms of less than one year. In this context, the Group makes use of the practical exception under IFRS by which a financing element is not taken into account. Discounts are recognised against revenue at each reporting time unless it is highly probable that the discount will not be provided to the customer. Depending on the contractual form of discount, the discount is determined based on the revenue already recognised and the current estimate of the total revenue to be recognised. Net revenue from services relates to the counter-performance received and receivable from third parties during the financial year by virtue of the fair value of the services provided excluding taxes and discounts levied on them. These are the hours worked at the agreed rates.
The Group recognises revenue from services rendered in proportion to the stage of completion of the transaction at reporting date 'over time' for secondment assignments and other services. The stage of completion is determined based on the work performed by a professional in accordance with the hours written in the contractually agreed period. If services are provided under one contract in different reporting periods, the fee is allocated on a time-weighted basis.
Gross profit is the difference between net revenue and direct costs on professionals employed with clients, referred to as cost of sales. In particular, direct costs include direct staff costs, third-party hiring and other direct costs allocated to the period in which the corresponding revenue is recognised and are recognised at historical cost price
The Group recognises revenue based on the amount the Group expects to receive in exchange for the services provided. Where fixed-contract contracts are involved, the Group estimates the services performed up to the reporting date as a percentage of the total services to be performed. This estimate is based on periodically available information on the status of the relevant projects and past experience in similar situations.
Several pension schemes apply within the Group. These are defined contribution plans funded by contributions to an insurance company. A defined contribution plan concerns post-employment benefits where the Group pays fixed contributions to the insurance company. Here the Group has no legal or constructive obligation to make further contributions. The actuarial risks and investment risks lie entirely with the participants. If the insurance company has insufficient funds to make pension payments to all employees in respect of services rendered by the employees in current and prior periods, the Group has no legally enforceable or factual obligations to make additional contributions.
Obligations related to defined contribution pension plans are recognised as an expense in the profit or loss statement during the period in which the employees render the related service. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that they result in cash refunds or reductions in future payments. Contributions due to a defined contribution plan that are payable more than 12 months after the end of the period in which the employees render the related service are discounted to their present value.
In addition to the defined contribution plan, a subsidiary of the Group had a defined benefit plan for some of its employees in the past. This defined benefit plan was terminated as of 31 December 2020. The 19 active members joined a defined contribution plan as of 1 January 2021. As part of the termination of the pension scheme, the 19 active members receive a compensation plan for the five years 2021-2025 as long as they remain employed. This compensation arrangement expired in full as of 31 December 2025.
Short-term employee benefits are benefits payable within one year of the end of the financial year in which the employee provided the services. These include salaries (including holiday pay) and all fixed and variable allowances, employee insurance contributions, continued payment of salary during illness and variable remuneration. Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured at the non-discounted amount the Group expects to have to pay in exchange for the related service.
Termination benefits are employee benefits payable as a result of the Group's decision to terminate an employee's employment before the normal retirement date or an employee's decision to voluntarily resign in exchange for an offered benefit. The cost of termination benefits is fully reflected in the profit or loss statement at the time of decision-making on this matter if they are unconditionally linked. Benefits that are not expected to be settled within 12 months after the balance sheet date are discounted.
The Management Equity Plan (“MEP”) is classified as an equity-settled plan. Equity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. In the current MEP the fair value of the depositary receipts at grant date equals the subscription price paid by the participants of the plan. Therefore, no expense is recognized by the Company for the awards granted.
Finance income comprises interest income. Finance costs include interest expenses and interest accrued on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest expense and income are calculated using the effective interest method and recognised on a time proportionate basis in the income statement.
The income tax is calculated based on applicable tax laws and rates. Exempt profit components and non-deductible expenses are taken into account when calculating income tax. Income tax concerns profit taxes due and recoverable over the reporting period and deferred income taxes. Available tax losses are taken into account when calculating taxes on profit to the extent that set-off against future taxable profits is deemed realisable. Taxes are recognised in the profit or loss statement with the exception of taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity or comprehensive income. In those cases, the related taxes are also recognised directly in equity or comprehensive income.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences between the values of assets and liabilities according to the accounting policies followed in the financial statements and tax regulations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to offset resulting current taxes receivable and payable against each other and if the deferred taxes relate to the same tax authority. Deferred tax assets are measured to the extent that offset against future taxable profits is considered probable. This also applies to deferred tax assets arising from loss carry forwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period in which the asset is realised or the liability is settled. This is based on the tax rates (and legislation) whose legislative process has been (materially) concluded by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at nominal value.
No deferred tax liability is recognised for the following temporary differences:
Goodwill;
Initial recognition of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit;
Differences related to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they are unlikely to be settled in the foreseeable future and the timing of which can be controlled by the Group.
An operating segment is a business unit that performs activities that may result in revenues and expenses, also in connection with transactions with other Group units. All operating results of an operating segment are periodically reviewed by the board for the purpose of decision-making on resource allocation and performance evaluation. This is based on the available financial information per operating segment. The results per operating segment reported to the board include items that can be attributed directly or reasonably to the segment. The revenue realised in the segments concerns the income from deployment on an interim and project basis of specialised professionals or fixed fees agreed with the client for services provided by the Group professionals.
For further explanation on segment information, please refer to 5 Segment information.
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be traded or a liability settled on the measurement date in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable parties in the primary or, if not present, the most advantageous market accessible to the Group on that date. The fair value of a liability reflects the risk of default.
If available, the Group determines the fair value of a financial instrument using the quoted price in an active market for that instrument (Level 1). A market is considered active if transactions for the asset or liability take place with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on a continuous basis. If there is no price quotation in an active market, the Group determines fair value using valuation techniques that maximise the use of relevant observable inputs (Level 2) and minimise unobservable inputs (Level 3). The chosen valuation technique includes all factors that market participants would consider when pricing the transaction.
The Group’s significant estimates and assumptions, including those applied in determining fair values, are described in section 6 Estimates and further detailed, where applicable, in the relevant notes to the financial statements.
The cash flow statement has been prepared using the indirect method. The cash for the purpose of the cash flow statement consists of the balance sheet item cash and cash equivalents. Short-term loans are considered 'Cash flow from financing activities'. Income taxes, interest received and paid and dividends received are included under 'Cash flow from operating activities'.
Lease payments (excluding finance charges) and dividends paid are included under 'Cash flow from financing activities'.
The acquisition price paid for acquired subsidiaries and the sales price received for disposed subsidiaries are included under 'Cash flow from investing activities'. Cash acquired is deducted from the acquisition price. Changes in assets and liabilities resulting from the acquisition and disposal of subsidiaries have been taken into account in determining cash flows.
For the year 2025, the Group has identified four operating segments in accordance with IFRS 8 Operating Segments.
The Management Board acts as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) and is responsible for allocating resources to, and assessing the performance of, the Group’s operating segments. Operating results are reported to and reviewed by the Management Board on a monthly basis in line with the internal management and reporting structure.
The Group’s operating segments correspond to the Group’s four Business Lines, each of which represents a distinct area of expertise and is managed by a Business Line Director. The Management Board’s decision making is based on the financial and operational information provided for these Business Lines.
In accordance with the management approach prescribed by IFRS 8, the Group’s reportable segments are based on how internal governance, reporting and decision‑making are organised as well as the nature of the services provided. The Group’s reportable segments are:
Legal advisory - interim legal professionals and advisory services to public and private sector clients;
Engineering & Project Management (E&PM) - engineering, technical consultancy and project management services related to infrastructure, energy and the physical living environment;
Finance advisory - interim finance and control professionals and financial advisory services;
Financial services - consultancy and secondment services related to financial institutions, compliance, risk management and operational support.
From a financial perspective, the Management Board assesses the performance of the Business Lines primarily on the basis of revenue and EBITDA, as reported in the internal management reports reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM). EBITDA represents earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation and is used by management as an internal performance measure. EBITDA is not a measure defined under IFRS and should not be considered as an alternative to operating profit or net profit as presented in the consolidated financial statements. Segment results, assets and liabilities include those items that are directly attributable or can be reasonably allocated to the relevant operating segment.
The Group’s activities are predominantly concentrated in the Netherlands. In 2025, approximately 99% of the Group’s consolidated revenue was generated in the Netherlands. As a result, no further geographical information is presented.
For the year 2025, there were no individual customers for which revenues exceeded 10% of the Group’s total consolidated revenue.
in € thousands | Legal Advisory | E&PM | Finance Advisory | Financial Services | Holding/ Eliminations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025 | ||||||
Revenue | 97,898 | 118,330 | 71,741 | 35,174 | - | 323,143 |
EBITDA | 9,719 | 11,198 | 2,521 | 2,136 | - | 25,574 |
Amortisation intangible fixed assets | 5,223 | 9,076 | 2,680 | 2,057 | - | 19,036 |
Depreciation tangible fixed assets | 4,989 | 6,402 | 3,649 | 1,798 | - | 16,838 |
Impairment of goodwill | - | - | - | 5,060 | - | 5,060 |
Operating profit | (493) | (4,280) | (3,808) | (6,779) | - | (15,360) |
Financing income/(costs) | - | - | - | - | (26,925) | (26,925) |
Result before taxes | (493) | (4,280) | (3,808) | (6,779) | (26,925) | (42,285) |
Income tax expense | - | - | - | - | (3,835) | (3,835) |
Net result for the year | (493) | (4,280) | (3,808) | (6,779) | (23,090) | (38,450) |
Total assets | 175,550 | 196,410 | 104,716 | 47,590 | 62,016 | 586,282 |
Total (non)-current liabilities | 31,488 | 47,979 | 19,068 | 12,347 | 314,446 | 425,328 |
in € thousands | Legal Advisory | E&PM | Finance Advisory | Financial Services | Holding/ Eliminations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | ||||||
Revenue | 115,195 | 82,367 | 84,092 | 38,652 | - | 320,306 |
EBITDA | 17,117 | 8,425 | 7,470 | 4,374 | - | 37,386 |
Amortisation intangible fixed assets | (11,433) | (11,546) | (8,185) | (4,054) | - | (35,218) |
Depreciation tangible fixed assets | (4,756) | (4,741) | (3,977) | (1,576) | - | (15,050) |
Impairment of goodwill | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Operating profit | 928 | (7,862) | (4,692) | (1,256) | - | (12,882) |
Financing income/(costs) | - | - | - | - | (36,205) | (36,205) |
Result before taxes | 928 | (7,862) | (4,692) | (1,256) | (36,205) | (49,087) |
Income tax expense | - | - | - | - | (7,513) | (7,513) |
Net result for the year | 928 | (7,862) | (4,692) | (1,256) | (28,692) | (41,574) |
Total assets | 208,987 | 194,067 | 116,822 | 54,639 | 27,675 | 602,190 |
Total (non)-current liabilities | 51,185 | 51,399 | 33,866 | 17,691 | 248,657 | 402,798 |
In preparing this consolidated annual report, the Management Board has applied accounting policies that require the exercise of judgement and has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and income and expenses. Actual outcomes may differ from the estimates. Judgements are reviewed on an ongoing basis, and estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed periodically and adjusted where necessary. They are largely based on historical expertise and on the most reliable assessment possible of the factors that, in the opinion of the Management Board, are realistic and appropriate. The estimates and judgements described below represent the Group’s significant estimates, as they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgements in applying the Group’s accounting policies.
In applying the Group’s accounting policies, management has exercised judgement in determining the appropriate cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing and in identifying and separately recognising intangible assets acquired in business combinations. These judgements relate primarily to the allocation of goodwill to cash-generating units and to the identification of customer relationships, brand and trade names and other intangible assets acquired as part of business combinations. These judgements do not involve significant estimation uncertainty and are therefore not expected to result in material adjustments to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year.
In accordance with IAS 1.129, further information on the nature of the estimation uncertainty, key assumptions applied and the sensitivity to changes in those assumptions is disclosed in the relevant notes to the consolidated financial statements, as referenced below.
The Group assesses at least annually for the (groups of) cash-generating units whether the goodwill allocated to the respective (groups of) cash-generating units is impaired. An impairment exists if the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of cash-generating units to which intangible assets are allocated (as defined in note 16 Intangible fixed assets) is determined, among other things, by value-in-use calculations. These calculations include the use of estimates regarding future sales, gross profit margin, EBITDA margin, operating expenses and discount rate, as well as the expected growth rate and estimated value at the end of the horizon. For a detailed explanation of the impairment test performed, see note 16 Intangible fixed assets.
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination and recognised separately from goodwill are recognised initially at their fair value at the acquisition date. When intangible assets are acquired in a business combination, cost is equal to the fair value at the acquisition date. The fair value of brand and trade names acquired as part of a business combination is determined using the relief-royalty method. The fair value of customer relationships acquired in a business combination is determined using the multi-period excess earnings model, whereby the asset is valued net of a realistic return on all other assets that together create the related cash flows.
For purposes of determining the fair value of the business enterprise value ("BEV") of the Target, the income approach, or more specifically the Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”) method is applied. The BEV is calculated as a sum of discounted free cash flows (“FCF”) over the explicit forecast period and a terminal value per Cash Generating Unit. These calculations include the use of estimates regarding future sales, gross profit margin, EBITDA margin, operating expenses and discount rate, as well as the long-term growth rate . For a detailed explanation of the actual business combinations, see note 7 Scope of consolidation.
The following changes to the scope of consolidation were made in 2025:
Acquisition of Wepro Group B.V. and and its subsidiaries on 24 April 2025
On 24 April 2025 Eiffel Beheer B.V. (a subsidiary of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V.) acquired 100% of the issued share capital of Wepro Group B.V., based in Wageningen, The Netherlands. Wepro Group B.V. is a consulting and engineering company that provides consultancy services by deploying consultants in the fields of Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Installation Engineering, Energy, Infrastructure, and Civil Engineering. The company was incorporated in 1998 and is headquartered in Wageningen, the Netherlands. The business combination has been accounted for using the acquisition method. We refer to the Accounting principles for business combinations for further elaboration.
The acquisition is in line with the Group’s strategy to strengthen its position in the Engineering & Project Management business lines. It expands the Group’s expertise and position within the Dutch engineering consultancy market. Control was obtained through the acquisition of 100% of the issued share capital of Wepro Group B.V.
Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries will be integrated in the consolidated financial statements of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. from 25 April 2025. The total purchase price for 100% of the shares of Wepro Group B.V. is 24.6 million euros. The purchase price has been financed through the revolving facility for additional working capital purposes totalling 15.0 million euros, a rollover loan note of 2.5 million euros and cash of 3.0 million euros. The consideration transferred includes an earn-out arrangement contingent on the achievement of EBITDA targets over the financial years 2025 and 2026. As at 25 April 2025, the fair value of the contingent consideration was valued at 3.6 million euros (4.6 million euros undiscounted). The contingent consideration has been classified as a financial liability.
From the acquisition date of 24 April 2025 to 31 December 2025, Wepro Group B.V. contributed 13.4 million euros to the Group’s revenue and 2.2 million euros to the Group’s profit for the period. Had the acquisition of Wepro Group B.V. occurred on 1 January 2025, the Group’s revenue would have amounted to 20.7 million euros and the Group’s profit for the year would have amounted to 3.5 million euros.
As at acquisition date the fair values of assets, liabilities and cash flow on account of the acquisition were as follows:
in € thousands | 24 April 2025 |
|---|---|
Tangible fixed assets | 36,405 |
Trade receivables and other current assets | 3,275,641 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1,705,098 |
Minus: Loans | (543,169) |
Minus: Trade payables and other current liabilities | (2,529,288) |
Total identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | 1,944,687 |
Total consideration transferred | 24,090,869 |
Total identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed | 1,944,687 |
Goodwill to be allocated | 22,146,182 |
Goodwill | 15,609,162 |
Brand and trade names | 1,069,000 |
Customer relations | 4,996,000 |
Other | 2,745,000 |
Deferred tax liabilities | (2,272,980) |
Goodwill to be allocated | 22,146,182 |
The following changes to the scope of consolidation were made in 2024:
Acquisition of Careffect B.V. on 19 July 2024
Acquisition of Clafis Houdster B.V. and and its subsidiaries on 30 September 2024
This relates to revenue from professional secondment of employees for the business lines 'Legal advisory', 'Engineering & Project Management', 'Finance advisory' and 'Financial services'.
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Revenue | 323,143 | 320,306 |
For the segment information we refer to section 5 Segment information.
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Cost of sales refers to the cost of secondees: | ||
Direct personnel expenses | 178,589 | 164,733 |
Other direct expenses | 45,761 | 50,968 |
Total | 224,350 | 215,701 |
The direct personnel expenses mainly relate to wages and salaries, social security charges and pension expenses. The other direct expenses mainly relate to freelancers and car expenses.
'Direct personnel costs' include 0.4 million euros in restructuring charges (2024: 0.1 million). Other restructuring costs are included in the indirect personnel costs (see note 11 General expenses) and amount to 2.5 million euros (2024: 2.4 million).
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Indirect personnel and related expenses | 32,105 | 28,571 |
Advertising and marketing | 2,959 | 3,665 |
Housing expenses | 549 | 603 |
Total | 35,613 | 32,839 |
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Indirect personnel expenses | 16,064 | 16,757 |
Depreciation | 16,838 | 15,050 |
Amortisation | 19,036 | 35,218 |
Impairment of goodwill | 5,060 | - |
Housing expenses | 549 | 603 |
Other general expenses | 20,981 | 17,020 |
Total | 78,528 | 84,648 |
The following fees have been recognized in the profit or loss statement for the auditor:
2025 | 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
in € thousands | Deloitte | Other accountants | Totaal | Deloitte | Other accountants | Total |
Audit of financial statements | 502 | - | 502 | 567 | - | 567 |
Other audit services | 100 | - | 100 | - | - | - |
Totaal | 602 | - | 602 | 567 | - | 567 |
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Total wages and salaries, social security and pension expenses included in operating income is: | ||
Salaries | 182,510 | 168,940 |
Social charges | 32,595 | 30,688 |
Pension expenses | 9,724 | 8,517 |
224,829 | 208,145 | |
Other personnel expenses | 1,929 | 1,916 |
Total | 226,758 | 210,061 |
These personnel expenses have been recognized under the following headings in the income statement: | ||
Cost of sales | 178,589 | 164,733 |
Selling expenses | 32,105 | 28,571 |
General expenses | 16,064 | 16,757 |
Total | 226,758 | 210,061 |
The average number of employees (FTE) during the fiscal year was as follows: | ||
Direct employees | 2,427 | 2,402 |
Indirect employees | 422 | 396 |
Total | 2,850 | 2,797 |
The costs of freelancers are not included in the 'Wages and salaries', but in the 'Other direct costs' (see also note 9 Cost of sales).
The pension expenses are included in the cost of sales for 7.9 million euros (2024: 6.9 million) and in other general expenses for 1.8 million euros (2024: 1.6 million). Service and administration costs under the defined benefit plan are for 80% charged to the cost of sales and for 20% to the general expenses in proportion to the ratio of direct professionals to indirect professionals. Accrued interest is recognised as finance costs.
Defined contribution plan: The Group has several pension plans that qualify as defined contribution pension plans. The Group has recognised the premium payable to these parties as an expense in the profit or loss statement. Further information on this is included in section Pensions and other employee benefits. Based on the implementation regulations, the Group has no obligation to pay additional contributions other than through higher future contributions in the event of a deficit in the fund. At 31 December 2025, there are no liabilities for which a pension provision has been recognised.
In addition to the defined contribution plan, a subsidiary of the Group had a defined benefit plan for some of its employees in the past. This defined benefit plan was terminated as of 31 December 2020. The 19 active members joined a defined contribution plan as of 1 January 2021. As part of the termination of the pension scheme, the 19 active members receive a compensation plan for the five years 2021-2025 as long as they remain employed. The compensation plan ends on 31 December 2025. Consequently, no liability will remain after the end of the 2025 financial year, as the Group’s obligation under the compensation arrangement fully expires at that date. The total liability of the compensation scheme as at 31 December 2025 is as follows:
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Compensation pension plan Fagro | - | 42 |
Total | - | 42 |
In determining the liability of the compensation scheme, the discount rate used is 0.91% (2024: 0.91%).
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Interest on bank overdrafts and loans | 21,490 | 21,988 |
Interest on lease liabilities | 3,408 | 2,908 |
Capitalised financing expenses | 1,837 | 8,851 |
Other finance costs | 190 | 2,458 |
Total | 26,925 | 36,205 |
For further details please refer to note 26 Financial risk management.
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Income tax current year | 1,202 | 3,742 |
Income tax for prior years | 27 | (505) |
Total current inome tax | 1,229 | 3,237 |
Origination and reversal of temporary differences | (5,064) | (10,750) |
Total deferred income tax | (5,064) | (10,750) |
Total income tax | (3,835) | (7,513) |
The deferred income tax result mainly relates to the origination and reversal of temporary differences arising from business combinations. In particular, deferred tax liabilities are recognised on intangible assets acquired in previous years, such as customer relationships and brands, as their fair value for IFRS purposes differs from their tax base. In addition, the deferred tax movement includes effects related to temporary differences arising from the application of IFRS 16. For further details please refer to note 22 Deferred taxes.
Reconciliation of effective tax rate | % | 2025 | % | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Result before taxes | (42,273) | (49,087) | ||
Income tax calculated at the domestic tax rate | 25.8% | 10,906 | 25.8% | 12,664 |
Changes in corporate income tax rate | 0.0% | 14 | 0.0% | 14 |
Permanent differences | -3.0% | (1,258) | 0.1% | 51 |
Non-deductible acquisition related costs | -0.6% | (248) | -1.2% | (601) |
Non-deductible financing costs | -13.1% | (5,542) | -10.5% | (5,163) |
Tax results previous years | -0.1% | (27) | 1.0% | 505 |
Other | 0.0% | (10) | 0.1% | 43 |
Income tax expense in income statement (effective) | 9.1% | 3,835 | 15.3% | 7,513 |
The effective tax rate in 2025 was 9.1%. The effective tax rate in 2025 was 16.7% point lower than the nominal tax rate of 25.8%. The lower effective tax rate of 16.7% point compared to the nominal rate of 25.8% is mainly explained by the permanent differences, non-deductible financing costs and acquisition-related costs. The permanent differences primarily relate to the impairment loss on goodwill, which is not deductible for corporate income tax purposes. The impact of permanent differences is -3.0% (2024: 0.1%). Financing costs incurred during the year include amounts that are not deductible for corporate income tax purposes as a result of statutory limitations on the deductibility of net interest expenses. The impact of the non‑deductible financing costs is -13.1% (2024: -10.5%). These non‑deductible amounts are carried forward in accordance with applicable tax legislation and may be utilised in future periods, subject to the availability of sufficient taxable profit and compliance with the relevant tax requirements. The non-deductible acquisition related costs mainly consist of advisory and transactions expenses associated with the acquisition of Wepro (2024: Clafis and Careffect), that are not tax deductible for corporate income tax purposes, the impact is -0.6% (2024: -1.2%).
The movements in 2025 of intangible fixed assets can be specified as follows:
in € thousands | Goodwill | Brand & | Customer | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost | 260,974 | 24,497 | 182,840 | 23,116 | 491,427 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairments | - | (3,310) | (10,875) | (21,033) | (35,218) |
Book value at 31 December 2024 | 260,974 | 21,187 | 171,965 | 2,083 | 456,209 |
Additions | 15,609 | 1,069 | 4,996 | 2,772 | 24,446 |
Impairment | (5,060) | - | - | - | (5,060) |
Amortisation | - | (3,243) | (12,124) | (3,669) | (19,036) |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 271,523 | 19,013 | 164,837 | 1,186 | 456,559 |
Cost | 276,583 | 25,566 | 187,836 | 25,888 | 510,813 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairments | (5,060) | (6,553) | (22,999) | (24,702) | (54,254) |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 271,523 | 19,013 | 164,837 | 1,186 | 456,559 |
No impairment losses on intangible fixed assets recognised in previous years were reversed in 2025.
Goodwill is allocated to the Group’s cash‑generating units (“CGUs”) for impairment testing purposes. The CGUs correspond to the Group’s operating segments and consist of the following business lines:
Legal advisory;
Engineering & Project management (E&PM);
Finance advisory;
Financial services.
Following the acquisition of Team EIFFEL and subsequent organic growth and acquisitions, the Group has recognised significant amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets. In accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets, goodwill is tested for impairment annually irrespective of whether any indicators of impairment exist, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill may be impaired. The annual impairment test was performed as at 31 December 2025.
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is tested at CGU level, which represents the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes.
The recoverable amount of the CGUs is determined based on value‑in‑use calculations.
Value‑in‑use is calculated by discounting projected future cash flows using a post‑tax weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”), which reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the CGUs.
Cash flow projections are based on management’s approved budgets for 2026 and are extrapolated over a five‑year forecast period. These projections reflect current operational performance, contracted backlog and expected market conditions, as well as management’s best estimate of future economic conditions and the expected operating performance of each CGU.
Key assumptions, including revenue growth, EBITDA margins and terminal growth rates, are derived from historical performance, observed market trends and, where available, external market data. The assumptions applied are reviewed by management and are aligned with the Group’s strategic plan and risk assessments.
The projected cash flows are discounted at a post‑tax discount rate of 11.1% (2024: 10.7% ), which corresponds to a weighted average pre‑tax cost of capital of 14.9% (2024: 14.4%). The risk-free interest rate is based on the German 30-year government bond yield and amounted to 3.5% (2024: 2.6%). Based on a peer group analysis, the applied ratio of market value of equity to debt was determined to be 100:0 (2024: 100:0).
Cash flows beyond the explicit five-year forecast period are extrapolated using a terminal growth rate of 2.0% (2024: 2.1%) per annum. This growth rate does not exceed the long‑term average growth rate of the Netherlands.
The determination of value‑in‑use requires significant management judgement. The key assumptions applied in the impairment test include projected revenue growth, expected EBITDA margins, the terminal growth rate and the applied discount rate, as presented in the table below.
2025 | 2024 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Legal advisory | E&PM | Finance advisory | Financial services | Legal advisory | E&PM | Finance advisory | Financial services | |
Compound Annual Growth Rate Revenue 2026-2030 | 8.5% | 6.8% | 7.3% | 6.2% | 7.0% | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.5% |
Average annual EBITDA margin 2026-2030 | 15.4% | 14.1% | 10.6% | 7.2% | 20.6% | 16.5% | 15.6% | 15.4% |
Terminal growth rate | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% |
Discount rate after taxes | 11.1% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 10.7% | 10.7% | 10.7% | 10.7% |
Discount rate pre taxes | 14.9% | 14.9% | 14.9% | 14.9% | 14.4% | 14.4% | 14.4% | 14.4% |
Based on the impairment test performed using the methodology described above, the Group recognised an impairment loss of 5.1 million euros in 2025 relating to goodwill allocated to the Financial Services CGU. The impairment loss has been recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss within operating result.
No impairment losses were recognised for the CGUs Legal Advisory, Engineering & Project Management and Finance Advisory, as the recoverable amounts of these CGUs exceeded their respective carrying amounts as at 31 December 2025. Following recognition of the impairment loss, the recoverable amount of the Financial Services CGU equals its carrying amount.
The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the various labels is as follows:
Cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Legal advisory | 97,763 | 97,763 |
Engineering & Project Management | 90,210 | 74,601 |
Finance advisory | 68,027 | 68,027 |
Financial services | 15,523 | 20,583 |
Total per 31 december | 271,523 | 260,974 |
The impairment of goodwill recognised for the Financial Services CGU was primarily the result of a downward revision of expected future cash flows compared to prior assumptions. This revision reflects continued challenging market conditions during 2025 and their impact on operating performance.
During the year, utilisation levels developed below prior expectations, reflecting increased client caution and pressure on billable volumes. In addition, competitive intensity and pricing pressure continued to affect margins, limiting the ability to fully offset cost increases through tariff adjustments. These developments resulted in downward revisions to assumptions regarding billability levels, FTE growth and expected profitability.
Management observes a more moderate market environment for Financial Services, which is reflected in the updated budget assumptions. As a result, the outlook for Financial Services is focused more on stability, with expected improvements primarily driven by internal performance improvements rather than underlying market growth.
As a consequence of these revised assumptions, the value‑in‑use of the Financial Services CGU declined below its carrying amount as at 31 December 2025, resulting in the recognition of an impairment loss of 5.1 million euros.
Given the level of judgement involved, management has performed sensitivity analyses on the key assumptions used in the impairment test. The key assumptions applied in the impairment test represent management’s best estimate of the future cash flows at the reporting date.
While revenue growth and EBITDA margins are disclosed as key assumptions in the impairment model, management notes that billability represents the primary operational driver underlying these assumptions. Accordingly, billability is included in the sensitivity analysis, as changes in utilisation directly translate into changes in revenue and profitability.
Management considers the Finance Advisory CGU to be the most sensitive to changes in the post‑tax discount rate, the terminal growth rate and the percentage of billable hours. As at 31 December 2025, the recoverable amount of this CGU using the discount rate presented above, exceeds the carrying amount by only 3%. Management has assessed several scenarios reflecting reasonably possible adverse changes in key assumptions. These scenarios indicate that a decrease of 0.25% in the post‑tax discount rate or the percentage of billable hours would result in the aggregate carrying amount of the Finance Advisory CGU exceeding its aggregate recoverable amount by approximately 0.2 million to 0.3 euros, whereas a similar change in the terminal growth rate would not result in an impairment.
For the Financial Services CGU, an impairment loss has already been recognised as at 31 December 2025. Consequently, the recoverable amount of this CGU equals its carrying amount at year‑end. The value‑in‑use of the Financial Services CGU therefore remains highly sensitive to changes in the post‑tax discount rate, terminal growth rate and the percentage of billable hours. A decrease of 0.25 percentage points in any one of these assumptions would result in additional impairment losses of approximately 0.6 million to 1.1 million euros. For the Legal Advisory and Engineering & Project Management CGUs, management considers that sufficient headroom exists to absorb reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions applied.
The movements in 2025 of tangible fixed assets can be specified as follows:
in € thousands | Office | Cars | Renovations, furnishings and inventory | Computer | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost | 15,149 | 44,354 | 2,329 | 1,781 | 63,613 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairments | (2,149) | (11,904) | (390) | (607) | (15,050) |
Book value at 31 December 2024 | 13,000 | 32,450 | 1,939 | 1,174 | 48,563 |
Additions | 63 | 12,565 | 469 | 499 | 13,596 |
Disposals | - | - | (54) | (155) | (209) |
Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | 387 | 381 | 35 | 1 | 804 |
Remeasurements | 532 | (232) | - | - | 300 |
Depreciation | (2,464) | (13,169) | (573) | (632) | (16,838) |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 11,518 | 31,995 | 1,816 | 887 | 46,216 |
Cost | 16,131 | 57,068 | 2,779 | 2,126 | 78,104 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairments | (4,613) | (25,073) | (963) | (1,239) | (31,888) |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 11,518 | 31,995 | 1,816 | 887 | 46,216 |
In 2025, the Group did not recognise any impairments on tangible fixed assets. No impairment losses on tangible fixed assets recognised in previous years were reversed in 2025.
Buildings and cars concern right-of-use assets. The Group has several lease contracts relating to the lease of office buildings and cars. The lease term of the contracts varies between 2 and 10 years. Lease contracts for cars provided to employees generally have lease terms of 48 to 60 months. The Group also has lease contracts with a term less than 12 months and lease contracts where the underlying asset is low in value. For these, the Group uses the practical exception under IFRS 16. For the lease liabilities, please refer to section 24 Lease liabilities.
The movements in 2025 of financial fixed assets can be specified as follows:
in € thousands | Associated companies | Other non-current loans | Contract costs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Book value at 31 December 2024 | 5 | 2,087 | 1,125 | 3,217 |
Additions | - | 120 | - | 120 |
Interest | - | (53) | (219) | (272) |
Reclassification to other current assets | - | (1,950) | - | (1,950) |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 5 | 204 | 906 | 1,115 |
The other non‑current loans comprise a subordinated loan of 1.5 million euros provided to the buyer of a former subsidiary of the Group on 1 November 2022 in connection with the acquisition. This subordinated loan has a four‑year maturity and carries an interest rate of 2% during the first three years, increasing to 4% thereafter. As at 31 December 2025, the remaining maturity of this subordinated loan is less than twelve months and, accordingly, this loan has been reclassified to other current assets and is presented in note 19 Trade receivables and other current assets.
Contracts costs relate to transaction costs associated with the revolving facility for additional working capital purposes (also refer to note 23 Borrowings). These costs are not directly tied to the amount borrowed and such these costs are not part of the borrowings. Instead, these costs are capitalized and amortised on a straight–line basis over the period of the facility. The termination date of the facility is 4.5 years after the first issue date (being 19 December 2024).
Trade receivables and other current assets can be specified as follows:
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Trade receivables | 28,617 | 31,298 |
Unbilled revenues | 22,230 | 28,568 |
Contract assets | 2,372 | - |
53,219 | 59,866 | |
Provision for expected credit losses | (979) | (974) |
52,240 | 58,892 | |
Receivables from former shareholder | - | 444 |
Receivables from parent company | 10,466 | 8,200 |
Current loans | 1,950 | - |
Other receivables | 4,289 | 5,276 |
Total | 68,945 | 72,812 |
All trade receivables and other current assets have an expected maturity of less than one year. The fair value of trade receivables, unbilled revenues and other receivables approximates the carrying amount. The trade receivables and other receivables are hold-to-collect contractual cash flows. Unbilled revenues relate to amounts for services already performed for which the Group has obtained an unconditional right to consideration, but which had not yet been invoiced as at the reporting date.
A contract asset represents the Group’s right to consideration in exchange for services that have been transferred to a customer, where this right is conditional upon the satisfaction of contractual criteria other than the passage of time. Contract assets arise primarily from fixed fee contracts for consultancy and professional services. For these contracts, revenue is recognised over time based on progress towards completion of the relevant performance obligations. A contract asset is recognised when revenue is recognised prior to invoicing and before the Group has an unconditional right to payment. Once the contractual conditions for invoicing are met, generally upon customer acceptance or the completion of agreed milestones, contract assets are reclassified to trade receivables. The majority of contract assets are expected to be billed and reclassified to trade receivables within twelve months. The change in contract assets during the year reflects a refinement in the application of IFRS 15, resulting in a more precise distinction within contract-related balances as at 31 December 2025. The change does not relate to new contracts, changes in performance obligations or the timing of revenue recognition.
The current loans comprise a subordinated loan of 1.5 million euros provided to the buyer of a former subsidiary of the Group on 1 November 2022 in connection with the acquisition. This subordinated loan has a four‑year maturity and carries an interest rate of 2% during the first three years, increasing to 4% thereafter. As at 31 December 2025, the remaining maturity of this subordinated loan is less than twelve months and, accordingly, the loan has been reclassified to other current assets
The Group measures the loss allowance for trade receivables at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses, applying the simplified approach in accordance with IFRS 9. Expected credit losses are estimated using a provision matrix, based on historical credit loss experience for trade receivables, adjusted where appropriate for current and forward looking information. Trade receivables relating to debtors that are subject to liquidation or bankruptcy proceedings are assessed individually. Based on historical experience, such receivables are generally not recoverable and, accordingly, a loss allowance of up to 100% is recognised.
The movement in the provision for expected credit losses on trade receivables (including unbilled revenues and contract assets) is as follows:
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
At 1 January | 974 | 771 |
Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | - | 3 |
Additions during the year | 134 | 203 |
Unused amounts reversed | (129) | (3) |
At 31 December | 979 | 974 |
The following table details the risk profile of trade receivables (including unbilled revenues and contract assets) based on the Group's provision matrix as per 31 December 2025:
31 December 2025 | Expected credit loss rate | Gross carrying amount | Expected credit loss | Lifetime ECL | Net carrying amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not past due | 0.25% | 47,614 | 119 | - | 47,495 |
<30 days past due | 1.00% | 2,638 | 26 | - | 2,612 |
31-60 days past due | 2.75% | 954 | 26 | - | 928 |
61-90 days past due | 5.00% | 466 | 23 | - | 443 |
>90 days past due | 10.00% | 847 | 85 | - | 762 |
Bankruptcies | 100% | 700 | 700 | - | - |
Total | 53,219 | 979 | - | 52,240 |
The following table details the risk profile of trade receivables (including unbilled revenues and contract assets) based on the Group's provision matrix as per 31 December 2024:
31 December 2024 | Expected credit loss rate | Gross carrying amount | Expected credit loss | Lifetime ECL | Net carrying amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not past due | 0.25% | 54,010 | 135 | - | 53,875 |
<30 days past due | 1.00% | 2,495 | 25 | - | 2,470 |
31-60 days past due | 2.75% | 1,002 | 28 | - | 974 |
61-90 days past due | 5.00% | 431 | 22 | - | 409 |
>90 days past due | 10.00% | 1,293 | 129 | - | 1,164 |
Bankruptcies | 100% | 635 | 635 | - | - |
Total | 59,866 | 974 | - | 58,892 |
At the end of 2025, an amount of 0.4 million euros (2024: 0.6 million) is held in a blocked account and the use of these funds is limited to tax obligations. An amount of 0.5 million euros (2024: 0.4 million) is not at free disposal and is held for bank guarantees. The remaining cash is at free disposal.
The issued capital of the company is 0.04 euro and is divided into 4 ordinary shares of 0.01 euro. Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. has no cumulative preference shares or priority shares. The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to dividend if applicable and are entitled to cast one vote per share at the general meeting of the company.
For the movements in equity attributable to the shareholders of the company, see note 36 Equity.
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Profit attributable to the legal entity | (38,438) | (41,574) |
Profit appropriation | (38,438) | (41,574) |
Deemed dividend distribution on ordinary shares | - | - |
The board proposes to the General Meeting to not pay out any dividends for 2025 and to deduct the net loss for the year of 38.4 million euros from the retained earnings.
In 2023, the Group entered into a Management Equity Plan (“MEP”), granting selected managers the opportunity to participate in the Company’s growth by subscribing to depositary receipts linked to the issuance of different classes of shares, against a subscription price. The MEP falls withing the scope of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment and is classified as an equity-settled plan. The underlying shares are held by an administration foundation, Stichting Administrative Kantoor ("STAK") that in turn issues the depositary receipts to the employees.
The depositary receipts were granted in December 2023 and September 2024. The fair value of the depositary receipts at both grant dates equals the subscription price paid by the participants of the plan being 21.2 million euros. Therefore, no expense is recognized by the Company for the awards granted.
The overview of the deferred tax assets and liabilities is as follows:
Assets | Liabilities | Net | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
Intangible fixed assets | - | - | (47,723) | (50,317) | (47,723) | (50,317) |
IFRS 16 | 460 | 263 | - | - | 460 | 263 |
Book value | 460 | 263 | (47,723) | (50,317) | (47,263) | (50,054) |
The deferred tax liability on intangible assets relates to temporary measurement differences of intangible assets related to the acquisition of subsidiaries.
Right-of-use assets with the corresponding liability are not recognised for tax purposes. For both the asset and the liability a deferred tax position is recognised and netted for reporting purposes.
The deferred taxes are determined using tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted at the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax liability is settled or the deferred tax asset is realised.
The statement of changes in deferred taxes in 2025 is as follows and is predominantly non-current in nature:
in € thousands | 1 January 2025 | Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | Recognised in Consolidated statement of | 31 December 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intangible fixed assets | (50,317) | (2,273) | 4,867 | (47,723) |
IFRS 16 | 263 | - | 197 | 460 |
Book value | (50,054) | (2,273) | 5,064 | (47,263) |
The statements of changes in deferred taxes in 2024 is as follows and is predominantly non-current in nature:
in € thousands | 1 January 2024 | Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | Recognised in Consolidated statement of | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intangible fixed assets | (54,599) | (4,725) | 9,007 | (50,317) |
Recognised tax losses | 533 | - | (533) | - |
Capitalized bank fees | (2,155) | - | 2,155 | - |
IFRS 16 | 142 | - | 121 | 263 |
Book value | (56,079) | (4,725) | 10,750 | (50,054) |
The Group’s interest‑bearing loans and borrowings comprise secured and unsecured loans and borrowings and consist primarily of bonds and bank facilities. Lease liabilities are excluded from this note and are disclosed separately in note 24 Lease liabilities.
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of directly attributable transaction costs, and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
The Group has the following interest‑bearing loans and borrowings, classified by security profile:
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Other loans | 367 | 346 |
Unsecured borrowings at amortised cost | 367 | 346 |
Bank loans | 15,000 | - |
Bonds | 243,651 | 242,064 |
Secured borrowings at amortised cost | 258,651 | 242,064 |
Total borrowings | 259,018 | 242,410 |
The above table provides an overview of the Group’s interest‑bearing loans and borrowings based on their security profile, distinguishing between secured and unsecured financing arrangements.
The following table provides a further analysis of these borrowings by contractual interest rate and maturity and distinguishes between current and non‑current borrowings in accordance with their contractual repayment profile.
In % or in € thousands | Interest rate | Maturity | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Acquisition and capex facility | EURIBOR +4.25 | 2-4-2026 | 15,000 | - |
Bank overdraft facility | EURIBOR +4.25 | On demand | - | - |
Other loans | 7.00 | 30-4-2026 | 325 | 320 |
Current interest-bearing loans and borrowings | 15,325 | 320 | ||
Bonds | EURIBOR +5.75 | 19-12-2029 | 243,651 | 242,064 |
Other loans | 5.00 | 30-4-2026 | 40 | 26 |
Non-current interest-bearing loans and borrowings | 243,691 | 242,090 |
The Group’s financing structure is designed to support its long‑term strategy and working capital requirements. Financing has been obtained through the issuance of bonds and the availability of bank facilities.
The Group has issued bonds which have been listed on the Open Market of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since the issue date and, as from 15 December 2025, have also been admitted to trading on Nasdaq STO Corporate Bonds of Nasdaq Stockholm AB.
The bonds mature on 16 December 2029 and bear interest at EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus a margin of 5.75%. Interest is payable periodically in accordance with the bond terms.
The bonds are secured by share pledges over the Issuer and each Guarantor, pledges over subordinated loans provided to the Issuer by its direct or indirect parent company, and pledges over intragroup loans. No financial covenants apply to the bonds, other than certain restrictions related to the incurrence of additional financial indebtedness and the making of restricted payments.
The Group has agreed a revolving credit facility with Rabobank for general working capital purposes. The facility consists of:
a bank overdraft facility of up to 20 million euros; and
an Acquisition and capex facility of up to 20 million euros.
Interest on the bank facilities is charged at EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus a margin of 4.25%. The utilisation of the facilities depends on the Group’s liquidity requirements. The termination date of the facility is 4.5 years after the first issue date, being 19 December 2024.
As at 31 December 2025, the Acquisition and capex facility was drawn for 15.0 million euros in connection with the acquisition of Wepro, while the bank overdraft facility remained undrawn.
The revolving credit facility with Rabobank is subject to financial conditions and compliance requirements that are customary for financing agreements of this nature. Following the reporting date, the terms and conditions of the senior bank facilities were renegotiated within the existing contractual framework. Based on the contractual framework and the applicable compliance procedures, the Group was not in breach of these financial conditions.
In 2024, the Group obtained a vendor loan of 0.3 million euros in connection with the acquisition of Careffect B.V. The loan carried a fixed interest rate of 7% per annum and was fully repaid in January 2025.
The movements in interest‑bearing loans and borrowings during the year are as follows:
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
At 1 January | 242,410 | 189,327 |
Additions | 15,000 | 257,064 |
Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | 543 | 19,800 |
Amortization capitalized financing expenses loan | - | 8,851 |
Capitalized interest | 1,587 | 38 |
Repayment of loans | (524) | (232,670) |
At 31 December | 259,016 | 242,410 |
Less: non-current loans | 243,691 | 242,090 |
Current part loans | 15,325 | 320 |
Borrowings are classified as current or non‑current based on their contractual maturity at the reporting date. Amounts repayable within twelve months after the reporting date are presented as current interest‑bearing loans and borrowings; all other borrowings are presented as non‑current.
Further information on the Group’s exposure to interest rate risk arising from its variable‑rate interest‑bearing loans and borrowings is disclosed in note Interest rate risk.
The movements in lease liabilities can be specified as follows:
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
At 1 January | 46,463 | 37,850 |
Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | 768 | 4,481 |
Additions | 12,629 | 15,320 |
Remeasurements | 506 | 2,499 |
Lease payments | (18,474) | (16,604) |
Interest costs | 3,408 | 2,917 |
At 31 December | 45,300 | 46,463 |
Less: non-current lease liablities | 30,586 | 32,835 |
Current lease liabilities | 14,714 | 13,628 |
The lease liabilities relate to offices and cars.
Lease liabilities are initially measured at the present value of the lease payment to be paid during the lease term, discounted using the incremental borrowing rate. Lease liabilities are subsequently increased by the interest expense on the lease liabilities and decreased by lease payments made during the lease term. The lease payments do not include variable payments.
The total lease liabilities at year-end 2025 amounted to 45.3 million euros (2024: 46.5 million), of which 12.2 million euros relate to office building leases (2024: 13.5 million) and 33.1 million euros to car leases (2024: 33.0 million). The following amounts have been recognised in the profit or loss statement: depreciation on right-of-use assets 15.6 million euros (2024: 14.1 million), finance costs related to lease liabilities 3.4 million euros (2024: 2.9 million), costs of short-term leases 0.2 million euros (2024: 0.8 million) and costs of low value leases 0.0 million euros (2024: 0.0 million).
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Trade payables | 11,802 | 6,483 |
Lease obligations | 14,714 | 13,628 |
Taxes and social security | 21,756 | 23,846 |
Wages, salaries and deferred compensation components | 13,926 | 13,906 |
Payables to group companies | 16,583 | 11,563 |
Other payables | 8,940 | 7,275 |
87,721 | 76,701 | |
Less: non-current Trade payables and other current liabilities | - | - |
Current Trade payables and other current liabilities | 87,721 | 76,701 |
Due to the predominantly short‑term nature of trade and other payables, their carrying amount approximates fair value.
The Group is exposed to the several financial risks, including:
Credit risk;
Liquidity risk;
Interest rate risk.
The Group does not have derivatives and hedging instruments. In addition, the Group is based in the Eurozone and all revenues are realised in this region. The currency risk is therefore minimal.
This section provides information on the Group's exposure to the above mentioned risks, its objectives, policies and procedures for managing and measuring these risks and the Group 's capital structure. In addition, quantitative disclosures are included in the consolidated financial statements.
The Board is responsible for the design, implementation and oversight of the Group’s risk management and internal control framework. Risk management focuses on identifying and managing risks related to the Group’s financial and operational objectives.
The Group’s internal control and risk management system comprises the following main components:
Guidelines and consultation structures;
Reporting and analysis; and
Internal control procedures.
Following the listing of the Group, an Audit Committee has been established at Group level, at the level of Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. The Audit Committee assists the Supervisory Board of Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, in particular with respect to financial reporting, the effectiveness of internal control and risk management systems, and the relationship with the external auditor. The Audit Committee reports its findings and recommendations to the Supervisory Board.
The Group operates in a macro‑economic environment characterised by continued economic and political uncertainty. Factors such as inflationary pressure, changes in interest rates, geopolitical tensions and evolving regulatory requirements may affect client decision‑making, investment priorities and demand for external expertise.
While the professional services and secondment market is inherently sensitive to economic cycles, the Group’s activities are predominantly focused on structural and regulatory‑driven demand, including infrastructure, energy transition, legal, compliance and financial advisory services. As the majority of the Group’s operational activities are conducted in the Netherlands, the Group is primarily exposed to Dutch market conditions. As a result, the direct impact of macro‑economic and geopolitical developments on the Group’s financial position and performance remained limited during 2025.
Macro-economic assumptions, including developments in interest rates, inflation and market demand, have been taken into account where relevant in management’s key estimates and judgments. Specific areas of focus include impairment testing of goodwill and other intangible assets, the recoverability of deferred tax assets, liquidity forecasts and the assessment of interest rate risk. The Group continuously monitors external developments and incorporates updated assumptions in its financial planning and risk management processes to ensure adequate resilience under changing market conditions.
Credit risk is the risk of a financial loss if a customer or counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations. Credit risk arises primarily from trade and other receivables from customers and from cash at banks.
Expected credit losses on trade receivables are recognised in accordance with the simplified approach under IFRS 9, whereby a loss allowance is measured at an amount equal to lifetime expected credit losses using a provision matrix based on historical default experience.
Credit risk relating to cash and cash equivalents is limited as the Group places funds only with reputable financial institutions in the Netherlands.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group is unable to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s objective in managing liquidity risk is to ensure that sufficient liquidity is available at all times to meet current and future financial obligations, both under normal and adversed market conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or damaging the Group’s reputation.
Liquidity risk is managed centrally. The Group prepares detailed short‑ and medium‑term cash flow forecasts, which are updated on a regular basis and take into account expected operating cash flows, scheduled debt service, working capital requirements and other known or reasonably expected cash outflows.
Based on these forecasts, the Group ensures that adequate liquidity is available through operating cash flows and the availability of a bank overdraft facility. The overdraft facility provides short‑term liquidity flexibility and is intended to mitigate the risk of temporary timing differences between cash inflows and outflows. Management monitors the Group’s liquidity position on an ongoing basis and may take mitigating actions, where appropriate.
The Group aims to maintain sufficient liquidity buffers to support its operations on a going concern basis and to withstand periods of adverse market conditions.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the Group’s financial performance and cash flows are affected by changes in market interest rates. The Group is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its interest‑bearing loans and borrowings that carry variable interest rates.
The Group’s interest‑bearing financing consists of bonds and bank facilities. The coupon on the bonds is based on EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus a margin of 5.75%. The interest rate on the bank overdraft facility and the acquisition and capex Facility is based on EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus a margin of 4.25%. The utilisation of the bank overdraft facility and the acquisition and capex Facility depends on the Group’s liquidity requirements.
The Group’s policy with respect to interest rate risk is aimed at managing the exposure arising from its financing structure. Where considered appropriate from a risk management perspective, the Group may consider measures such as fixing interest rates for a longer period or incorporating interest rate caps.
At the reporting date, the Group has not entered into any derivative financial instruments to hedge its interest rate exposure.
If interest rates had been 1 percentage point higher or lower on average during the year, with all other variables held constant, the net interest expense for the year would have been approximately 2.6 million euros higher or lower, respectively.
The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities within the Group will be able to continue as going concerns while maximising the return to shareholders through the optimisation of the balance between debt and equity.
The capital structure of the Group consists of net debt and equity. Debt is defined as long‑ and short‑term borrowings and lease liabilities. Net debt is defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents.
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Net debt1 | 290,869 | 267,484 |
being: | ||
Borrowings | 259,016 | 242,410 |
Lease liabilities | 45,300 | 46,463 |
Cash and cash equivalents | -13,447 | -21,389 |
290,869 | 267,484 | |
Solvency1 | 27.5% | 33.1% |
Liquidity1 | 79.4% | 121.1% |
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Not later than 1 year | 1,091 | 1,340 |
Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years | 1,428 | 1,578 |
Later than 5 years | 475 | 551 |
Total commitments | 2,994 | 3,469 |
Guarantees to third parties | 304 | 679 |
The contractual commitments mainly relate to the service components of office building leases amounting to 2.2 million euros (2024: 2.6 million) and car lease contracts with a term of less than one year amounting to 0.2 million euros (2024: 0.2 million).
No guarantees were issued other than those for rental obligations. The Group issued guarantees totalling 0.3 million euros to a third party (2024: 0.7 million).
An entity of Team EIFFEL is a member of a partnership and is, therefore, jointly and severally liable for the liabilities of that partnership.
Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. and its subsidiaries form a fiscal unity for corporate income tax purposes, with Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. as the head of the fiscal unity. Each company is jointly and severally liable for the corporate income tax liabilities of the fiscal unity. Corporate income tax is allocated to the entities included in the fiscal unity as if they were independently liable for tax. For value‑added tax purposes, a fiscal unity is in place with Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. as the head of the fiscal unity, excluding Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries.
As part of our work, the Group may be involved in claims and disputes. The Group will consult legal advisors if necessary. When it is probable that a financial claim will result in an outflow of resources and the amount of the liability can be reliably estimated, a provision will be recognised. No provision is recognised in the balance sheet as at the balance sheet date.
There have been no events after the reporting date that require adjustment of, or disclosure in, the consolidated financial statements.
The rights of use assets and the related lease obligations relate exclusively to leases of office buildings and lease contracts of cars. The redemption part of the lease liability is presented as part of the financing cash flow. The interest expense related to the lease liability and the adjustment for depreciation expense on the right of use assets are included in the operating cash flow.
Financing activities further comprise bonds, the acquisition and capex facility, the bank overdraft facility and other loans. Cash flows relating to these items are presented within the financing cash flow.
Investments, new commitments and contract adjustments do not result in cash flows and are not reflected as such in the consolidated cash flow statement.
For completeness, the table below presents a reconciliation of the total liabilities from financing activities, showing the movements during the year, including both cash and non‑cash movements.
in € thousands | 1 January 2025 | Financing cash flows1 | Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | New leases | Other changes2 | 31 December 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bonds | 242,064 | - | - | - | 1,587 | 243,651 |
Acquisition and capex facility | - | 15,000 | - | - | - | 15,000 |
Bank overdraft facility | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Lease liabilities | 46,463 | (18,269) | 768 | 13,135 | 3,203 | 45,300 |
Other loans | 346 | (524) | 543 | - | - | 365 |
Total liabilities from financing activities | 288,873 | (3,793) | 1,311 | 13,135 | 4,790 | 304,316 |
Related parties of the Group include:
Key management personnel, comprising the members of the Management Board;
Shareholders of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V.;
Group companies, being subsidiaries within the scope of consolidation as well as group entities with which transactions occur at company‑only level.
All related party transactions in 2025 and 2024 were conducted on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions. Other than the transactions and balances disclosed in this section, no other material related party transactions occurred during the year.
Key management personnel comprise the members of the Management Board. At the end of 2025 and 2024, the Management Board consisted of five members. Key management personnel compensation is disclosed in aggregate and is analysed by category as follows:
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Short-term employee benefits | 987 | 1,026 |
Post-employment benefits | 4 | - |
Other long-term benefits | 91 | 92 |
Termination benefits | - | - |
Share-based payments | - | - |
Total | 1,082 | 1,118 |
A recharge from the parent company of 0.3 million euros (2024: 0.7 million) has been recognised for (former) Management Board members.
A related party charges a management services fee to the Group, which includes, among other components, the remuneration of two Management Board members. The total fee amounted to 0.02 million euros (2024: 0.02 million).
After six years of leadership, G.J. Meppelink stepped down as Chief Executive Officer of the Group as of 9 February 2026. On the same date, he was appointed as a member of the Supervisory Board of Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. J. Maes was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and became a member of the Management Board as of that date.
At company‑only level, the Company has material balances with group companies, which mainly arise from financing arrangements and intercompany settlements.
Transactions with group companies during the year primarily relate to:
intercompany financing;
settlement of costs incurred on behalf of group entities; and
shared services and other operational support.
The total volume of these transactions is considered to be in line with normal business practice within the Group.
The balances with group companies are disclosed in note Other Receivables.
The Group operates a Management Equity Plan (MEP) under which selected members of management participate in the equity of the Company via depositary receipts issued by a foundation (STAK). The plan is classified as an equity‑settled share‑based payment arrangement under IFRS 2.
Further details on the Management Equity Plan are disclosed in note Total Equity and note Equity.
in € thousands | Notes | 2025 | 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | - | - | |||
Cost of sales | - | - | |||
Gross profit | - | - | |||
Other revenues | 3,327 | 1,294 | |||
Selling expenses | - | - | |||
General expenses | 8,228 | 1,233 | |||
8,228 | 1,233 | ||||
Operating profit | (4,901) | 61 | |||
Finance income | 2,325 | 671 | |||
Finance costs | (23,539) | (34,094) | |||
Share of profit of group companies | (12,204) | (11,516) | |||
Result before taxes | (38,319) | (44,878) | |||
Income tax expense | (119) | 3,304 | |||
Net result for the year | (38,438) | (41,574) | |||
in € thousands | Notes | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
Non-current assets | |||
Intangible fixed assets | 241,499 | 246,559 | |
Financial fixed assets | 197,590 | 207,719 | |
Total non-current assets | 439,089 | 454,278 | |
Current assets | |||
Other receivables | 4,787 | 5,649 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 15 | 8 | |
Total current assets | 4,802 | 5,657 | |
Total assets | 443,891 | 459,935 | |
Equity | |||
Issued capital | - | - | |
Share premium reserve | 254,469 | 254,469 | |
Retained earnings | (55,077) | (13,503) | |
Net result for the year | (38,438) | (41,574) | |
Total equity | 160,954 | 199,392 | |
Non-current liabilities | |||
Borrowings | 243,650 | 242,064 | |
Loans from group companies | 1,345 | 1,210 | |
Total non-current liabilities | 244,995 | 243,274 | |
Current liablities | |||
Borrowings | 15,000 | - | |
Trade payables and other current liabilities | 22,942 | 17,269 | |
Total current liablities | 37,942 | 17,269 | |
Total equity and liabilities | 443,891 | 459,935 |
The company-only annual report of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. is prepared in accordance with Title 9, Book 2 of the Netherlands Civil Code. In accordance with subsection 8 of section 362, Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, the recognition and measurement principles applied in this company-only annual report are the same as those applied in the consolidated annual report.
The company-only annual report of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. is presented in euros. Amounts are in thousands of euros, unless otherwise stated.
The accounting policies for the company-only annual report are the same as those for the consolidated annual report, unless further policies are mentioned below. An overview of the accounting policies is included in notes 2 and 3 of the consolidated annual report.
Investments in group companies in which Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. exercises control or where Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. is responsible for central management are measured at net asset value. The net asset value is measured whereby the net assets, liabilities and provisions of the group company are measured and profit is calculated on the basis of the accounting policies used in the consolidated annual report.
The valuation of investments includes intangible assets (such as customer relationships, brand and trade names) acquired in a business combination, less accumulated impairment losses. If the net asset value is negative, the investment is valued at nil. For this purpose, other long-term interests are taken into account that should actually be considered as part of the net investment in the subsidiary. A provision is formed if Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. is wholly or partly liable for debts of the subsidiary or is obliged to enable the subsidiary (for its share) to pay its debts. In determining the size of this provision, allowances for bad debts deducted from receivables from the subsidiary are taken into account. Any write-downs on receivables from group companies due to expected credit losses are eliminated on the item itself. As a result, these write-downs have no net impact on the statement of profit or loss and statement of financial position.
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Interest on bank overdrafts and loans | 21,700 | 22,566 |
Capitalised financing expenses | 1,837 | 8,851 |
Other finance costs | 2 | 2,677 |
Total | 23,539 | 34,094 |
The movement of the intangible fixed assets is as follows:
in € thousands | Goodwill | Total |
|---|---|---|
Cost | 246,559 | 246,559 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairments | - | - |
Book value at 31 December 2024 | 246,559 | 246,559 |
Impairment | (5,060) | (5,060) |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 241,499 | 241,499 |
Cost | 246,559 | 246,559 |
Accumulated amortisation and impairments | (5,060) | (5,060) |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 241,499 | 241,499 |
In 2025, the Group recognised an impairment loss on goodwill of 5.1 million euros (2024: 0.0 million) related to the Financial Services cash‑generating unit. The impairment loss has been recognised in the statement of profit or loss within operating result.
No impairment losses were recognised for the CGUs Legal Advisory, Engineering & Project Management and Finance Advisory, as the recoverable amounts of these CGUs exceeded their respective carrying amounts as at 31 December 2025.
For further information on the impairment testing performed, reference is made to section Impairment testing for goodwill in the consolidated financial statements.
The movement of the financial fixed assets is as follows:
in € thousands | Investments in group companies | Other non-current loans | Contract costs | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Book value at 31 December 2024 | 179,003 | 27,591 | 1,125 | 207,719 |
Share of profit of group companies | (12,204) | - | - | (12,204) |
Amortisation | - | - | (250) | (250) |
Capitalized interest | - | 2,325 | - | 2,325 |
Book value at 31 December 2025 | 166,799 | 29,916 | 875 | 197,590 |
In connection with the acquisition of Clafis Houdster B.V. in 2024, two loans were provided to Eiffel Beheer B.V. with an aggregate principal amount of 26.9 million euros. The loans were granted at arm’s length and bear interest at rates ranging between 7.7% and 10.4% per annum. Both loans have a contractual maturity date of 19 December 2029 and are repayable in full at maturity.
The Group has agreed a revolving credit facility with Rabobank for general working capital purposes. The facility consists of:
a bank overdraft facility of up to 20 million euros; and
an Acquisition and capex facility of up to 20 million euros.
The termination date of the facility is 4.5 years after the first issue date (being 19 December 2024). In order to facilitate this agreement, contract costs have been incurred. These will be amortised over the period that the revolving credit facility is available, 4.5 years.
A summary of the other receivables is as follows:
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Receivables from parent company | 4,772 | 5,619 |
Other receivables | 15 | 30 |
Total | 4,787 | 5,649 |
in € thousands | Issued capital | Share premium reserve | Retained earnings | Result for the year | Total equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at 1 January 2024 | - | 254,469 | - | (13,586) | 240,883 |
Appropriation of the result 2023 | - | - | (13,586) | 13,586 | - |
Other | - | - | 83 | - | 83 |
Result for the year 2024 | - | - | - | (41,574) | (41,574) |
Balance at 31 December 2024 | - | 254,469 | (13,503) | (41,574) | 199,392 |
Appropriation of the result 2024 | - | (41,574) | 41,574 | - | |
Result for the year 2025 | - | - | - | (38,438) | (38,438) |
Balance at 31 December 2025 | - | 254,469 | (55,077) | (38,438) | 160,954 |
The issued capital of the company is 0.04 euro and is divided into 4 ordinary shares of 0.01 euro. All issued shares are fully paid. Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. has no cumulative preference shares or priority shares. The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to dividends and one vote per share at meetings of the company.
The share premium reserve comprises amounts paid up on issued shares to the extent that such payments exceed the nominal value of the relevant shares.
At the General Meeting of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. held on 27 May 2025, the profit appropriation for 2024 was determined as follows:
in € thousands | 2024 |
|---|---|
Profit attributable to the legal entity | (41,574) |
Profit appropriation | (41,574) |
Deemed dividend distribution on ordinary shares | - |
in € thousands | 2025 |
|---|---|
Profit attributable to the legal entity | (38,438) |
Profit appropriation | (38,438) |
Deemed dividend distribution on ordinary shares | - |
The board proposes to the General Meeting to not pay out any dividends for 2025 and to deduct the net loss for the year of 38.4 million euros from the retained earnings.
In 2023, the Group entered into a Management Equity Plan (“MEP”), granting selected managers the opportunity to participate in the Company’s growth by subscribing to depositary receipts linked to the issuance of different classes of shares, against a subscription price. The MEP falls withing the scope of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment and is classified as an equity-settled plan. The underlying shares are held by an administration foundation, Stichting Administrative Kantoor ("STAK") that in turn issues the depositary receipts to the employees.
The depositary receipts were granted in December 2023 and September 2024. The fair value of the depositary receipts at both grant dates equals the subscription price paid by the participants of the plan being 21.2 million euros. Therefore, no expense is recognized by the Company for the awards granted.
The movement of the borrowings is as follows:
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
At 1 January | 242,064 | 186,649 |
Additions | 15,000 | 257,064 |
Acquired on acquisition of a subsidiary | - | 19,500 |
Amortization capitalized financing expenses loan | 1,586 | 8,851 |
Repayment of loans | - | (230,000) |
At 31 December | 258,650 | 242,064 |
Less: non-current loans | 243,650 | 242,064 |
Current part loans | 15,000 | - |
Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. has issued bonds which have been listed on the Open Market of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange since the issue date and, as from 15 December 2025, have also been admitted to trading on Nasdaq STO Corporate Bonds of Nasdaq Stockholm AB.
The bonds mature on 16 December 2029 and bear interest at EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus a margin of 5.75%. Interest is payable periodically in accordance with the bond terms.
The bonds are secured by share pledges over the Issuer and each Guarantor, pledges over subordinated loans provided to the Issuer by its direct or indirect parent company, and pledges over intragroup loans. No financial covenants apply to the bonds, other than certain restrictions related to the incurrence of additional financial indebtedness and the making of restricted payments.
The Group has agreed a revolving credit facility with Rabobank for general working capital purposes. The facility consists of:
a bank overdraft facility of up to 20 million euros; and
an Acquisition and capex facility of up to 20 million euros.
Interest on the bank facilities is charged at EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus a margin of 4.25%. The utilisation of the facilities depends on the Group’s liquidity requirements. The termination date of the facility is 4.5 years after the first issue date, being 19 December 2024.
As at 31 December 2025, the Acquisition and capex facility was drawn for 15.0 million euros in connection with the acquisition of Wepro, while the bank overdraft facility remained undrawn.
The revolving credit facility with Rabobank is subject to financial conditions and compliance requirements that are customary for financing agreements of this nature. Following the reporting date, the terms and conditions of the senior bank facilities were renegotiated within the existing contractual framework. Based on the contractual framework and the applicable compliance procedures, the Group was not in breach of these financial conditions.
Borrowings are classified as current or non‑current based on their contractual maturity at the reporting date. Amounts repayable within twelve months after the reporting date are presented as current interest‑bearing loans and borrowings; all other borrowings are presented as non‑current.
The movement of the loans from group companies is as follows:
in € thousands | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
At 1 January | 1,210 | 12,746 |
Additions | - | - |
Capitalized interest | 135 | 1,428 |
Repayment of loans | - | (12,964) |
At 31 December | 1,345 | 1,210 |
Less: non-current loans | 1,345 | 1,210 |
Current part loans | - | - |
On 19 December 2023, Team EIFFEL granted a loan with an initial principal amount of 12.7 million euros to Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. The loan bears interest at a rate of 10.98% per annum on arm’s length terms, with interest capitalised. During 2024, an amount of 13.0 million euros was repaid. Following this repayment, an outstanding balance of 1.2 million euros remained. The loan has a contractual maturity date of 19 December 2033 and is repayable in full at maturity.
A summary of the trade payables and other current liabilities is as follows:
in € thousands | 31 December 2025 | 31 December 2024 |
|---|---|---|
Trade payables | 370 | 148 |
Payables to parent company | 5,332 | 3,5071 |
Payables to group companies | 15,690 | 12,1581 |
Other payables | 1,550 | 1,456 |
Total | 22,942 | 17,269 |
Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. and its subsidiaries form a fiscal unity for corporate income tax purposes, with Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. as the head of the fiscal unity. Each company is jointly and severally liable for the corporate income tax liabilities of the fiscal unity. Corporate income tax is allocated to the entities included in the fiscal unity as if they were independently liable for tax. For value‑added tax purposes, a fiscal unity is in place with Equipe Holdings 1 B.V. as the head of the fiscal unity, excluding Wepro Group B.V. and its subsidiaries.
As part of our work, Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. may be involved in claims and disputes. The company will consult legal advisors if necessary. When it is probable that a financial claim will result in an outflow of resources and the amount of the liability can be reliably estimated, a provision will be recognised. No provision is recognised in the balance sheet as at the balance sheet date.
For further information on related party transactions including directors’ remuneration, reference is made to note 30 Related party transactions in the consolidated financial statements.
For the following group companies included in the consolidation, the legal entity has issued liabilities as referred to in Section 2:403 of the Netherlands Civil Code:
Team EIFFEL B.V.
ConQuaestor Interim Professionals B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Banking Professionals B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Beheer B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Engineering B.V. – Bussum
DPA Finance B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA IT B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Legal B.V. – Bussum
DPA Nederland B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Overheid B.V. – Bussum
DPA PeopleGroup B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Privacy B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Supply Chain People B.V. – Amsterdam
DPA Tax B.V. – Amsterdam
Fagro Consultancy B.V. – Beek (LB)
GEOS IT Professionals B.V. – Amsterdam
P.A. Jones B.V. – Amsterdam
SOZA XPERT B.V. – Tilburg
Claimingo B.V. – Utrecht
DPA Digital B.V. – Amsterdam
Yobz B.V. – Amsterdam
Toren Holding B.V. - Arnhem
Eiffel Beheer B.V. - Arnhem
Eiffel B.V. - Arnhem
Legal Center Eiffel B.V. - Arnhem
AnalyseCentrum B.V. - Arnhem
Ruimte in Advies B.V. - Roermond
GemVast B.V. - 's-Gravenhage
Nieuwe Hoogten Holding B.V. - 's-Gravenhage
Palladio Groep B.V. - 's-Gravenhage
InterConsulting Group B.V. - Utrecht
Balance Ervaring op Projectbasis B.V. - Utrecht
Task Integraal Projectmanagement B.V. - Utrecht
Task Product & Contractmanagement B.V. - Utrecht
Primaned Projectadvies B.V. - Capelle aan den IJssel
Thorbecke Holding B.V. - Zwolle
Thorbecke B.V. - Zwolle
Thorbecke Applicaties B.V. - Zwolle
Careffect - Bilthoven
Clafis Houdster B.V. - Heerenveen
Clafis Groep B.V. - Heerenveen
Clafis B.V. - Heerenveen
We refer to 28 Subsequent events in the consolidation financial statements.
Amsterdam, 29 April 2026
Management Board: |
|---|
J. Maes, Director |
Y. Bonenberg, Director |
H. Arts, Director |
M. Janssen-Pezerović, Director |
K. Walker, Director |
In Article 18 of the Company's Articles of Association the following has been presented concerning the appropriation of the result:
18.1 The General Meeting has the authority to allocate the profitsprofits determined by adoption of the annual accounts. If the General Meeting does not adopt a resolution regarding the allocation of the profitsprofits prior to or at the latest immediately after the adoption of the annual accounts, the profitsprofits shall be reserved.
18.2 The General Meeting has the authority to make distributions. If the Company is required by law to maintain reserves, this authority only applies to the extent that the equity exceeds these reserves. No resolution of the General Meeting to distribute shall have effect without the consent of the Management Board. The Management Board may withhold such consent only if it knows or reasonably should expect that after the distribution, the Company will be unable to continue the payment of its due debts.
Team EIFFEL prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS‑EU. In addition to the financial measures defined under IFRS‑EU, the Group presents certain alternative performance measures (APMs). These APMs are used internally by management to monitor performance and are also applied in external reporting to provide additional insight into the underlying development of the Group. The APMs presented are intended to complement, not replace, the financial measures prepared in accordance with IFRS‑EU. They should therefore be considered together with the IFRS‑EU figures to obtain a balanced view of the Group’s financial performance, financial position and cash flows.
The APMs described below are not defined under IFRS‑EU and may therefore not be directly comparable to similar measures used by other companies. Team EIFFEL applies these measures consistently over time and uses them in line with internal management reporting. Where relevant, the APMs are directly derived from figures presented in the consolidated financial statements or explained in the related notes.
EBITDA represents earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Management uses EBITDA as a key indicator of the Group’s operational performance, as it reflects the profitability of the core activities before the impact of capital structure, taxation and investment decisions.
EBITDA margin is calculated as EBITDA as a percentage of revenue. This ratio provides insight into operational efficiency and margin development over time.
EBIT represents operating profit after depreciation and amortisation. EBIT is used to assess operating performance after taking into account investments in tangible and intangible assets.
EBIT margin is calculated as EBIT as a percentage of revenue.
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit as a percentage of revenue and reflects the relationship between revenue and direct costs related to the deployment of professionals.
Proforma Results present the financial results of acquired companies as if they had been consolidated from 1 January of the year of acquisition in Team EIFFEL's results.
Proforma EBITDA reflects EBITDA adjusted for one‑off, non‑recurring and/or extraordinary items and is presented to enhance comparability between reporting periods, in particular in relation to acquisitions.
Net debt represents interest‑bearing borrowings and lease liabilities less cash and cash equivalents. This measure is used by management to assess the Group’s leverage and financing position.
Solvability is calculated as equity as a percentage of total assets and provides insight into the capital structure and financial resilience of the Group.
Liquidity represents current assets as a percentage of current liabilities and is used to assess the Group’s short‑term liquidity position.
We have audited the financial statements 2025 of Equipe Holdings 3, based in Schiphol. The financial statements comprise the consolidated and company financial statements.
In our opinion:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. as at 31 December 2025, and of its result and its cash flows for 2025 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (EU-IFRS) and with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
The accompanying company financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. as at 31 December 2025, and of its result for 2025 in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
The consolidated financial statements comprise:
The consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2025.
The following statements for 2025: the consolidated statement of profit or loss, the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows.
The notes comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory information.
The company financial statements comprise:
The company only statement of financial position 31 December 2025.
The company only statement of profit or loss 2025.
The notes comprising a summary of the accounting policies and other explanatory information.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Dutch law, including the Dutch Standards on Auditing. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the ‘Our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements’ section of our report.
We are independent of Equipe Holdings 3 in accordance with the EU Regulation on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities, the ‘Wet toezicht accountantsorganisaties’ (Wta, Audit firms supervision act), the ‘Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van accountants bij assurance-opdrachten’ (ViO, Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, a regulation with respect to independence) and other relevant independence regulations in the Netherlands. Furthermore, we have complied with the Verordening gedrags- en beroepsregels accountants (VGBA, Dutch Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants).
We believe the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
We designed our audit procedures in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole and in forming our opinion thereon. The following information in support of our opinion was addressed in this context, and we do not provide a separate opinion or conclusion on these matters.
Based on our professional judgment we determined the materiality for the financial statements as a whole at EUR 4.1 million. The materiality is based on 1.3% of Revenue. We have also taken into account misstatements and/or possible misstatements that in our opinion are material for the users of the financial statements for qualitative reasons.
We agreed with the Supervisory Board that misstatements in excess of EUR 205,000, which are identified during the audit, would be reported to them, as well as smaller misstatements that in our view must be reported on qualitative grounds.
Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. is at the head of a group of entities. The financial information of this group is included in the consolidated financial statements of Equipe Holdings 3. Based on our risk assessment, we determined the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed, including determining the components at which to perform audit procedures.
Our group audit focused on entities or business units that are material by size, contribution to group results or because they present significant or complex risks, resulting in a targeted scope of account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures for group reporting purposes. We have performed both, the procedures performed on group level, and procedures on the individual component level ourselves using a centralized team. By executing the audit using a centralized team we ensured the appropriate direction, supervision and review.
We ensured that our centralized team had the skills and competencies required for a listed client and involved specialists where relevant, including in IT and cybersecurity; valuation; and environmental, social and governance.
The combination of procedures performed provided sufficient coverage of the group’s material balances, classes of transactions and disclosures and resulted in coverage of approximately 90,8% of revenues and 94.1% of total assets. We reported identified misstatements and other matters of qualitative importance to those charged with governance in line with our reporting arrangements.
By performing the procedures mentioned above at components, together with additional procedures at group level, we have been able to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence about the group's financial information to provide an opinion on the financial statements.
We identified and assessed the risks of material misstatements of the financial statements due to fraud. During our audit we obtained an understanding of the company and its environment and the components of the system of internal control, including the risk assessment process and management's process for responding to the risks of fraud and monitoring the system of internal control and how the Supervisory Board exercises oversight, as well as the outcomes.
We evaluated the design and relevant aspects of the system of internal control and in particular the fraud risk assessment, as well as among others the code of conduct (‘Gedragscode’) and the whistle blower policy (‘Klokkenluidersregeling’). We evaluated the design and the implementation of internal controls designed to mitigate fraud risks.
As part of our process of identifying fraud risks, we evaluated fraud risk factors with respect to financial reporting fraud, misappropriation of assets and bribery and corruption. We evaluated whether these factors indicate that a risk of material misstatement due to fraud is present.
Following these procedures, and the presumed risks under the prevailing audit standards, we identified fraud risks related to management override of controls and the occurrence of revenues, specifically, a risk that the unbilled revenue balance may be overstated.
Our audit procedures to respond to fraud risks include, amongst others, an evaluation of relevant internal controls, supplementary substantive audit procedures, detailed testing of journal entries and post-closing adjustments based on supporting documentation. Data analytics, including selection of journal entries based on risk-based characteristics, form part of our audit approach to address the identified fraud risk.
Additionally, we performed further procedures including among others the following:
We incorporated elements of unpredictability in our audit. We also considered the outcome of our other audit procedures and evaluated whether any findings were indicative of fraud or non-compliance.
We considered available information and made inquiries of relevant entity personnel, the management board and the Supervisory Board.
We tested the appropriateness of journal entries recorded in the general ledger and other adjustments made in the preparation of the financial statements. We performed analysis and substantive procedures on manual entries in the financial administration. We selected and tested journal entries based on risk criteria.
In our audit we performed procedures on the access controls and security of the IT systems.
We evaluated whether the selection and application of accounting policies by the group, particularly those related to subjective measurements and complex transactions, may be indicative of fraudulent financial reporting. Amongst others, specific attention is paid to the accounting of the acquisitions of Wepro B.V.
We evaluated whether the judgments and decisions made by management in making the accounting estimates included in the financial statements indicate a possible bias that may represent a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. Management insights, estimates and assumptions that might have a major impact on the financial statements are disclosed in note 6 of the financial statements.
We performed a retrospective review of management judgments and assumptions related to significant accounting estimates reflected in prior year financial statements. Impairment testing of intangible assets is a significant area to our audit as the determination whether these assets are not carried at more than their recoverable amounts is subject to significant management judgment.
As part of our risk assessment and based on a presumption that there are risks of fraud in revenue recognition, we evaluated which types of revenue give rise to risk of material misstatement due to fraud. We have identified a risk of fraud related to the occurrence of revenues, specifically, a risk that the unbilled revenue balance may be overstated.
Our audit procedures to respond to fraud risks include, amongst others, an evaluation of the in the internal control environment related to the business process revenue recognition. We have performed substantive testing procedures on selected revenue transactions. These procedures include, amongst others, inspection of the entries to source documentation. In our testing approach we have incorporated an element of surprise.
Our audit procedures did not lead to specific indications of fraud or suspicions of fraud with respect to the occurrence of the revenue reported.
Certain management estimates and judgements are considered most significant to our audit. Reference is made to the section ‘Our key audit matters’ for further details on those estimates and judgements.
We assessed the laws and regulations relevant to the company through discussion with the Management Board and Supervisory Board, reading relevant minutes.
As a result of our risk assessment procedures, and while realizing that the effects from non-compliance could considerably vary, we considered the following laws and regulations: (corporate) tax law, the requirements under the International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (EU-IFRS) and Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code with a direct effect on the financial statements as an integrated part of our audit procedures, to the extent material for the financial statements.
We obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding provisions of those laws and regulations generally recognized to have a direct effect on the financial statements.
Apart from these, the entity is subject to other laws and regulations where the consequences of non-compliance could have a material effect on amounts and/or disclosures in the financial statements, for instance, through imposing fines or litigation.
Our procedures are more limited with respect to these laws and regulations that do not have a direct effect on the determination of the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Compliance with these laws and regulations may be fundamental to the operating aspects of the business, to the entity's ability to continue its business, or to avoid material penalties (e.g., compliance with the terms of operating licenses and permits or compliance with environmental regulations) and therefore non-compliance with such laws and regulations may have a material effect on the financial statements. Our responsibility is limited to undertaking specified audit procedures to help identify non-compliance with those laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the financial statements. Our procedures are limited to (i) inquiry of management, the Supervisory Board, the Management Board and others within the entity as to whether the entity is in compliance with such laws and regulations and (ii) inspecting correspondence, if any, with the relevant licensing or regulatory authorities to help identify non-compliance with those laws and regulations that may have a material effect on the financial statements.
Naturally, we remained alert to indications of (suspected) non-compliance throughout the audit.
Finally, we obtained written representations that all known instances of (suspected) fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations have been disclosed to us.
Our responsibilities, as well as the responsibilities of the Management Board and the Supervisory Board, related to going concern under the prevailing standards are outlined in the “Description of responsibilities regarding the financial statements” section below.
In fulfilling our responsibilities, we performed procedures including evaluating the Management Board’s assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and considering the impact of the foreseeable financial, operational, and other conditions outlined in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Based on these procedures, we did not identify any reportable findings related to the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future market developments or conditions may cause a company to cease to continue as going concern. The Management Board’s conclusion on the company's ability to continue as a going concern is outlined in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements. We have communicated the key audit matters to the Supervisory Board. The key audit matters are not a comprehensive reflection of all matters discussed.
Impairment testing for goodwill – Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements
Key audit matter
On 19 December 2023 the company ultimately acquired Team EIFFEL and its subsidiaries. Subsequently, the Company has been expanding its business organically and through acquisitions. As a result of these acquisitions, the Company’s assets as at 31 December 2025 include goodwill, brands and trade names and customer relations for an amount of EUR 456,559k.
The company tests the carrying amount of goodwill annually for impairment, and more frequently if there are indicators that goodwill might be impaired. If required, the carrying amount is reduced to its recoverable amount. For purposes of impairment testing, the Company allocates goodwill to cash generating units (CGU), with the recoverable amounts also being determined at a CGU level.
As a result of impairment testing for the current year, the Management Board concluded on impairment losses of EUR 5.1 million related to the Financial services CGU. Further details on the accounting and disclosure of (goodwill) impairment losses are included in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.
We identified the recoverability of goodwill as a key audit matter due to the significant management judgment required, particularly related to projected revenue growth, the percentage of billable hours and the discount rates. Our audit procedures required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort to evaluate the reasonableness of these assumptions, including the use of our valuation specialists.
Our response
Our audit procedures related to the projections of revenue growth, the percentage of billable hours and the discount rates used by management included the following, among others:
We obtained an understanding of management’s process over the impairment trigger tests and the resulting impairment tests;
We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts;
We evaluated sensitivities in management's projections, which could cause a substantial change to the impairments recorded, and or cause headroom to change in an impairment.
We have evaluated key drivers for the projected cash flows by comparing management’s projections to relevant market data, historical forecasts and/or historical rates.
We have evaluated that management’s disclosure is accordance with the applicable financial reporting standards.
With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of discount rates, including testing the source information underlying the determination of the discount rates, testing the mathematical accuracy of the calculation, and developing a range of independent estimates and comparing those to the discount rates selected by management.
Observation
Applying the aforementioned materiality level, we did not identify reportable findings related to the Company’s impairment test for goodwill and the disclosures in Note 16.
The annual report contains other information, in addition to the financial statements and our auditor's report thereon.
The other information consists of:
The management board report.
Other information as required by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
The sustainability statements
Based on the following procedures performed, we conclude that the other information:
Is consistent with the financial statements and does not contain material misstatements.
Contains all the information regarding the management report and the other information as required by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
We have read the other information. Based on our knowledge and understanding obtained through our audit of the financial statements or otherwise, we have considered whether the other information contains material misstatements.
By performing these procedures, we comply with the requirements of Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code and the Dutch Standard 720. The scope of the procedures performed is substantially less than the scope of those performed in our audit of the financial statements.
The board is responsible for the preparation of the other information, including the management report in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, and the other information as required by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
We were engaged as auditor of Equipe Holdings 3 for the year 2025 and have operated as statutory auditor ever since that financial year.
We have not provided prohibited non-audit services as referred to in Article 5(1) of the EU Regulation on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities.
Equipe Holdings 3 has prepared its annual report in ESEF. The requirements for this are set out in the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 with regard to regulatory technical standards on the specification of a single electronic reporting format (hereinafter: the RTS on ESEF).
In our opinion, the annual report, prepared in XHTML format, including the (partly) marked-up consolidated financial statements, as included in the reporting package by Equipe Holdings 3 complies in all material respects with the RTS on ESEF.
Management is responsible for preparing the annual report including the financial statements in accordance with the RTS on ESEF, whereby management combines the various components into one single reporting package.
Our responsibility is to obtain reasonable assurance for our opinion whether the annual report in this reporting package complies with the RTS on ESEF.
We performed our examination in accordance with Dutch law, including Dutch Standard 3950N ‘Assurance-opdrachten inzake het voldoen aan de criteria voor het opstellen van een digitaal verantwoordingsdocument’ (assurance engagements relating to compliance with criteria for digital reporting). Our examination included amongst others:
Obtaining an understanding of the company's financial reporting process, including the preparation of the reporting package.
Identifying and assessing the risks that the annual report does not comply in all material respects with the RTS on ESEF and designing and performing further assurance procedures responsive to those risks to provide a basis for our opinion, including:
obtaining the reporting package and performing validations to determine whether the reporting package containing the Inline XBRL instance and the XBRL extension taxonomy files has been prepared in accordance with the technical specifications as included in the RTS on ESEF;
examining the information related to the consolidated financial statements in the reporting package to determine whether all required mark-ups have been applied and whether these are in accordance with the RTS on ESEF.
The audit includes verifying that the prepared financial statements comply with the statutory provisions of Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code. Our auditor’s report is issued on the financial statements and will be included with the annual report which will be digitally filed. This means that compliance with all requirements of the SBR Regulatory Technical Standard of the SBR Trade Register domain (including the applied eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) mark-ups) was not part of the audit.
The board is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with EU-IFRS and Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code. Furthermore, the board is responsible for such internal control as the board determines is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
As part of the preparation of the financial statements, the board is responsible for assessing the company's ability to continue as a going concern. Based on the financial reporting frameworks mentioned, the board should prepare the financial statements using the going concern basis of accounting unless the board either intends to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so.
The board should disclose events and circumstances that may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern in the financial statements.
The Supervisory Board is responsible for overseeing the company's financial reporting process.
Our responsibility is to plan and perform the audit engagement in a manner that allows us to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence for our opinion.
Our audit has been performed with a high, but not absolute, level of assurance, which means we may not detect all material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error, during our audit.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. The materiality affects the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and the evaluation of the effect of identified misstatements on our opinion.
We have exercised professional judgment and have maintained professional scepticism throughout the audit, in accordance with Dutch Standards on Auditing, ethical requirements and independence requirements. Our audit included among others:
Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, designing and performing audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtaining audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Obtaining an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal control.
Evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the board.
Concluding on the appropriateness of the board's use of the going concern basis of accounting, and based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor's report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor's report. However, future events or conditions may cause the company to cease to continue as a going concern.
Evaluating the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the disclosures.
Evaluating whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We are responsible for planning and performing the group audit to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business units within the group as a basis for forming an opinion on the financial statements. We are also responsible for the direction, supervision and review of the audit work performed for purposes of the group audit. We bear the full responsibility for the auditor’s report.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant findings in internal control that we identified during our audit. In this respect we also submit an additional report to the audit committee in accordance with Article 11 of the EU Regulation on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities. The information included in this additional report is consistent with our audit opinion in this auditor's report.
We provide the Supervisory Board with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.
From the matters communicated with the Supervisory Board, we determine the key audit matters: those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements. We describe these matters in our auditor's report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, not communicating the matter is in the public interest.
Amsterdam, 29 April 2026
Deloitte Accountants B.V.
C. Binkhorst
Lead Audit Partner
We have performed a limited assurance engagement on the (consolidated) sustainability statement for the year ended 31 December 2025 of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. based in Schiphol (hereinafter: the company) in section ‘Sustainability Statement’ of the accompanying annual report including the information incorporated in the sustainability statement by reference (hereinafter: the sustainability statement).
Based on our procedures performed and the assurance evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the sustainability statement is not, in all material respects:
Prepared in accordance with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) as adopted by the European Commission and in accordance with the double materiality assessment process carried out by the company to identify the information reported pursuant to the ESRS.
Compliant with the reporting requirements provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation).
We have performed our limited assurance engagement on the sustainability statement in accordance with Dutch law, including Dutch Standard 3810N, 'Assurance-opdrachten inzake duurzaamheidsverslaggeving' (Assurance engagements relating to sustainability reporting) which is a specified Dutch standard that is based on the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised) ’Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information’.
Our responsibilities in this regard are further described in the section ‘Our responsibilities for the limited assurance engagement on the sustainability statement’ of our report.
We are independent of Equipe Holdings 3 B.V. in accordance with the ‘Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van accountants bij assurance-opdrachten’ (ViO, Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, a regulation with respect to independence) and other relevant independence regulations in the Netherlands. Furthermore, we have complied with the ‘Verordening gedrags- en beroepsregels accountants’ (VGBA, Dutch Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants).
We believe that the assurance evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion.
Emphasis on the most significant uncertainties affecting the quantitative metrics and monetary amounts
We draw attention to section ‘Introduction – Basis for Preparation’ in the sustainability statement that identifies the quantitative metrics and monetary amounts that are subject to a high level of measurement uncertainty and discloses information about the sources of measurement uncertainty and the assumptions, approximations and judgments the company has made in measuring these in compliance with the ESRS.
The comparability of sustainability information between entities and over time may be affected by the lack of historical sustainability information in accordance with the ESRS and by the absence of a uniform practice on which to draw, to evaluate and measure this information. This allows for the application of different, but acceptable, measurement techniques, especially in the initial years.
Emphasis on the double materiality assessment process
We draw attention to section ‘Stakeholder views and interests’ and ‘Double materiality assessment’ in the sustainability statement. This disclosure explains future improvements in the ongoing due diligence and double materiality assessment process, including robust engagement with affected stakeholders. Due diligence is an on-going practice that responds to and may trigger changes in the company’s strategy, business model, activities, business relationships, operating, sourcing and selling contexts. The double materiality assessment process may also be impacted in time by sector-specific standards to be adopted. The sustainability statement may not include every impact, risk and opportunity or additional entity-specific disclosure that each individual stakeholder (group) may consider important in its own particular assessment.
Emphasis on the use of third-party information
We draw attention to section ‘Introduction – Basis for Preparation’ and ‘Emissions baseline’ in the Sustainability Statement that indicates that certain metrics and calculations are (partly) based on assumptions and sources from third parties. The assumptions and sources (“third-party information”) used are disclosed in the basis of preparation of the respective metric. Validation of such third-party information and certifications is not common market practice.
Our conclusion is not modified in respect of these matters.
No reasonable or limited assurance procedures have been performed on the sustainability statement of prior years. Consequently, the comparative information in the sustainability statement and thereto related disclosures for the year ended 2022, 2023 and 2024 have not been subject to reasonable or limited assurance procedures.
Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.
In reporting forward-looking information in accordance with the ESRS, management of the company is required to prepare the forward-looking information on the basis of disclosed assumptions about events that may occur in the future and possible future actions by the company. The actual outcome is likely to be different since anticipated events frequently do not occur as expected.
Forward-looking information relates to events and actions that have not yet occurred and may never occur. We do not provide assurance on the achievability of this forward-looking information.
Our conclusion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Management is responsible for the preparation of the sustainability statement in accordance with the ESRS, including the double materiality assessment process carried out by the company as the basis for the sustainability statement and disclosure of material impacts, risks and opportunities in accordance with the ESRS. As part of the preparation of the sustainability statement, management is responsible for compliance with the reporting requirements provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation).
Management is also responsible for selecting and applying additional entity-specific disclosures to enable users to understand the company’s sustainability-related impacts, risks or opportunities and for determining that these additional entity-specific disclosures are suitable in the circumstances and in accordance with the ESRS.
Furthermore, management is responsible for such internal control as it determines is necessary to enable the preparation of the sustainability statement that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the sustainability reporting process including the double materiality assessment process carried out by the company.
Our responsibility is to plan and perform the limited assurance engagement in a manner that allows us to obtain sufficient appropriate assurance evidence for our conclusion.
Our assurance engagement is aimed to obtain a limited level of assurance that the sustainability statement is free from material misstatements. The procedures vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance engagement is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed.
We apply the applicable quality management requirements pursuant to the ‘Nadere voorschriften kwaliteitsmanagement’ (NV-KM, regulations for quality management), and accordingly maintain a comprehensive system of quality management including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional standards and other relevant legal and regulatory requirements.
Our limited assurance engagement included among others:
Performing inquiries and an analysis of the external environment and obtaining an understanding of relevant sustainability themes and issues, the characteristics of the company, its activities and the value chain and its key intangible resources in order to assess the double materiality assessment process carried out by the company as the basis for the sustainability statement and disclosure of all material sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities in accordance with the ESRS.
Obtaining through inquiries a general understanding of the internal control environment, the company’s processes for gathering and reporting entity-related and value chain information, the information systems and the company’s risk assessment process relevant to the preparation of the sustainability statement and for identifying the company’s activities, determining eligible and aligned economic activities and prepare the disclosures provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation), without obtaining assurance information about the implementation, or testing the operating effectiveness, of controls.
Assessing the double materiality assessment process carried out by the company and identifying and assessing areas of the sustainability statement, including the disclosures provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation) where misleading or unbalanced information or material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error, are likely to arise (‘selected disclosures’). We designed and performed further assurance procedures aimed at assessing that the sustainability statement is free from material misstatements responsive to this risk analysis.
Considering whether the description of the double materiality assessment process in the sustainability statement made by management appears consistent with the process carried out by the company.
Determining the nature and extent of the procedures to be performed for the group components and locations. For this, the nature, extent and/or risk profile of these components are decisive.
Performing analytical review procedures on quantitative information in the sustainability statement, including consideration of data and trends in the information submitted for consolidation at corporate level.
Assessing whether the company’s methods for developing estimates are appropriate and have been consistently applied for selected disclosures. We considered data and trends; however, our procedures did not include testing the data on which the estimates are based or separately developing our own estimates against which to evaluate management’s estimates.
Analysing, on a limited sample basis, relevant internal and external documentation available to the company (including publicly available information or information from actors throughout its value chain) for selected disclosures.
Reading the other information in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies, if any, with the sustainability statement.
Considering whether:
the disclosures provided to address the reporting requirements provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation) for each of the environmental objectives, reconcile with the underlying records of the company, are consistent or coherent with the sustainability statement and appear reasonable, in particular whether the eligible economic activities meet the cumulative conditions to qualify as aligned and whether the technical screening criteria are met and in compliance with the reporting requirements provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation).
Considering the overall presentation, structure and the fundamental qualitative characteristics of information (relevance and faithful representation: complete, neutral and accurate) reported in the sustainability statement, including the reporting requirements provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation).
Considering, based on our limited assurance procedures and evaluation of the assurance evidence obtained, whether the sustainability statement as a whole is free from material misstatements and prepared in accordance with the ESRS.
Amsterdam, 29 April 2026
Deloitte Accountants B.V.
C. Binkhorst
Equipe Holdings 3 B.V.
Marathon 4
1213 PJ Hilversum
The Netherlands
Telephone: | +31 (0)88 045 6789 |
|---|---|
Email: | info@teameiffel.nl |